Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:18:18.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yields and components of yield of dry beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. C. Hardwick ,
J. M. Hardaker  and
N. L. Innes
R. C. Hardwick
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
J. M. Hardaker
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
N. L. Innes
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Exotic accessions of Phaseolus vulgaris selected for seedling cold tolerance by Austin & Maclean (1972) in a test in controlled environments were grown in a field experiment at Wellesbourne in 1974. Yields of up to 4·;7 t/ha at a plant density of 34 plants/m2 were obtained. In 1975, six selected accessions were grown at 21 plants/m2 at six different sites. Mean site yields ranged from 1·0 to 3·1 t/ha. The six accessions all had better emergence and higher yields than two commercial cultivars used as controls. The genotype × site interactions for yield (and for yield components) were small. The variation in yield between accessions (from 2·0 to 2·5 t/ha) was smaller than the variation in yield between sites. Variation in yield components tended to be additive between sites, and compensatory between accessions. There was a negative correlation between crude protein content and yield across accessions; the correlation between protein content and yield across sites was not significant. Accessions differed significantly in the amount of green leaf still attached to plants at harvest. This variation was not related to maturity as judged by moisture content of the seed. There was a negative correlation across accessions between the weight of leaf per plant at harvest and harvest index (the ratio of seed weight to stem weight).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 291 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. B. & Maclean, M. S. M. (1972). A method for screening Phaseolus genotypes for tolerance to low temperatures. Journal of Horticultural Science 47, 287–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1976). Accumulated temperature and maize development in England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, M. H. & Hackler, L. B. (1972). Nutritional improvement of food legumes by breeding. Proceedings of a Symposium sponsored by the Protein Advisory Group, and PAG statement 22, 185–92.Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1962). In search of yield. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 28, 171–8.Google Scholar
Down, E. E. & Anderson, A. L. (1956). Agronomic use of an X-ray-induced mutant. Science 124, 223–4.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Maurer, R. (1977). Crop temperature modification and yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat. Crop Science 16, 855–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, R. C., Andrews, D. J. & Hardaker, J. M. (1975). Growth and developmental studies of French beans. Annual Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1974, 65–7.Google Scholar
Hardwiok, R. C., Andrews, D. J. & Hardaker, J. M. (1976). Growth and developmental studies of navy beans. Annual Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1975, 52–3.Google Scholar
Hardwick, R. C. & Ballantine, J. E. M. (1973). Growth and developmental studies of French beans. Annual Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1972, 55–6.Google Scholar
Hubbeling, N. (1957). New aspects of breeding for disease resistance in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphyticab, 6 111–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, J. M. & Jinks, J. L. (1968). Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarisbrick, D. H., Carr, M. K. V. & Wilkes, J. M. (1976). The effect of sowing date and season on the development and yield of navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in south-east England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & De Wit, C. T. (1976). Analysis of the carbon and nitrogen limitation of soybean yields. Agronomy Journal 68, 319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanscher, J. H. (1976). Cultivar, an ambiguous term. Den Klngelige Veterinaer- Og Landbohojskole °Arsshrift. Annual Report for 1976, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
Wijandi, S. & Copeland, L. O. (1974). Effect of origin, moisture content, maturity and mechanical damage on seed and seedling vigor of beans. Agronomy Journal 66, 546–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar