Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:19:40.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rate modulation in dams and ruin problems

Part of: Markov processes Applications Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Søren Asmussen  and
Offer Kella
Søren Asmussen*
Affiliation:
University of Lund
Offer Kella*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematical Statistics, University of Lund, Box 118, S-22100 Lund, Sweden.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Statistics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider a dam in which the release rate depends both on the state and some modulating process. Conditions for the existence of a limiting distribution are established in terms of an associated risk process. The case where the release rate is a product of the state and the modulating process is given special attention, and in particular explicit formulas are obtained for a finite state space Markov modulation.

Keywords

DAMSTORAGE MODELSUBORDINATORLEVY PROCESSRUIN PROBABILITYRISK THEORYSTABILITYSTOCHASTIC INTEREST

MSC classification

Primary: 60J27: Continuous-time Markov processes on discrete state spaces 62P05: Applications to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics 60K20: Applications of Markov renewal processes (reliability, queueing networks, etc.)
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , September 1996 , pp. 523 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supported in part by grant 372/93–1 from The Israel Science Foundation.

References

[1] Asmussen, S. (1996) Ruin Probabilities. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
[2] Asmussen, S. and Schock Petersen, S. (1989) Ruin probabilities expressed in terms of storage processes. Adv. Appl Prob. 20, 913–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Brockwell, P. J., Resnick, S. I. and Tweedie, R. L. (1982) Storage processes with general release rule and additive inputs. Adv. Appl. Prob. 14, 392–433.Google Scholar
[4] Clifford, P. and Sudbury, A. (1985) A sample path proof of the duality for stochastically monotone Markov processes. Ann. Prob. 13, 558–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Embrechts, P., Jensen, J. L., Maejima, M. and Teugels, J. L. (1985) Approximations for compound Poisson and Polya processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 17, 623–637.Google Scholar
[6] Franken, P., König, D., Arndt, U. and Schmidt, V. (1982) Queues and Point Processes. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[7] Harrison, J. M. (1977) Ruin problems with compounding assets. Stock Proc. Appl. 5, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Harrison, J. M. and Resnick, S. I. (1977) The recurrence classification of risk and storage processes. Math. Operat. Res. 3, 57–66.Google Scholar
[9] Kaspi, H. (1984) Storage processes with Markov additive input and output. Math. Operat. Res. 9, 424–440.Google Scholar
[10] Prabhu, N. U. (1980) Stochastic Storage Processes. Queues, Insurance Risk, and Dams. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[11] Ross, S. M. (1983) Stochastic Processes. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[12] Siegmund, D. (1976) The equivalence of absorbing and reflecting barrier problems for stochastically monotone Markov processes. Ann. Prob. 4, 914–924.Google Scholar
[13] Sigman, K. (1989) One-dependent regenerative processes and queues in continuous time. Math. Operat. Res. 15, 175–189.Google Scholar
[14] Sundt, B. (1991) An Introduction to Non-Life Insurance Mathematics. Versicherungswirtschaft, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar