Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:30:26.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Progressives and the European Left

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Melvyn Stokes
Melvyn Stokes
Affiliation:
Lecturer in American History in the Department of History, University College London, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Until comparatively recently, historians treated progressivism of the early twentieth century variety as if it were a purely American affair. In 1952, Eric F. Goldman argued that progressivism was ‘as exclusively national a movement as the United States ever knew’. But in the years that followed, a number of works appeared which challenged the validity of this narrowly national interpretation. Arthur Mann, in 1956, suggested that American reformers were much influenced by British social thought. Gertrude Almy Slichter drew attention to the European background of American reform in a 1960 dissertation. A number of essays then showed that progressivism itself could be regarded as part of an international movement. Peter F. Clarke pointed out that there had been a progressive movement in England which, in fact, predated the American equivalent. Kenneth O. Morgan, reviewing the nature of the links between British and American reformers, thought it meaningful to write in terms of ‘ Anglo-American Progressivism’. Other historians, looking at the matter in a more general, European context, were struck by the apparent similarities between American progressives, British Liberals or Labourites, and French and German socialists. George E. Mowry argued that American progressives should be regarded as part of western ‘social democracy’. Arthur A. Ekirch came to much the same conclusion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , April 1983 , pp. 5 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goldman, Eric F., Rendezvous with Destiny, A History of Modern American Reform (New York, 1952), p. 261Google Scholar.

2 Mann, Arthur, ‘British Social Thought and American Reformers of the Progressive Era’, Mississipi Valley Historical Review, 42 (03 1956), pp. 672–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slichter, Gertrude Almy, ‘European Backgrounds of American Reform, 1880–1915’, University of Illinois Ph.D. thesis, 1960Google Scholar.

3 Clarke, Peter F., ‘The Progressive Movement in England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Fifth Series, 24 (London, 1974), p. 160Google Scholar; Morgan, Kenneth O., ‘The Future at Work: Anglo-American Progressivism 1890–1917’, in Allen, H. C. and Thompson, Roger, eds., Contrast and Connection, Bicentennial Essays in Anglo-American History (London, 1976), pp. 245–271Google Scholar.

4 Mowry, George E., ‘Social Democracy, 1900–1918’, in Vann Woodward, C., ed., The Comparative Approach to American History (New York and London, 1968), pp. 271–84Google Scholar; Ekirch, Arthur A. Jr, Progressivism in America, A Study of the Era from Theodore Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson (New York, 1974), p. 12Google Scholar.

5 Bolt, Christine, The Anti-Slavery Movement and Reconstruction, A Study in Anglo-American Co-operation 1833–1877 (London, 1969), p. 84Google Scholar.

6 Temperley, Howard, British Antislavery 1833–1870 (London, 1972), p. 195Google Scholar; Bolt, , Anti-Slavery Movement, p. 24Google Scholar. The quotation is from Bolt.

7 Bolt, pp. 31, 108–09.

8 Shaw, ‘Recollections of President Gilman’, typescript marked Windsor Park, Florida, 10 June 1943, pp. 8–9, Gilman Papers, Johns Hopkins University Library. Shaw, 's article was published as ‘Local Government in America’, Fortnightly Review, n.s., 32 (10 1882), pp. 485–95Google Scholar.

9 Shaw, , ‘William T. Stead’, Review of Reviews, 45 (1912), p. 691Google Scholar; Shaw, , ‘The American State and the American Man’, Contemporary Review, 51 (05 1887), pp. 695–712Google Scholar.

10 Graybar, Lloyd J., Albert Shaw of the Review of Reviews, An Intellectual Biography (Lexington, Ky., 1974), p. 40Google Scholar. Stead, who founded the British Review of Reviews in 1890, and served as its first editor, was destined to be a figure of no small significance in Shaw's life. It was at his suggestion that Shaw, in 1891, became the editor of the American version of Review of Reviews.

11 For Bryce's influence upon Howe, see Howe, Frederic C., The Confessions of a Reformer (New York, 1925), pp. 3, 5Google Scholar.

12 Ray Stannard Baker, who covered Stead's Chicago campaign for his newspaper, claimed to have learned from him ‘a number of things, some to commend, some to avoid, that were of value to me in the years so soon to come, when I was to play a part in developing the so-called “literature of exposure”’. Baker, , American Chronicle, The Autobiography of Ray Stannard Baker (New York, 1945), p. 31Google Scholar.

13 Addams, Jane, Twenty Years at Hull-House, With Autobiographical Notes (New York, 1910), p. 69Google Scholar. Although Addams' visit to the East End was on 26 October 1883, ten days after the synopsis was published, she seems to have been unaware at that stage either of Mearns' pamphlet or the publicity Stead had given it. She only states rather vaguely in her autobiography that ‘the Pall Mall Gazette exposure started “The Bitter Cry of Outcast London”’ controversy in the same year as her visit. See Addams, , Extracts and Summary of Notebooks — First Trip to Europe (22 08 to 1 11 1883)Google Scholar, Jane Addams Papers, Swarthmore College Peace Collection; Addams, , Twenty Years, p. 69Google Scholar.

14 Wohl, Anthony S., The Eternal Slum, Housing and Social Policy in Victorian London (London, 1977), pp. 215–16Google Scholar.

15 Although none of the American progressives seems to have met Booth personally, his work — and that of Seebohm Rowntree in York — was well known to them. See Addams, Jane, Newer Ideals of Peace (New York, 1907), pp. 86–87Google Scholar; Richard T. Ely to H. W. Desmond, 22 Dec. 1904, Richard T. Ely Papers, State Historical Society of Wisconsin; Howe, Frederic C., The British City, The Beginnings of Democracy (New York, 1907), p. 310Google Scholar; booklist in folder marked ‘The Social Question — Social Evolution — Political Economy’, Walter Rauschenbusch Papers, American Baptist Historical Society, Rochester, New York; Shaw, Albert, ‘London Polytechnics and People's Palaces’, The Century Magazine, n.s., 18 (06 1890), pp. 172–73Google Scholar.

16 Washington Gladden to Children, 17 June 1888, roll 2, frames 0448–0449, microfilm edition, Washington Gladden Papers, Ohio State Historical Society; Shaw, Albert, interview with the Pall Mall Gazette, 24 and 27 11 1888Google Scholar, as reprinted in Notes, 1889–1890, Hopkins, JohnsUniversity Studies in Historical and Political Science (Baltimore, 1890), pp. 1, 3, 8Google Scholar; Addams, , Twenty Years, p. 87Google Scholar.

17 Shannon, David A., ed., Beatrice Webb's American Diary 1898 (Madison, Wisconsin, 1963), pp. 108–09Google Scholar. See Ibid., pp. 10–11, for Mrs Webb's meeting with Albert Shaw while she was in New York on the same visit.

18 Addams, , Twenty Years, p. 87Google Scholar; Davis, Allen F., American Heroine, The Life and Legend of Jane Addams (New York, 1973), p. 49Google Scholar; Gladden, Washington, Recollections (Boston, 1909), pp. 353, 355–57Google Scholar.

19 Davis, , American Heroine, p. 51Google Scholar; Rader, Benjamin G., The Academic Mind and Reform, the Influence of Richard T. Ely in American Life (Lexington, Ky., 1966), p. 62Google Scholar.

20 Addams, , Twenty Years, p. 262Google Scholar.

21 Thompson, Paul, Socialists, Liberals and Labour, The Struggle for London 1885–1914 (London, 1967), pp. 81, 101, 103Google Scholar.

22 Baker, R. S., Notebook A (1892–1894), pp. 18–19Google Scholar, Ray Stannard Baker Papers, Library of Congress. Albert Shaw mentioned the success of the London Progressives in an article he wrote for his influential and widely-read Review of Reviews. See Shaw, , ‘Municipal Problems of New York and London’, Review of Reviews, 5 (02–07 1892), p. 284Google Scholar.

23 Clarke, Peter, Liberals and Social Democrats (Cambridge, 1978), p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clarke, ‘Progressive Movement in England’, p. 160.

24 Clarke, , Liberals and Social Democrats, pp. 60–61Google Scholar.

25 Addams, , Twenty Years, pp. 263–65Google Scholar.

26 Thompson, , Socialists, Liberals and Labour, pp. 112–14, 124, 136–37, 151–52Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., p. 103n; McBriar, A. M., Fabian Socialism and English Politics 1884–1918 (Cambridge, 1966), p. 198Google Scholar.

