Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:50:17.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolutionarily stable strategies of diploid populations with semi-dominant inheritance patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

R. Cressman  and
W. G. S. Hines
R. Cressman*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
W. G. S. Hines*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1.
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The assumption of arbitrary and biologically implausible inheritance patterns in sexual diploid populations can yield population models in which convergence of a population's mean strategy to an evolutionarily stable strategy will not occur, even though this strategy is attainable with the correct choice of gametic frequencies. The present paper investigates the effect of imposing a simplifying and biologically reasonable restriction on the assumed inheritance patterns; namely, that dominance or underdominance occurs.

Keywords

SEXUAL DIPLOID POPULATIONSTRATEGY DOMINANCESTRATEGY UNDER DOMINANCEANIMAL CONFLICT MODELSCOMPLEX POPULATIONS
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1984 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was partially supported by NSERC operating grants A5247 (R.C.) and A6187 (W.G.S.H.)

References

[1] Akin, E. (1980) Domination or equilibrium. Math. Biosci. 50, 239–250.Google Scholar
[2] Akin, E. and Hofbauer, J. (1982) Recurrence of the unfit. Math. Biosci. 61, 51–62.Google Scholar
[3] Bishop, D. T. and Cannings, C. (1976) Models of animal conflict. Adv. Appl. Prob. 8, 616–621.Google Scholar
[4] Hines, W. G. S. (1980) Three characterizations of population strategy stability. J. Appl. Prob. 17, 333–340.Google Scholar
[5] Hines, W. G. S. (1980) An evolutionary stable strategy for randomly mating diploid populations. J. Theoret. Biol. 87, 379–384.Google Scholar
[6] Hines, W. G. S. (1982) Strategy stability in complex randomly mating diploid populations. J. Appl. Prob. 19, 653–659.Google Scholar
[7] Hines, W. G. S. and Bishop, D. T. (1984) The local stability of an evolutionarily stable strategy in a diploid population. J. Appl. Prob. 21 (2).Google Scholar
[8] Hines, W. G. S. and Bishop, D. T. Reported by W. G. S. Hines at the Animal Conflicts Workshop, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 1982.Google Scholar
[9] Maynard Smith, J. (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J. Theoret. Biol. 47, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Taylor, P. D. and Jonker, L. B. (1978) Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosci. 40, 145–156.Google Scholar
[11] Treisman, M. (1981) Evolutionary limits to the frequency of aggression between related or unrelated conspecifics in diploid species with simple Mendelian inheritance. J. Theoret. Biol. 93, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed