Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:53:52.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convex hulls of selected subsets of a Poisson process

Part of: General convexity Stochastic processes Geometric probability and stochastic geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Paul Blackwell
Paul Blackwell*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers sets of points from a Poisson process in the plane, chosen to be close together, and their properties. In particular, the perimeter of the convex hull of such a point set is investigated. A number of different models for the selection of such points are considered, including a simple nearest-neighbour model. Extensions to marked processes and applications to modelling animal territories are discussed.

Keywords

POINT PROCESSESMARKED POINT PROCESSESANIMAL TERRITORIES

MSC classification

Primary: 60G55: Point processes
Secondary: 60D05: Geometric probability and stochastic geometry 52A22: Random convex sets and integral geometry
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 814 - 824
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, P. J., Ball, F. G. and Blackwell, P. G (1991) A model for territory and group formation in a heterogeneous habitat. J. Theoret. Biol. 148, 445–468.Google Scholar
Blackwell, P. G. (1990) The Stochastic Modelling of Social and Territorial Behaviour. , University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Carr, G. M. and Macdonald, D. W. (1986) The sociality of solitary foragers: a model based on resource dispersion. Anim. Behav. 34, 1540–1549.Google Scholar
Diggle, P. J. (1983) Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Don, B. A. C. and Rennolls, K. (1983) A home range model incorporating biological attraction points. J. Animal Ecol. 52, 69–81.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1965) The convex hull of a random set of points. Biometrika 52, 331–343.Google Scholar
Ewer, R. F. (1968) Ethology of Mammals. Logos, London.Google Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. (1980) Table of integrals, series and products. Corrected and enlarged edition, ed. Jeffrey, A. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. and Lumsden, C. J. (1980) Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210, 732–739.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L. and Welch, B. L. (1939) On the calculation of the cumulants of the ?-distribution. Biometrika 31, 216–218.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. (1970) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions −1. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Moran, P. A. P. (1963) Geometrical Probability. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. (1978) Foraging and spatial organisation of the European badger, Meles meles L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 4, 75–89.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. and Parish, T. (1982) Factors affecting population density, group size and territory size of the European badger, Meles meles. J. Zool., Lond. 196, 31–39.Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. W. (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature, Lond. 301, 379–384.Google Scholar
Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. and Mecke, J. (1987) Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar