Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:07:58.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History Is Not Destiny: Colonial Compensation Litigation and South Korea–Japan Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2022

Marie Seong-Hak Kim Open the ORCID record for Marie Seong-Hak Kim [Opens in a new window]
Marie Seong-Hak Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of History, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN, USA
*
Email: mskim@stcloudstate.edu
Get access

Abstract

Recent colonial compensation lawsuits reflect the metamorphosis of historical grievances in collective public memory into tort claims in private law. This article provides a synthetic view of the nexus of colonial law and history in South Korea–Japan relations, focusing on cross-border litigation brought by former forced laborers and victims of sexual servitude known as “comfort women” during World War II. The concept of public policy (ordre public) in Korea, which has colonial origins, has long served law courts as the standard for deciding the validity of a juristic act. But of late heavy reliance on the general clauses of law in legal proceedings has risked turning history and law into handmaids of national spirit, muddling historical accountability and legal liability. Improvement of South Korea–Japan ties should start from a more accurate understanding of colonial laws and a rounded appreciation of their shared legal history.

Keywords

colonial compensationcolonial lawcomfort womenforced laborJapanlegal historylitigationnationalismpublic policySouth Korea
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 475 - 491
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Arrington, Celeste L. 2019. “The Mechanisms behind Litigation's ‘Radiating Effects’: Historical Grievances against Japan.” Law & Society Review 53 (1): 6–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asada, Masahiko, and Ryan, Trevor. 2009. “Post War Reparations between Japan and China and Individual Claims: The Supreme Court Judgments in the Nishimatsu Construction Case and the Second Chinese ‘Comfort Women’ Case.” Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht 27:257–84.Google Scholar
Baibaishun mondai shiryō shūsei: senzenhen henshū fukkokuban [A complete collection of the materials regarding prostitution]. 2003. Vol. 20. Tokyo: Fuji Shuppan.Google Scholar
Chang, Chun-Hyŏk. 2013. “Ilbon t'ongch’i gi kangje chingyong sakŏn ŭi chungŏ pŏp” [Governing law in the cases of forced labor during the Japanese colonial era]. Kukche sabŏp yŏngu 19:157–212.Google Scholar
Chu, Chin-Yŏl. 2018. “1965 nyŏn HanIl ch’ŏnggukwŏn hyŏpchŏng gwa kaein ch’ŏnggukwŏn sakŏn ŭi kukche pŏp chaengchŏm e taehan koch'al” [A comment on international law issues in the Korean Supreme Court decisions on individual tort claims concerning Japanese colonial occupation]. Seoul kukche pŏp yŏngu 25 (2): 173–218.Google Scholar
De Becker, Joseph Ernest. 1921. The Principles and Practice of the Civil Code of Japan: A Complete Theoretical and Practical Exposition. Yokohama: Kelly & Walsh.Google Scholar
Dudden, Alexis. 2021. “The Abuse of History: A Brief Response to J. Mark Ramseyer's ‘Contracting for Sex.’” Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 19 (5). https://apjjf.org/2021/5/Dudden.html (accessed January 20, 2022).Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. 2002. “History, Memory, and the Law: The Historian as Expert Witness.” History and Theory 41 (3): 326–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1991. “Checking the Evidence: The Judge and the Historian.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Andrew, and Eckert, Carter. 2021. “Statement by Andrew Gordon and Carter Eckert Concerning J. Mark Ramseyer, ‘Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War.’” DASH (Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard), February. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37366904 (accessed January 20, 2022).Google Scholar
Guex, Samuel. 2016. “Legality or Legitimacy: Revisiting Debates on the Korea-Japan Annexation Treaties.” In The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context, edited by Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, 155–73. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Haberstroh, John. 2003. “In re World War II Era Japanese Forced Labor Litigation and Obstacles to International Human Rights Claims in U.S. Courts.” Asian Law Journal 10:253–94.Google Scholar
Ishii, Ryosuke. 1958. Japanese Legislation in the Meiji Era. Translated by Chambliss, William J.. Tokyo: Toyo Bunko.Google Scholar
Kang, Chŏng-Suk. 2010. “Ilbongun ‘wianbu'je ŭi singminsŏng yŏngu: Chosŏnin ‘wianbu’ rŭl chungsim ŭro” [A study of the colonial character of the Japanese military “comfort woman” system: Focusing on Korean ‘comfort women’]. PhD diss., Sungkyunkwan University.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, Nicholas deBelleville. 1956. “Conflicts on an Unruly Horse: Reciprocal Claims and Tolerances in Interstate and International Law.” Yale Law Journal 65 (8): 1087–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawashima, Takeyoshi. 1951. “Jinshin baibai no hōritsu kankei (1): Geishōgi maru gaka keiyaku no kōryoku ni tsuite” [Legal relations of human trafficking (1): Concerning the effect of geisha-prostitute financing contract]. Hōritsu kyōkai zasshi 68:699–712.Google Scholar
Kihara, Hiroyuki. 2019. “Regulation of Contracts according to ‘Public Policy or Good Morals’ in Japan: Focusing on the Relationship between the General Provision in the Civil Code and the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.” In More Constitutional Dimensions of Contract Law: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Cinelli, Luca Siliquini and Hutchison, Andrew, 67–92. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Kim, Chŏng-Ran. 2003. “Ilbongun ‘wianbu’ undong ŭi chŏngae wa munje insik e taehan yŏngu: Chŏngdaehyŏp ŭi hwaltong ŭl chungsim ŭro” [A study on the development and the viewpoint of “comfort women” issue in Korea: Focusing on the “Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Sexual Slavery by Japan”]. PhD diss., Ewha Womans University.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. 2012. Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. 2019a. Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges: The Courts of South Korea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. 2019b. “Custom as a Source of Law in European and East Asian Legal History.” In Comparative Legal History Handbook, edited by Modéer, Kjell Å., Masferrer, Aniceto, and Moréteau, Olivier, 186–211. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kimura, Kan. 2019. The Burden of the Past: Problems of Historical Perception in Japan-Korea Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga, Yukiko. 2016. “Between the Law: The Unmaking of Empire and Law's Imperial Amnesia.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (2): 402–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondō, Jitsuichi, ed. 1961. Taiheiyō senka shūmatsuki Chōsen no chisei [The politics of Chosŏn during the last phase of the Pacific War]. Tokyo: Chōsen Shiryō Hensankai.Google Scholar
Lee, Seokwoo, and Cho, Youngkwan. 2014. “Historical Issues between Korea and Japan and Judicial Activism: Focus on the Recent Supreme Court Decision on Japanese Forced Labor.” Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 2 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seokwoo, and Lee, Seryon. 2019. “Decision of the Korean Court on Japanese Forced Labor Re New Nippon Steel Corporation (Supreme Court, Case 2013 Da 61381, Final Judgment).” Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 7 (1): 88–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minji kanshū kaitō ishū [The compilation of replies regarding civil customs]. 1933. Edited by Chōsen Sōtokufu Chūsūin. Seoul.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kent. 1981. “The Traditional View of Public Policy and Ordre Public in Private International Law.” Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 11 (3): 591–615.Google Scholar
Nam, Hyo-Sun, et al. 2014. Ilche kangjŏm gi kangje chingyong sakŏn p'angyŏl ŭi chonghap chŏk yŏngu [Comprehensive study of judicial decisions on forced labor cases under Japanese colonial rule]. Seoul: Pagyŏngsa.Google Scholar
Pak, Chŏng-Ae. 2009. “Ilche ŭi kongch'angje sihaeng gwa sach'ang kwalli yŏngu” [State-regulated prostitution and the regulation of unlicensed prostitutes]. PhD diss., Sookmyung Womans University.Google Scholar
Pavoni, Riccardo. 2015. “Simoncioni v. Germany.” American Journal of International Law 109 (2): 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1991. “Indentured Prostitution in Imperial Japan: Credible Commitments in the Commercial Sex Industry.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 7 (1): 89–116.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark. 2021. “Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War.” International Review of Law and Economics 65:105971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resta, Giorgio, and Zeno-Zencovich, Vincenzo. 2013. “Judicial ‘Truth’ and Historical ‘Truth’: The Case of the Ardeatine Caves Massacre.” Law and History Review 31:843–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Lauren Kate. 2016. “Reshaping Japan-Korea Relations: Transnational Advocacy Networks and the Politics of Redress.” PhD diss., Australian National University.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. 2011. “Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60 (1): 57–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousso, Henry. 2002. The Haunting Past: History, Memory, and Justice in Contemporary France. Translated by Schoolcraft, Ralph W.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Soh, Chunghee Sarah. 2008. The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, Kyŏng-Ch'an. 2019. “Kangje chingyong sonhae paesang ŭi t'adangsŏng gwa HanIl ch’ŏnggukwŏn hyŏpchŏng ŭi pŏpchŏk sŏngkyŏk: Taebŏpwŏn 2018.10.30. sŏngo 2013Ta61381 chŏnwŏn habŭich'e p'angyŏl ŭl chungsim ŭro” [An assessment of forced labor compensations and the legal nature of the Korea-Japan claims agreements]. Pŏphak nonch'ong 26:323–67.Google Scholar
Song, Yŏn-Ok [Youn-Ok]. 2000. “Kōshō seido kara ‘ianfu' seido e no rekishi teki tenkai” [Historical development from the public prostitution system to the “comfort women” system]. In “Ianfu,” senji seibōryoku no jittai [“Comfort women,” the reality of wartime sexual violence], edited by Pu-Ja, Kim and Yŏn-Ok, Song, 20–41. Tokyo: Ryokufū Shuppan.Google Scholar
Song, Youn-Ok. 1997. “Japanese Colonial Rule and State-Managed Prostitution: Korea's Licensed Prostitutes.” positions: asia critique 5 (1): 171–219.Google Scholar
Stanley, Amy, Shepherd, Hannah, Chatani, Sayaka, Ambaras, David, and Szendi, Chelsea. 2021. “‘Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War’: The Case for Retraction on Grounds of Academic Misconduct.” Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 19 (5). https://apjjf.org/2021/5/ConcernedScholars.html (accessed January 20, 2022).Google Scholar
Suk, Kwang Hyun. 2018. “Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments between China, Japan and South Korea in the New Era: South Korean Law Perspective.” Frontiers of Law in China 13 (2): 171–201.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Yūko, Yŏngae, Yamashita, and Masaru, Tonomura, eds. 2006. Nihon gun “ianfu” kankei shiryō shūsei [Complete collection of materials relating to Japanese military “comfort women”]. 2 vols. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.Google Scholar
Torpey, John C. 2015. “The Political Field of Reparations.” In Historical Justice and Memory, edited by Neumann, Klaus and Thompson, Janna, 63–73. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Totsuka, Etsurō. 2004. “Senji josei ni taisuru bōryoku e no Nippon shihō no taiō, sono seika to genkai: Hakkutsu sareta Nihon gun ‘iansho’ rachi shobatsu hanketsu” [Japanese judiciary's response to violence against wartime women, its achievements and limitations: The excavated decisions of the punishment of the Japanese Army “comfort women” abduction]. Kikan sensō sekinin kenkyū 43 (Spring): 35–45, 67; 44 (Summer): 50–63.Google Scholar
Umeda, Sayuri. 2008. “Japan: WWII POW and Forced Labor Compensation Cases.” Law Library of Congress, September. https://www.loc.gov/item/2018298796/ (accessed January 21, 2022).Google Scholar
Webster, Timothy. 2019. “The Price of Settlement: World War II Reparations in China, Japan and Korea.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 51:301–28.Google Scholar
Webster, Timothy. 2020. “Disaggregating Corporate Liability: Japanese Multinationals and World War II.” Stanford Journal of International Law 56:175–217.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Seita, Kawakami, Shirō, et al. eds. 2019. Chōyō kō saiban to Nikkan seikyūken kyōtei: Kankoku daihōin hanketsu o yomitoku [Forced labor litigation and the Japan-Korea claims settlement agreement: Interpreting the Korean Supreme Court decision]. Tokyo: Gendai Jinbunsha.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, Tansho. 1943. Gaichi tōchi kikō no kenkyū [A study of the structure of governing the overseas territories]. Tokyo: Takayama Shoin.Google Scholar
Yi, Tong-Jin. 2013. “Kangje chingyong paesang ch'aegim ŭi sŏngnip yŏbu wa kŭ pŏmwi e kwanhan myŏt kaji munje” [Some questions concerning the establishment of liability for compulsory mobilization and its scope]. Seoul Taehakkyo Pŏphak 54:471–506.Google Scholar
Yoshimi, Yoshiaki. 2000. Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military during World War II. Translated by O'Brien, Suzanne. New York: Columbia University Press [Originally published as Jūgun ianfu, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995].Google Scholar
Yun, Chin-Su. 2018. “Hanguk minpŏp sang ŭi kongsŏ yangsok” [Public order and good morals in Korean civil law]. Minsa pŏphak 85:387–99.Google Scholar
Yun, Myŏng-Suk. 2003. Nihon no guntai iansho seido to Chōsen jin guntai ianfu [Japan's military comfort station system and Korean military comfort women]. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.Google Scholar