Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:03:34.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the extension of signature-based representations for coherent systems with dependent non-exchangeable components

Part of: Design of experiments Distribution theory - Probability Operations research and management science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2020

Jorge Navarro  and
Juan Fernández-Sánchez
Jorge Navarro*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia
Juan Fernández-Sánchez*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Almería
*
*Postal address: Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. Email: jorgenav@um.es
**Postal address: Grupo de Investigación de Análisis Matemático, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. Emails: juanfernandez@ual.es, jfsjufesa2@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The signature representation shows that the reliability of the system is a mixture of the reliability functions of the k-out-of-n systems. The first representation was obtained for systems with independent and identically distributed (IID) components and after it was extended to exchangeable (EXC) components. The purpose of the present paper is to extend it to the class of systems with identically distributed (ID) components which have a diagonal-dependent copula. We prove that this class is much larger than the class with EXC components. This extension is used to compare systems with non-EXC components.

Keywords

Signaturecopulastochastic ordersk-out-of-n systems

MSC classification

Primary: 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings 62K10: Block designs
Secondary: 90B25: Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 429 - 440
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing (International Series in Decision Processes). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Bruckner, A. M., Bruckner, J. B. and Thomson, B. S. (1997). Real Analysis. Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar
Durante, F. and Sempi, C. (2016). Principles of Copula Theory. CRC/Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Durante, F., Fernández-Sánchez, J. and Sempi, C. (2012). Sklar’s theorem obtained via regularization techniques. Nonlinear Anal. 75, 769–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durante, F., Fernández-Sánchez, J. and Trutschnig, W. (2015). A typical copula is singular. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 430, 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durante, F., Fernández-Sánchez, J. and Trutschnig, W. (2016). Baire category results for exchangeable copulas. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 284, 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, K., Mukerjee, H. and Samaniego, F. J. (1999). The ‘signature’ of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Res. Logistics 46, 507–523.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Li, X. (2013). Stochastic Orders in Reliability and Risk. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindqvist, B. H., Samaniego, F. J. and Wang, N. (2019). Preservation of the mean residual life order for coherent and mixed systems. J. Appl. Prob. 56, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A. and Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Navarro, J. (2018). Stochastic comparisons of coherent systems. Metrika 81, 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. and Rubio, R. (2011). A note on necessary and sufficient conditions for ordering properties of coherent systems with exchangeable components. Naval Res. Logistics 58, 478–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. and Rychlik, T. (2007). Reliability and expectation bounds for coherent systems with exchangeable components. J. Multivariate Anal. 98, 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., del Águila, Y., Sordo, M. A. and Suárez-Llorens, A. (2013). Stochastic ordering properties for systems with dependent identically distributed components. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 29, 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Ruiz, J. M. and Sandoval, C. J. (2007). Properties of coherent systems with dependent components. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods 36, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J., Balakrishnan, N. and Bhattacharya, D. (2008). Applications and extensions of system signatures in engineering reliability. Naval Res. Logistics 55, 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Okolewski, A. (2017). Extremal properties of order statistic distributions for dependent samples with partially known multidimensional marginals. J. Multivariate Anal. 160, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxtoby, J. C. (1980). Measure and Category: A Survey of the Analogies between Topological and Measure Spaces, 2nd edn (Graduate Texts in Mathematics 2). Springer, New York and Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putter, H. and van Zwet, W. R. (1997). On a set of the first category. In Festschrift for Lucien Le Cam: Research Papers in Probability and Statistics, eds D. Pollard et al., pp. 315–323. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychlik, T., Navarro, J. and Rubio, R. (2018). Effective procedure of verifying stochastic ordering of system lifetimes. J. Appl. Prob. 55, 1261–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F. J. (1985). On the IFR closure theorem. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F. J. (2007). System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic Orders (Springer Series in Statistics). Springer, New York.Google Scholar