Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:23:07.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extinction probability, regularity and asymptotic growth of Markovian populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Norbert Lenz*
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
*
Postal address: Fachbereich Mathematik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz, 6500 Mainz, Postfach 3980, W. Germany.

Abstract

The distribution of the maximum and the extinction probability for a Markovian population is derived. Asymptotic growth is described, using the sequence of sojourn times. A regularity criterion for the processes under consideration exists under certain assumptions. For a class of processes with specific population-dependent transition rates the asymptotic behaviour is given explicitly.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chung, K. L. (1967) Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Harris, T. E. (1963) The Theory of Branching Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
John, P. W. M. (1957) Divergent time homogenous birth and death processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 514517.Google Scholar
Krickeberg, K. (1963) Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie. Teubner, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Waugh, W. A. O'N. (1970) Uses of the sojourn time series for the Markovian birth processes. Proc. 6th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. 3, 501514.Google Scholar
Waugh, W. A. O'N. (1972) Taboo extinction, sojourn times, and asymptotic growth for the Markovian birth and death process. J. Appl. Prob. 9, 486506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolotarev, V. M. (1954) On a problem from the theory of branching random processes (in Russian). Uspehi Math. Nauk 9 (60), 147156.Google Scholar