28 Braeman, John, ‘Charles A. Beard: The English Experience’, Journal of American Studies, 15 (08 1981), pp. 175, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Clarke, ‘Progressive Movement in England’, p. 160; Henry D. Lloyd to Addams, 23 Feb. 1896, Addams Papers.

30 Wells to Ross, 19 July 1904, Edward A. Ross Papers, State Historical Society of Wisconsin.

31 Webb to Ely, 19 Sept. 1889, Ely Papers; Webb to Ely, 21 Feb. 1894, The Letters of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Vol. II: Partnership, 1892–1912, ed. Mackenzie, Norman (Cambridge, 1978), p. 14Google Scholar.

32 Gladden to Children, 18 July 1888, roll 2, frame 0570, Gladden Papers; Howe to Lincoln Steffens, 18 May 1909, Lincoln Steffens Papers, Columbia University Library.

33 Webb to Ely, 1 Feb. 1894, Letters of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, 2, p. 13; Rauschenbusch, , ‘The Socialist Movement and the World-Wide Unrest’, Rochester Times, 16 12 1911Google Scholar, Scrapbook (1911–1912), p. 81, Rauschenbusch Papers.

34 Ely to F. M. Colby, 2 Feb. 1903, Ely Papers; cf. Howe to Steffens, 22 July 1909, Steffens Papers.

35 Ely also lectured on the subject at Johns Hopkins. One of his students there, Albert Shaw, was obliged to write a Succinct account of French and German socialism as part of his Ph.D. thesis. A week after taking his degree, Shaw started work on the Minneapolis Tribune, and deeply impressed its proprietor by what the latter thought to be his ability, at will, to dash off impromptu articles on such subjects as — European socialism. Ely, Richard T., Ground Under Our Feet: An Autabiography (New York, 1938), p. 105Google Scholar.

36 Ely, , French and German Socialism in Modern Times (New York and London, 1883), p. 20Google Scholar.

37 Interestingly, Rauschenbusch denied that this was possible. ‘If socialism ever makes headway here’, he declared, ‘it will be because there is cause for it, and it will be an American type of socialism’. Rauschenbusch, , Scrapbook, 10 (1901–1902), p. 112Google Scholar, Rauschenbusch Papers.

38 Rauschenbusch, ‘In Germany’, Scrapbook marked ‘Personals (1890–)’, Rauschenbusch Papers.

39 Ely, , French and German Socialism, introduction; pp. 14–19Google Scholar.

40 Wallace to Ely, 6 Dec. 1889, Ely Papers.

41 Rochester Times, 16 Dec. 1911, Scrapbook (1911–1912), p. 81, Rauschenbuseh Papers.

42 Howe, , British City, p. 63Google Scholar. I have changed the ‘M’ in militant to lower case.

43 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 189–191, 232Google Scholar; cf. Granville Stanley Hall, Aspects of German Culture (Boston, 1881), pp. 58–65Google Scholar.

44 Rauschenbusch, ‘In Germany’; Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 204, 209–13, 231–32Google Scholar.

45 Hall, , Aspects of German Culture, pp. 88–90, 93Google Scholar; Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 214–15Google Scholar.

46 Ely, Ibid., pp. 216–21.

47 Rauschenbusch, , ‘State Insurance in Germany’, Personals (1890–)Google Scholar; Steffens to Lou Steffens, 3 Feb. 1980, The Letters of Lincoln Steffens, Vol. I: 1889–1919, Winter, Ella and Hicks, Granville, eds. (New York, 1938), pp. 41–42Google Scholar.

48 Ray Stannard Baker was only half-joking when he remarked in 1901 that if the German workman ever seriously began to consider his position, ‘he does one of two things — he either becomes a socialist or he commits suicide. So socialism, though held down by bands of steel, is rampant everywhere in Germany.’ Baker, , Seen in Germany (New York, 1901), p. 122Google Scholar.

49 Hall, G. Stanley, Life and Confessions of a Psychologist (New York, 1927), p. 192Google Scholar; Ely, , Ground, p. 51Google Scholar.

50 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 228, 230Google Scholar.

51 Ibid., pp. 204–6, 209.

52 Addams, , Twenty Years, p. 264Google Scholar.

53 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 204, 230–31Google Scholar; Hall, , Aspects of German Culture, pp. 21, 91Google Scholar.

54 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 156–57Google Scholar.

55 Hall, , Life and Confessions, p. 222Google Scholar; Hall, , Aspects of German Culture, p. 62Google Scholar. Ely, who also admired the scientific quality of Capital, conceded that it made difficult reading, though ‘not because it is poorly written, but because it is deep’. Ely, , French and German Socialism, p. 173Google Scholar.

56 Hall, , Aspects of German Culture, p. 62Google Scholar; Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 236–37, 240Google Scholar.

57 Rauschenbusch, ‘State Insurance in Germany’.

58 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 221, 242, 244, 245Google Scholar.

59 ‘The social democracy in Germany’, Rauschenbusch wrote from the perspective of 1913, ‘has rather cowed the Christian social thinkers in Germany so that they are rather tame and do not get much beyond mild reform talk.’ Rauschenbusch to J. E. Franklin, 16 June 1913, copy in Rauschenbusch Papers.

60 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 256–57Google Scholar.

61 Rauschenbusch to Gladden, 10 Feb. 1912, roll 9, frame 0908, Gladden Papers. Also see Ely, , ‘The French Protestant Association for the Practical Study of Social Questions’, Virginia Seminary Magaine, 5 (06 1892), pp. 373–78Google Scholar.

62 Ely, , French and German Socialism, pp. 108, 128–29, 143, 145–49Google Scholar.

63 Two more of the progressives on whom this article is based lived in France for a time. Albert Shaw spent some time in Paris, studying contemporary politics, after gaining his Ph.D. He wrote articles on French topics for the Minneapolis Tribune in 1888–1889 and later for the Review of Reviews. Lincoln Steffens also lived in Paris for several months in 1891–1892.

64 Tarbell, Ida M., All in the Day's Work, An Autobiography (New York, 1941), pp. 124, 127–30Google Scholar.

65 Ibid., pp.132–33.

66 Howe, , British City, p. 214Google Scholar. Howe only referred to meeting Burns ‘in the early nineties’, but it seems clear that this must have been during his 1891 trip to Europe. See Howe, , Confessions of a Reformer, p. 32Google Scholar.

67 Addams to Mary Rozet Smith, 4 Sept. 1895, Addams Papers.

68 Howe, , British City, pp. 57–58, 63–65Google Scholar; Howe, , Confessions of a Reformer, pp. 95–98, 129Google Scholar.

69 White, William Allen, The Autobiography of William Allen White (New York, 1946), pp. 409–10Google Scholar.

70 Richard Ely, for example, assumed that the American industrial struggle was not class-based while the European one was. If the United States were to imitate European society in this respect, he warned, ‘dire evils are in store for us’. Ely, , French and German Socialism, p. 28Google Scholar.

71 Peter Filene pointed out that a movement ‘consists of persons who share a knowing relationship to one another’. Filene, Peter G., ‘An Obituary for “The Progressive Movement”’, American Quarterly, 22 (Spring 1970), p. 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar. By this definition, American and continental reformers did not constitute a movement.

72 Keir Hardie predicted a great future for him. Braeman, p. 175. Another observer was even more enthusiastic. ‘Aye! if we'd a lot o' young fellows like yon'd i' Tormden', one north-country sage reportedly remarked after hearing Beard speak at Todmorden, ‘we'd turn it upside down i' a week’ Cited in Phillips, Harlan B., ‘Charles Beard: The English Lectures, 1899’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 14 (1953), p. 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 The Liberal party split between imperialists and pro-Boers. Old I.L.P. men such as Hardie and MacDonald tended to be determinedly anti-war. The Fabians divided amongst themselves: some of the more prominent members, including George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb, gave their support to imperialism.

74 Addams, , Twenty Years, p. 266Google Scholar. Braeman suggests that one of the reasons for Beard's decision to return to the United States in 1902 was his disillusionment over the prospects for change in Britain following the Boer War. Braeman, p. 186.

75 Tom L. Johnson, progressive mayor of Cleveland, Ohio, as quoted in Mann, ‘British Social Thought and American Reformers of the Progressive Era’, p. 676.

76 White, , Autobiography, pp. 418–19Google Scholar.