Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:07:11.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization, Transnationalism, and “Mobile Societies” from a Sociological Perspective: Comments on Engseng Ho's “Inter-Asian Concepts for Mobile Societies”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2017

Jaeeun Kim
Jaeeun Kim*
Affiliation:
Jaeeun Kim (jaeeunk@umich.edu) is Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology and Korea Foundation Assistant Professor of Korean Studies at the University of Michigan.
Get access

Extract

Speaking across disciplines is always easier said than done. Engseng Ho's thought-provoking article strives to do just that (and achieves the goal nicely), with its broad overview of the literature, the numerous examples that it draws on, and the ambitious conceptual innovations it proposes. As the only sociologist invited to comment on Ho's article, I see my task as bringing Ho's article into fruitful conversation with my own discipline, which is known to be indifferent (if not hostile) to area studies and which (unfortunately) remains largely missing in Ho's imagined audience. I do so by drawing on my own work and some of the theoretical developments in the broader discipline in the past two decades or so. To make intelligible where my comments are coming from, let me begin by briefly introducing what sorts of questions interest me as a sociologist.

Type
Article Commentary
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 935 - 941
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Anderson, Benedict. 1998. The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the World. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Basch, Linda, Schiller, Nina Glick, and Blanc, Christina Szanton. 1994. Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. Globalization: The Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2005. “The ‘Diaspora’ Diaspora.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté-Boucher, Karine, Infantino, Federica, and Salter, Mark B.. 2014. “Border Security as Practice: An Agenda for Research.” Security Dialogue 45(3):195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103(2):281–317.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaeeun. 2016. Contested Embrace: Transborder Membership Politics in Twentieth-Century Korea. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Matt K. 1996. The Memory of the Modern. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mezzadra, Sandro, and Neilson, Brett. 2013. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Urry, John. 1998. “The Concept of Society and the Future of Sociology.” Dansk Sociologi 9:29–41.Google Scholar
Urry, John. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar