Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:14:55.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weak convergence to the Student and Laplace distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Christian Schluter  and
Mark Trede
Christian Schluter
Affiliation:
School of Economics, CNRS and EHESS, Aix-Marseille Université, Centre de la Vieille Charité, 13002 Marseille, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One often observed empirical regularity is a power-law behavior of the tails of some distribution of interest. We propose a limit law for normalized random means that exhibits such heavy tails irrespective of the distribution of the underlying sampling units: the limit is a t-distribution if the random variables have finite variances. The generative scheme is then extended to encompass classic limit theorems for random sums. The resulting unifying framework has wide empirical applicability which we illustrate by considering two empirical regularities in two different fields. First, we turn to urban geography and explain why city-size growth rates are approximately t-distributed, using a model of random sector growth based on the central place theory. Second, turning to an issue in finance, we show that high-frequency stock index returns can be modeled as a generalized asymmetric Laplace process. These empirical illustrations elucidate the situations in which heavy tails can arise.

Keywords

Limit theoremcity-size growthhigh-frequency return process
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 121 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Shephard, N. (2001). Modelling by Lévy processes for financial econometrics. In Lévy Processes, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, pp. 283–318. Google Scholar
[2]Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Teugels, J. and Segers, J. (2004). Statistics of Extremes: Theory and Applications. John Wiley, Chichester. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (1996). Count data models for financial data. In Statistical Methods in Finance (Handbook Statist. 14), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 363–391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Christaller, W. (1966). Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google Scholar
[5]Clark, P. K. (1973). A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica 41, 135–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant. Finance 1, 223–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Córdoba, J. C. (2008). A generalized Gibrat's law. Internat. Econom. Rev. 49, 1463–1468. Google Scholar
[8]Dekkers, A. L. M., Einmahl, J. H. J. and de Haan, L. (1989). A moment estimator for the index of an extreme-value distribution. Ann. Statist. 17, 1833–1855. Google Scholar
[9]Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf's law for cities: an explanation. Quart. J. Econom. 114, 739–767. Google Scholar
[10]Gnedenko, B. V. and Kolmogorov, A. N. (1968). Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google Scholar
[11]Gnedenko, B. V. and Korolev, V. Y. (1996). Random Summation: Limit Theorems and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar
[12]Grothe, O. and Schmidt, R. (2010). Scaling of Lévy–Student processes. Physica A 389, 1455–1463. Google Scholar
[13]Kotz, S., Kozubowski, T. J. and Podgórski, K. (2001). The Laplace Distribution and Generalizations. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. Google Scholar
[14]Kozubowski, T. J. and Podgórski, K. (2009). Distributional properties of the negative binomial Lévy process. Prob. Math. Statist. 29, 43–71. Google Scholar
[15]Kozubowski, T. J., Podgórski, K. and Rychlik, I. (2013). Multivariate generalized Laplace distribution and related random fields. J. Multivariate Anal. 113, 59–72. Google Scholar
[16]Madan, D. B. and Seneta, E. (1990). The variance gamma (V.G.) model for share market returns. J. Business 63, 511–524. Google Scholar
[17]Mori, T., Nishikimi, K. and Smith, T. E. (2008). The number-average size rule: a new empirical relationship between industrial location and city size. J. Regional Sci. 48, 165–211. Google Scholar
[18]Pollard, D. (1984). Convergence of Stochastic Processes. Springer, New York. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Rényi, A. (1976). A characterization of the Poisson process. In Selected Papers of Alfréd Rényi, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 622–627. Google Scholar
[20]Scheffler, C. (2008). A derivation of the EM updates for finding the maximum likelihood parameter estimates of the Student's t distribution. Working Paper. Google Scholar
[21]Schluter, C. and Trede, M. (2014). Zipf, Gibrat, Fisher and Tippett: size distributions reconsidered. Submitted. Google Scholar
[22]Smith, R. L. (1987). Estimating tails of probability distributions. Ann. Statist. 15, 1174–1207. Google Scholar