Article contents
Reconstructing American Studies: Transnational Paradoxes, Comparative Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
Extract
While American Studies continues to be a popular subject in universities and colleges on both sides of the Atlantic, several influential critics have recently expressed some sense that its methodological direction appears increasingly uncertain. To be sure, there never was a time when this field's methodology has not been problematic: arguments about what American Studies should include, and indeed whether its eclectic narratives could reasonably be said to constitute an academic discipline at all, have circulated many times since the rapid growth of the subject in the late 1940s. This development has been well documented over the last few years. Philip Gleason has shown how the end of the Second World War led to a patriotic desire to identify certain specifically American values and characteristics; this led to various mythic idealizations of the American spirit in seminal critical works of the 1950s; and this in turn was followed by a more empiricist reaction in the 1960s and 1970s, when social scientists and historians of popular culture were concerned to demystify those earlier, holistic images of a “virgin land” and an “American Adam.” These are old controversies, and I do not intend to rehearse them in detail here. From the perspective of the early 1990s, what is more urgent is to consider how, or indeed if, the field of American Studies might continue to make an important contribution to our understanding of the United States, as well as a significant intervention within the world of learning more generally.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994
References
1 Gleason, Philip, “World War II and the Development of American Studies,” American Quarterly, 36 (1984), 343–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a good survey of American Studies in the 1950s, see Pease, Donald E., “New Americanists: Revisionist Interventions into the Canon,” boundary 2, 17 (1990), 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Wise, Gene, “‘Paradigm Dramas’ in American Studies: A Cultural and Institutional History of the Movement,” American Quarterly, 31 (1979), 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gunn, Giles, The Culture of Criticism and the Criticism of Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), 147Google Scholar; Culler, Jonathan, Framing the Sign: Criticism and Its Institutions (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1988), 8Google Scholar; King, Richard, “Present at the Creation: Marcus Cunliffe and American Studies,” Journal of American Studies, 26 (1992), 265–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Denning, Michael, “‘The Special American Conditions’: Marxism and American Studies,” American Quarterly, 38 (1986), 356–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 McGerr, Michael, “The Price of the ‘New Transnational History,’” American Historical Review, 96 (1991), 1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Tyrrell, Ian, “American Exceptionalism in an Age of International History,” American Historical Review, 96 (1991), 1031–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pease, Donald E., “National Identities, Postmodern Artifacts, and Postnational Narratives,” boundary 2, 19 (1992), 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Jameson, Fredric, Signatures of the Visible (New York: Routledge, 1990), 35Google Scholar, and “The State of the Subject (III),” Critical Quarterly, 29, No. 4 (1987), 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Bradbury, Malcolm, “How I Invented America,” Journal of American Studies, 14 (1980), 133, 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Durgnat, Raymond, Eros in the Cinema (London: Calder and Boyars, 1966), 95–96Google Scholar.
9 Wilson, Rob, “Techno-euphoria and the Discourse of the American Sublime,” boundary 2, 19 (1992), 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Cunliffe, Marcus, “American Watersheds,” American Quarterly, 13 (1961), 492, 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Bradbury, Malcolm, The Modern American Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), 7Google Scholar; Lawson-Peebles, Robert, Landscape and Written Expression in Revolutionary America: The World Turned Upside Down (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 62Google Scholar.
12 Denning, “‘The Special American Conditions,’” 363.
13 Jehlen, Myra, Introduction, Ideology and Classic American Literature, ed. Bercovitch, Sacvan and Jehlen, Myra (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 1Google Scholar; Bercovitch, Sacvan, “The Problem of Ideology in American Literary History,” Critical Inquiry, 12 (1986), 652CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Jehlen, 10.
15 Derrida, Jacques, “Onto-Theology of National-Humanism (Prolegomena to a Hypothesis),” Oxford Literary Review, 14 (1992), 11, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Wise, Gene, “Some Elementary Axioms for an American Culture Studies,” Prospects, 4 (1979), 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cowan, Michael, “Boundary as Center: Inventing an American Studies Culture,” Prospects, 12 (1987), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 Lauter, Paul, Canons and Contexts (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 3Google Scholar; West, Cornel, “The Postmodern Crisis of the Black Intellectuals,” in Cultural Studies, ed. Grossberg, Lawrence, Nelson, Cary, Treichler, Paula A. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 695Google Scholar.
18 Lauter, 51, 87, 138, 135.
19 West, 689; Gallop, Jane, Reading Lacan (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), 58Google Scholar; Decker, Jeffrey Louis, “Dis-Assembling the Machine in the Garden: Antihumanism and the Critique of American Studies,” New Literary History, 23 (1992), 281–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Fisher, Philip, Introduction, The New American Studies: Essays from Representations (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), xxi–xxiiGoogle Scholar.
21 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (New York: International Publishers, 1971), 297Google Scholar; Baudrillard, Jean, America (1986), trans. Turner, Chris (London: Verso, 1988), 34Google Scholar.
22 Stephanson, Anders, “Interview with Cornel West,” in Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism, ed. Ross, Andrew (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), 272–73, 277, 281Google Scholar. Tallack, Douglas touches on the significance of Lyotard's work for American Studies in Twentieth–Century America: The Intellectual and Cultural Context (London: Longman, 1991), 324–25Google Scholar. Tallack also makes the point that debates about American postmodernism “cannot now be understood other than on a European/American axis” (324).
23 Berkhofer, Robert F. Jr, “A New Context for a New American Studies,” American Quarterly, 41 (1989), 589CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Sklar, Robert, “The Problem of An American Studies Philosophy: A Bibliography of New Directions,” American Quarterly, 28 (1975), 262Google Scholar.
25 Parrington, Vernon Louis, Main Currents in American Thought: An Interpretation of American Literature from the Beginnings to 1920 (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1930), I, iiiGoogle Scholar.
26 Cited in Susman, Warren T., “The Thirties,” in The Development of an American Culture, 2nd ed., ed. Coben, Stanley and Ratner, Lorman (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983), 259Google Scholar.
27 Bhabha, Homi K., “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation,” in Nation and Narration, ed. Bhabha, Homi K. (London: Routledge, 1990), 314Google Scholar.
28 Bowlby, Rachel, Just Looking: Consumer Culture in Dreiser, Gissing and Zola (New York: Methuen, 1985), 31Google Scholar.
29 James Clifford, “Borders/Diasporas,” American Studies Association, Costa Mesa, California, 6 November 1992.
30 Gilroy, Paul, ‘There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack’: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation (1987; rpt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), 12, 157Google Scholar. Gilroy develops these ideas in The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (London: Verso, 1993)Google Scholar, which appeared too late for full consideration here.
31 Leavis, F. R., D. H. Lawrence: Novelist (New York: Knopf, 1956), 17Google Scholar; Baldick, Chris, The Social Mission of English Criticism, 1848–1932 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), 218Google Scholar.
32 Doyle, Brian, English and Englishness (London: Routledge, 1989), 83Google Scholar.
33 Iain Chambers, review of Literature, Politics and Culture in Postwar Britain, by Sinfield, Alan, Textual Practice, 5 (1991), 130Google Scholar.
34 Bercovitch, Sacvan, The Rites of Assent: Transformations in the Symbolic Construction of America (New York: Routledge, 1993), 5, 13Google Scholar; Sollors, Werner, Beyond Ethnicity: Consent and Descent in American Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 31Google Scholar.
35 Ross, Andrew, No Respect: Intellectuals and Popular Culture (New York: Routledge, 1989)Google Scholar, and Strange Weather: Culture, Science and Technology in the Age of Limits (London: Verso, 1991)Google Scholar. For the anxieties of Hall and McRobbie, see their contributions to Cultural Studies, ed. Grossberg et al.
36 Denning, Michael, Mechanic Accents: Dime Novels and Working–Class Culture in America (London: Verso, 1987)Google Scholar; Culler, Jonathan, “Comparative Literature and the Pieties,” Profession, 86 ([New York]: Modern Language Association of America, 1986), 30Google Scholar.
37 Pound, Ezra, “Provincialism the Enemy,” in Selected Prose, 1909–1965, ed. Cookson, William (London: Faber, 1973), 159–73Google Scholar.
38 Kristeva, Julia, Strangers to Ourselves (1989), trans. Roudiez, Leon S. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), 181Google Scholar.
39 Simpson, David, “Destiny Made Manifest: The Styles of Whitman's Poetry,” in Nation and Narration, ed. Bhabha, , 189Google Scholar, and The Politics of American English, 1776–1850 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 248Google Scholar.
- 40
- Cited by