Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:04:55.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the Church of England have a Theology of General Synod?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Mark Chapman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
From the Review Editor
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 15 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

This paper is a modified version of a lecture delivered at a conference organised by Affirming Catholicism entitled ‘Episcopally-Led, Synodically Governed’ on 24 November 2012 at St Mary-le-Bow Church, London. It took place four days after the rejection by the House of Laity in the General Synod of the measure that would have allowed the ordination of women as bishops.

2.

Mark Chapman is Vice Principal of Ripon College, Cuddesdon, Oxford and the Review Editor for the Journal of Anglican Studies.

References

3. On the context and fallout of Newman's article see Douglas Woodruff's introduction in Lord Acton, Essays on Church and State (London: Hollis and Carter, 1952), esp. pp. 21–23.Google Scholar

4. Letter from Talbot to Manning, 25 April 1867, cited in E.S. Purcell, Life of Cardinal Manning (London, 1896), II, p. 318.Google Scholar

5. Words of Peace and Justice: Addressed to the Catholic Clergy and Laity of the London District, on the Subject of Diplomatic Relations with the Holy See (London: Dolman, 1848). On this, see Flint, James P., Great Britain and the Holy See: The Diplomatic Relations Question, 1846–1852 (Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2003), ch. 4; Saho Matsumoto-Best, Britain and the Papacy in the Age of Revolution, 1846–1851 (Woodbridge: Royal Historical Society, 2003); Wilfrid Ward, The Life and Times of Cardinal Wiseman(2 vols.; London: Longmans, 1912), I, ch. 16.Google Scholar

6. Words of Peace and Justice, p. 15.Google Scholar

7. Words of Peace and Justice, p. 16.Google Scholar

8. Letter from Hooper to Bullinger, 5 February 1550, in Hastings Robinson (ed.), Original letters relative to the English Reformation: written during the reigns of King Henry VIII., King Edward VI., and Queen Mary: chiefly from the archives of Zurich (2 vols.; Cambridge: University Press for the Parker Society, 1846–47), I, p. 76.Google Scholar

9. See Kemp, Eric, Counsel and Consent: Aspects of the Government of the Church as Exemplified in the History of the English Provincial Synods (London: SPCK, 1961), esp. pp. 63–142.Google Scholar

10. Hinchliff, Peter, ‘Laymen in Synod: An Aspect of the Beginnings of Synodical Government in South Africa’. in G.J. Cuming and Derek Baker (eds.), Studies in Church History. VII. Councils and Assemblies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971), pp. 321–327), at p. 327.Google Scholar

11. Kemp, Counsel and Consent, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

12. Oakley, Francis, The Conciliarist Tradition: Constitutionalism in the Catholic Church, 1300–1870 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003); and Paul Valliere, Conciliarism: A History of Decision-Making in the Church (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

13. See Kemp, esp. pp. 87–112. See also the 1902 Report: The Position of the Laity in the Church Being the Joint Committee of the Convocation of Canterbury (1902) (reprint with an introduction by Norman Sykes, Westminster; Church Information Board, 1952).Google Scholar

14. Radner, Ephraim, A Brutal Unity: The Spiritual Politics of the Christian Church (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2012), p. 4.Google Scholar

15. Nicholls, David, ‘Trinity and Conflict’, Theology XCVI (1993), pp. 19–27 (19).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. See my essay, ‘The Social Doctrine of the Trinity: Some Problems’, Anglican Theological Review 83. 2 (2001), pp. 239-54.

17. Bosch, David Jacobus, Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1991), e.g. p. 390.Google Scholar

18. This approach is exemplified, for example, by Colin Gunton, The Promise of Trinitarian Theology (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1993); The One, The Three and the Many: God, Creation and the Culture of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993); Paul S. Fiddes, Participating in God: A Pastoral Doctrine of the Trinity (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2000) and Moltmann, Jürgen, The Trinity and the Kingdom of God (London: SCM Press, 1981).Google Scholar

19. Review Group by the Standing Committee of the General Synod, Synodical Government in the Church of England: A Review (London: Church House Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar

20. The report, Government by Synod (London: Church Information Office, 1966), deliberately avoided theology since it sought to create a General Synod from the Church Assembly without the need for parliamentary legislation.Google Scholar

21. Archbishops’ Commission on the Organisation of the Church of England, Working as One Body (London: Church House Publishing, 1995), §1.6.Google Scholar

22. Archbishops’ Group on the Episcopate, Episcopal Ministry (London: Church House Publishing, 1990), §19.Google Scholar

23. Working as One Body, §1.10-25.Google Scholar

24. Working as One Body, §1.25.Google Scholar

25. Synodical Government in the Church of England, §2.8.Google Scholar

26. brev. 3.20; c. Don. 9.12; doc. Chr. 3.32; cf. civ. Dei 18.49. The Augustine references are cited according to the schedule in Fitzgerald OSA, Allan D., Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), pp. xxxv-l.Google Scholar

27. ‘The Christian, the Political and the Academic’, On Secularization: Towards a Revised General Theory (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005), pp. 185–199 (191).Google Scholar

28. A Brutal Unity, p. 264.Google Scholar

29. For a description of the complex passage of the women bishops’ legislation see http://www.churchofengland.org/our-views/women-bishops.aspx (accessed 2 December 2012).Google Scholar

30. Cited in Valliere, Paul, Conciliarism: A History of Decision-Making in the Church (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), p. 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31. Archbishop's retreat addresses, July 2012 at: http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1739/the-archbishops-retreat-addresses-parts-iii-iv-v (accessed 2 December 2012).Google Scholar

32. Valliere, Conciliarism, pp. 192–93.Google Scholar

33. Conciliarism, p. 209.Google Scholar

34. Conciliarism, p. 235.Google Scholar

35. See my essay, ‘American Catholicity and the National Church: The Legacy of William Reed Huntington’, Sewanee Theological Review (forthcoming, 2013).Google Scholar

36. Cited in Iremonger, F.A., William Temple (London: Oxford University Press, 1948), p. 275.Google Scholar

37. Conciliarism, p. 112.Google Scholar

38. Colin Podmore, Aspects of Anglican Identity, p. 103.Google Scholar

39. Kemp, Counsel and Consent, pp. 176-231.Google Scholar

40. Letter from an unnamed correspondent to Hoare, 23 October 1851, in Sweet, J. B., A Memoir of the late Henry Hoare Esq. MA, with a narrative of the church movements with which he was concerned from 1848 to 1865 and more particularly the revival of Convocation (London: Rivington's, 1865), p. 308.Google Scholar

41. Podmore, Colin, ‘The Baptismal Revolution in the American Episcopal Church: Baptismal Ecclesiology and the Baptismal Covenant’, Ecclesiology, 6 (2010), pp. 8–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. The Archbishops’ Committee on Church and State, Report (London: SPCK, 1916), p. 31. It drew extensively on the earlier 1902 report on the laity in the church.Google Scholar

43. Chapman, Mark, Bishops, Saints and Politics: Anglican Essays (London: T & T Clark, 2007), pp. 9–32.Google Scholar

44. See Chapman, Mark, Anglican Theology (London: Continuum, 2012), ch. 1.Google Scholar