Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:01:58.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the comparison of Shapley values for variance and standard deviation games

Part of: Linear inference, regression Game theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2021

Marcello Galeotti  and
Giovanni Rabitti
Marcello Galeotti*
Affiliation:
University of Florence
Giovanni Rabitti*
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University
*
*Postal address: Department of Statistics, Informatics and Applications, University of Florence, Via delle Pandette 9, 50127 Florence, Italy. Email address: marcello.galeotti@unifi.it
**Postal address: Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics, Heriot-Watt University and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, UK. Email address: g.rabitti@hw.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Motivated by the problem of variance allocation for the sum of dependent random variables, Colini-Baldeschi, Scarsini and Vaccari (2018) recently introduced Shapley values for variance and standard deviation games. These Shapley values constitute a criterion satisfying nice properties useful for allocating the variance and the standard deviation of the sum of dependent random variables. However, since Shapley values are in general computationally demanding, Colini-Baldeschi, Scarsini and Vaccari also formulated a conjecture about the relation of the Shapley values of two games, which they proved for the case of two dependent random variables. In this work we prove that their conjecture holds true in the case of an arbitrary number of independent random variables but, at the same time, we provide counterexamples to the conjecture for the case of three dependent random variables.

Keywords

Covariance matrixsum of random variablesvector majorizationcooperative games

MSC classification

Primary: 91A12: Cooperative games
Secondary: 62J10: Analysis of variance and covariance
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 609 - 620
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Applied Probability Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbasi, B. and Hosseinifard, S. Z. (2013). Tail conditional expectation for multivariate distributions: A game theory approach. Statist. Prob. Lett. 83, 2228–2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anily, S. and Haviv, M. (2010). Cooperation in service systems. Operat. Res. 58, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, J., GÓmez, D. and Tejada, J. (2009). Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling. Comput. Operat. Res. 36, 1726–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Hu, Z. and Tang, Q. (2020). Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem. J. Math. Econom. 91, 111–120.10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colini-Baldeschi, R., Scarsini, M. and Vaccari, S. (2018). Variance allocation and Shapley value. Methodology Comput. Appl. Prob. 20, 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipovetsky, S. and Conklin, M. (2001). Analysis of regression in game theory approach. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 17, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. et al. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Mach. Intel. 2, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marichal, J.-L. and Mathonet, P. (2013). On the extensions of Barlow–Proschan importance index and system signature to dependent lifetimes. J. Multivar. Anal. 115, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, S. and Patrone, F. (2008). Transversality of the Shapley value. TOP 16, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÜller, A., Scarsini, M. and Shaked, M. (2002). The newsvendor game has a nonempty core. Games Econom. Behav. 38, 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, A. B. (2014). Sobol’ indices and Shapley value. SIAM/ASA J. Uncert. Quant. 2, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games, eds Kuhn, H. W. and Tucker, A. W., Princeton University Press, pp. 307–317.Google Scholar
Song, E., Nelson, B. L. and Staum, J. (2016). Shapley effects for global sensitivity analysis: Theory and computation. SIAM/ASA J. Uncert. Quant. 4, 1060–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar