Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:19:51.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the expected time to ruin and the expected dividends when dividends are paid while the surplus is above a constant barrier

Part of: Special processes Stochastic processes Mathematical economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Esther Frostig
Esther Frostig*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
*
∗Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Haifa, 31905, Israel. Email address: frostig@stat.haifa.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the expected time to ruin in a risk process in which dividends are paid when the surplus is above the barrier. We consider the case in which the dividend rate is smaller than the premium rate. We obtain results for the classical compound Poisson risk process with phase-type claim size. When the ruin probability is 1, we derive the expected time to ruin and the expected dividends paid. When the ruin probability is less than 1, these quantities are derived conditioning on the event that ruin occurs.

Keywords

Risk processruin probabilityphase-type distributionstopping timemartingaleM/G/1 queuebusy periodidle periodPH/M/1 queuefluid modelchange of measureLundberg coefficient

MSC classification

Primary: 91B30: Risk theory, insurance
Secondary: 60K25: Queueing theory 60G40: Stopping times; optimal stopping problems; gambling theory 60G44: Martingales with continuous parameter
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 595 - 607
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 2005 

References

Asmussen, S. (1989). Exponential families generated by phase-type distributions and other Markov lifetimes. Scand. J. Statist. 16, 319–334.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (1992). Phase-type representations in random walk and queueing problems. Ann. Appl. Prob. 20, 772–789.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (2000). Ruin Probabilities (Adv. Ser. Statist. Sci. Appl. Prob. 2). World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied Probability and Queues (Appl. Math. (New York) 51), 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. and Kella, O. (2000). A multi-dimensional martingale for Markov additive processes and its applications. Adv. Appl. Prob. 32, 376–393.Google Scholar
Bowers, N. L. et al. (1986). Actuarial Mathematics. Society of Actuaries, Schaumburg, IL.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H. (1970). Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
De Finetti, B. (1957). Su un impostazione alternativa della teoria collectiva del rischio. Trans. XV Internat. Congr. Actuaries 2, 433–443.Google Scholar
Dickson, D. C. M. and Gray, J. R. (1984a). Approximations to ruin probability in the presence of an upper absorbing barrier. Scand. Actuarial J. 1984, 105–115.Google Scholar
Dickson, D. C. M. and Gray, J. R. (1984b). Exact solutions for ruin probability in the presence of an absorbing upper barrier. Scand. Actuarial J. 1984, 174–186.Google Scholar
Frostig, E. (2004). Upper bounds on the expected time to ruin and on the expected recovery time. Adv. Appl. Prob. 36, 377–397.Google Scholar
Frostig, E. (2005). The expected time to ruin in a risk process with constant barrier via martingale. To appear in Insurance Math. Econom. Google Scholar
Gerber, H. U. (1979). An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory (S. S. Heubner Foundation Monogr. Ser. 8). Irwin, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. U. and Shiu, E. S. W. (1998). On the time value of ruin. N. Amer. Actuarial J. 2, 48–78.Google Scholar
Irbäck, J. (2003). Asymptotic theory for a risk process with high dividend barrier. Scand. Actuarial J. 2003, 97–118.Google Scholar
Kella, O., Perry, D. and Stadje, W. (2003). A stochastic clearing model with a Brownian and a compound Poisson component. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 17, 1–22.Google Scholar
Lin, X. S., Willmot, G. E. and Drekic, S. (2003). The classical risk model with constant dividend barrier: analysis of the Gerber–Shiu discounted penalty function. Insurance Math. Econom. 33, 551–566.Google Scholar
Neuts, M. F. (1981). Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models. An Algorithmic Approach (Johns Hopkins Ser. Math. Sci. 2). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. U. (1997a). Foundations of Queueing Theory. Kluwer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. U. (1997b). Stochastic Storage Processes. Queues, Insurance Risk, Dams, and Data Communication (Appl. Math. (New York) 15). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Ross, S. M. (1983). Stochastic Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Ross, S. M. and Seshadri, S. (1999). Hitting time in an M/G/1 queue. J. Appl. Prob. 36, 934–940.Google Scholar
Segerdahl, C.-O. (1970). On some distributions in time connected with the collective theory of risk. Scand. Actuarial J. 1970, 167–192.Google Scholar
Wang, N. and Politis, K. (2002). Some characteristics of a surplus process in the presence of an upper barrier. Insurance Math. Econom. 30, 231–241.Google Scholar