Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
For more than twenty years the subject of authority has been in the forefront of discussions in the Anglican Communion and in ecumenical conversations. Authority in the Church was treated by the first Anglican Roman Catholic Commission. Both Communions recognized convergence in the Commission's reports but asked for further work. The most recent report, The Gift of Authority, is still being studied. It contains sharp challenges to both churches about their own exercise of authority. It is one thing to agree ideal statements about authority. It is quite another to move into visible unity with another church whose exercise of authority appears at odds with the ideal. If the two Communions can respond to these challenges then the suspicions that each has of the other will be alleviated and the move to visible unity made more possible. This article examines the content of the ARCIC reports and the challenges put to both Communions, arguing that there is much at stake in this conversation both for the internal life of the two Communions as well as for a life of communion in the future.
1. ‘Instruments of Communion and Decision-Making: The Development of the Consultative Process in the Anglican Communion’, in The Truth Shall Make You Free (London: Church House Publishing, 1988), pp. 293–98.Google Scholar
2. The Truth Shall Set You Free, pp. 216–18.Google Scholar
3. ‘The Virginia Report’, in Dyer, J.M., Gbonigi, E., Ramalshah, M., Symon, R., Clark, E. Gordon, The Official Report of the Lambeth Conference 1998 (Harrisburg: Morehouse Publishing, 1999), pp. 15–68.Google Scholar
4. Resolution III.8 of the 1998 Lambeth Conference, The Official Report, p. 398.Google Scholar
5. Ut Unum Sint, Encyclical Letter of the Holy Father John Paul II on Commitment to Ecumenism, 1995.
6. The Final Report of the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (London: CTS/SPCK, 1982).Google Scholar
7. The Final Report, para. 6.
8. Cf. Hill, Christopher and Yarnold, Edward (eds.), Anglicans and Roman Catholics: The Search for Unity. The ARCIC Documents and their Reception (London: SPCK, 1994).Google Scholar
9. The Gift of Authority, Authority in the Church III: An Agreed Statement by the Second Anglican-Roman Catholic Commission ARCIC (Toronto: Anglican Book Centre, 1999).Google Scholar
10. Authority in the Church I, para. 1.Google Scholar
11. Cf. The Gift of Authority, para. 5.Google Scholar
12. The Gift of Authority, para. 32.Google Scholar
13. Authority in the Church I, para. 2.Google Scholar
14. Authority in the Church I, para. 2.Google Scholar
15. Authority in the Church I, para. 15.Google Scholar
16. Authority in the Church I, para. 19.Google Scholar
17. The Gift of Authority, para. 14.Google Scholar
18. Authority in the Church I, Elucidation, para. 4.Google Scholar
19. The Truth Shall Make You Free, p. 211.Google Scholar
20. The Gift of Authority, para. 28.Google Scholar
21. The Gift of Authority, para. 29.Google Scholar
22. Authority in the Church I, para. 5.Google Scholar
23. Authority in the Church I, para. 23.Google Scholar
24. The Gift of Authority, para. 38.Google Scholar
25. Authority in the Church I, para. 9.Google Scholar
26. Authority in the Church I, para. 9.Google Scholar
27. Authority in the Church I, para. 16.Google Scholar
28. Cf. Authority in the Church I, para. 17.Google Scholar
29. Authority in the Church I, Elucidation, para. 3.Google Scholar
30. The Gift of Authority, para. 42.Google Scholar
31. The Gift of Authority, para. 43.Google Scholar
32. Authority in the Church I, para. 18.Google Scholar
33. Authority in the Church I, para. 12.Google Scholar
34. Authority in the Church I, para. 12.Google Scholar
35. Authority in the Church II, para. 29.Google Scholar
36. Authority in the Church II, para. 48.Google Scholar
37. Authority in the Church II, paras. 60–61.Google Scholar
38. Cf. Authority in the Church II, para. 62.Google Scholar
39. May They All Be One, Response of the House of Bishops of the Church of England to Ut Unum Sint (London: Church House Publishing, 1997), p. 18.Google Scholar