Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:25:33.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pair formation in a Markovian arrival process with two event labels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Marcel F. Neuts*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Attahiru Sule Alfa*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
*
Postal address: Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. Email address: marcel@mindspring.com
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V6, Canada. Email address: alfa@ee.umanitoba.ca

Abstract

The stochastic process resulting when pairs of events are formed from two point processes is a rich source of questions. When the two point processes have different rates, the resulting stochastic process has a mean drift towards either -∞ or +∞. However, when the two processes have equal rates, we end up with a null-recurrent Markov chain and this has interesting behavior. We study this process for both discrete and continuous times and consider special cases with applications in communications networks. One interesting result for applications is the waiting time of a packet waiting for a token, a special case of this pair-formation process. Pair formation by two independent Poisson processes of equal rates results in a point process that is asymptotically a Poisson process of the same rate.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (eds) (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau Standards Appl. Math. Ser. 55). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Borovkov, K. (2004). On pair and tuple formation under independent Poisson or renewal arrival processes. J. Appl. Prob. 41, 11381144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Q.-M., and Neuts, M. F. (1998). Markov chains with marked transitions. Stoch. Process. Appl. 74, 3752.Google Scholar
Latouche, G., and Ramaswami, V. (1999). Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling (ASA-SIAM Ser. Statist. Appl. Prob.). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuts, M. F. (1981). Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models (Johns Hopkins Ser. Math. Sci. 2). John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Neuts, M. F. (1989). Structured Stochastic Matrices of M/G/1 Type and Their Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Sengupta, B. (1990). Phase-type representations for matrix-geometric solutions. Commun. Statist. Stoch. Models 6, 163167.Google Scholar