Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:01:35.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a by-product of solid state fermentation (Synergen™) on broiler performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

L. Perić  and
P. Spring
L. Perić*
Affiliation:
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Serbia
P. Spring
Affiliation:
Bern University of Applied Sciences, HAFL, Agricultural Sciences, Zollikofen, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author:lidija@polj.uns.ac.rs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of a by-product of solid state fermentation (Synergen™ (SGN), Alltech Inc, Nicholasville KY, USA) on broiler performance and health. One thousand two hundred and eighty male Ross 308 broilers were used in a 42 day pen trial. The trial was designed as a 2 × 2 factorial, with two diet specifications (standard and reformulated) plus or minus SGN (0 and 200 g/t, SGN replaced with commercial enzyme Ronozyme™ at 150 g/t) to give four dietary treatments in total in a corn-soy based diet formulated to commercial standards. Birds fed the reduced energy diets had significantly lower cumulative feed intakes at 42 d (P < 0.01) compared to those on the full specification standard diet. There were no significant differences in broiler body weight due to treatments at any age. Significant improvements (P < 0.05) in FCR, primarily due to SGN inclusion in the feed, were observed for all weekly reported data. There were no significant differences in either mortality or EPEF for any of the treatment diets. The present study indicates that SGN, a by-product of solid state fermentation (SSF) can improve feed conversion of broilers fed a corn-soy diet.

Keywords

Synergenby-productsolid state fermentationbroilerperformance
Type
Original Research
Information
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition , Volume 2 , 2013 , e5
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Ltd. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acamovic, T. (2001) Enzymes for poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 57: 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerah, A.M., Ravindran, V., Lentle, R.G. & Thomas, D.G. (2007) Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 63: 439–455.Google Scholar
Angel, R., Saylor, W.W., Mitchell, A.D., Powers, W. & Applegate, T.J. (2006) Effect of dietary phosphorus, phytase, and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on broiler chicken bone mineralization, litter phosphorus, and processing yields. Poultry Science, 85: 1200–1211.Google Scholar
Biggs, P. & Parsons, C.M. (2009) The effects of whole grains on nutrient digestibilities, growth performance, and cecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations in young chicks fed ground corn-soybean meal diets. Poultry Science, 88: 1893–1905.Google Scholar
Chesson, A. (2001) Non-starch poly-saccharide degrading enzymes in poultry diets. Influence of ingredients on selection of activities. World's Poultry Science Journal, 57: 251–263.Google Scholar
Choct, M. (2006) Enzymes for the feed industry, past, present and future. World's Poultry Science Journal, 62: 5–15.Google Scholar
Cowieson, A.J., Acamovic, T. & Bedford, M.R. (2000) Enzyme supplementation of diets containing Camelina sativa meal for poultry. British Poultry Science, 41: 689–690.Google Scholar
Drew, M.D., Syed, N.A., Goldade, B.G., Laarveld, B. & van Kessel, A.G. (2004) Effects of dietary protein source and level on intestinal populations of Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 83: 414–420.Google Scholar
Ferket, P.R., van Heugten, E., van Kempen, T.A.T.G. & Angel, R. (2002) Nutritional strategies to reduce environmental emissions from nonruminants. Journal of Animal Science, 80: E168–E182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kies, A.K., van Hemert, K.H.F. & Sauer, W.C. (2001) Effect of phytase on protein and amino acid digestibility and energy utilisation. World's Poultry Science Journal, 57: 109–126.Google Scholar
Kim, J. C., Simmins, P. H., Mullan, B. P. & Pluske, J. R. (2005) The digestible energy value of wheat for pigs, with special reference to the post-weaned animal. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 122: 257–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S., Caston, L. & Summers, J.D. (1996) Broiler response to diet energy. Poultry Science, 75: 529–35.Google Scholar
Leytem, A.B., Willing, B.P. & Thacker, P.A. (2008) Phytate utilization and phosphorus excretion by broiler chickens fed diets containing cereal grains varying in phytate and phytase content. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 146: 160–168.Google Scholar
Lukić, M., Sinovec, Z., Pavlovski, Z., Cmiljanić, R. & Spasojević, I. (2002) Effect of microbial phytase in nutrition of broilers on production performance and carcass quality. Proceedings of the European Poultry Conference, Bremen, Archiv für Geflugelkunde, Band, 66: 138.Google Scholar
Mcnab, J.M. & Bernard, K. (1997) The effect of proteases (Vegpro) on the true metabolisable energy (TMEn) and true digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal. Poultry Science, 76: 133 (Abst.).Google Scholar
Murphy, R., Sartowska, K., Perić, L., Milošević, N. & Đukić-stojčić, M. (2009) The effect of a solid state fermentation technology product on the economics of egg production. Proceedings of the 17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Edinburgh, 298.Google Scholar
Nollet, L., Spring, P. & Goddeeris, B. (2011) The effect of Synergen on the performance of broilers fed reformulated diets based on two varieties of wheat. Proceedings of the 18th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Izmir, 80.Google Scholar
NRC (1994) National Research Council of the National Academies. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Edn.The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
Perić, L., Kovčin, S., Stanaćev, V. & Milošević, N. (2002) Effect of enzymes on broiler chick performance. Buletinul USAMV, 57: 245–249.Google Scholar
Perić, L., Spring, P., Đukić Stojčić, M., Bjedov, S., Milošević, N. & Rodić, V. (2013) The effect of Synergen on layer performance and egg quality when included in corn based diets. Proceedings of the 19th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Potsdam, 160.Google Scholar
STATISTICA 10 (2011) StatSoft Incorporated, 2300 East 14th Street, Tulsa, OK74104, USA.Google Scholar
Zelenka, J. (2003) Effect of pelleting on digestibility and metabolisable energy values of poultry diet. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 48: 239–242.Google Scholar