Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:43:04.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Surplus Woman”: Female Sexuality and the Concept of Endogamy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2021

Durba Mitra Open the ORCID record for Durba Mitra [Opens in a new window]
Durba Mitra*
Affiliation:
Durba Mitra (dmitra@fas.harvard.edu) is Assistant Professor of Women, Gender, and Sexuality and the Carol K. Pforzheimer Assistant Professor at the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard University.
Get access

Abstract

This essay traces the colonial origins of the concept of endogamy and its history as a foundational idea in the modern study of society in South Asia. The history of the concept of endogamy reveals how the control of female sexuality shaped the overlapping fields of Indology and ethnology. The invention and deployment of endogamy in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is discussed in the writings of key colonial writers and British administrators, such as J. F. McLennan and H. H. Risley, and Indian intellectuals, including S. V. Ketkar and B. R. Ambedkar. It argues that the modern study of caste naturalized the control of female sexuality through the uncritical use of the concept of endogamy, which Ambedkar diagnosed as the irresolvable problem of the “Surplus Woman” in 1917. The essay reflects on the long life of endogamy and the enduring problem of nonconjugal sexuality in modern social theories of South Asia.

Keywords

castecolonialismendogamyethnologygenderIndologysexualitysocial theorySouth Asiaviolence
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 3 - 26
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Ambedkar, B. R. 1915. “Ancient Indian Finance.” Master's thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R.. 1916. “National Dividend of India—A Historic and Analytical Study.” Master's thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R.. 1917. “Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development.” Indian Antiquary 46 (May): 81–95.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R.. 1925. The Evolution of Provincial Finance in British India: A Study in the Provincial Decentralization of Imperial Finance. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. “Is Homo Hierarchicus?” American Ethnologist 13 (4): 745–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arondekar, Anjali. 2016. “What More Remains: Slavery, Sexuality, South Asia.” History of the Present 6 (2): 146–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arunima, G. 2003. Here Comes Papa: Colonialism and the Transformation of Matriliny in Kerala, Malabar, c. 1850–1940. Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
Arya, Sunaina, and Rathore, Aakash Singh, eds. 2020. Dalit Feminist Theory: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bachofen, Johann Jakob. 1861. Das Mutterrecht [Mother right]. Stuttgart: Verlag von Krais & Hoffman.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Prathama. Forthcoming. “Gender, Sex and Caste in Ambedkar's Early Thought.” In The Cambridge Companion to B. R. Ambedkar, edited by Paik, Shailaja and Rao, Anupama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Uma. 2018. Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens. Delhi: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Indrani. 1999. Gender, Slavery, and Law in Colonial India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1987. An Anthropologist among Historians and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind. 1983. Patriarchal Precedents: Sexuality and Social Relations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, Krishna. 1962. “Women and Education in New India: An Interview with Dr. Irawati Karve.” Yojana 6 (14): 17–18.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. 1992. “Castes of Mind.” Representations, no. 37: 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1966. Homo Hierarchicus: Essai sur le système des castes [Homo Hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fee, Elizabeth. 1973. “The Sexual Politics of Victorian Anthropology.” Feminist Studies 1 (3–4): 23–39.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1913. Totem und Tabu: Einige Übereinstimmungen in Seelenleben der Wilden und der Neurotiker [Resemblances between the mental lives of savages and neurotics]. Leipzig: Hugo Heller & Cie.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. J. 2017. “Ethnographic Inquiry in Colonial India: Herbert Risley, William Crooke, and the Study of Tribes and Castes.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23 (3): 603–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghurye, G. S. 1932. Caste and Race in India. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Gupta, Charu. 2016. The Gender of Caste. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1820) 1991. Elements in the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, William Wilson. 1973. A Statistical Account of Bengal. Vols. 1–20. Delhi: D. K. Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jaaware, Aniket. 2018. Practicing Caste: On Touching and Not Touching. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe. 2005. Dr Ambedkar and Untouchability: Analysing and Fighting Caste. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Jones, William. 1876. The Hindu Wife, or, The Enchanted Fruit. London: Trubner and Co.Google Scholar
Karve, Irawati. (1961) 1968. Hindu Society: An Interpretation. Pune: Deshmukh Prakashan.Google Scholar
Ketkar, S. V. (1909) 1979. The History of Caste in India. Vol 1, Evidence of the Laws of Manu on the Social Conditions in India during the Third Century A.D., Interpreted and Examined, with an Appendix on Radical Defects in Ethnology. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.Google Scholar
Kruper, Adam. 1988. The Invention of Primitive Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1949. Les structures élémentaires de la parenté [The elementary structures of kinship]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Loos, Tamara. 2009. “Transnational Histories of Sexualities in Asia.” American Historical Review 114 (5): 1309–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, Andrew P., and Lyons, Harriet D.. 2004. Irregular Connections: A History of Anthropology and Sexuality. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Macdonell, Arthur Anthony. 1914. “The Early History of Caste.” American Historical Review 19 (2): 230–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, Samuel Charters. 1865. Memorials of Service in India from the correspondence of the late Major Samuel Charters Macpherson, CBI. Political Agent at Gwalior During the Mutiny, and Formerly Employed in the Suppression of Human Sacrifice in Orissa. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Madan, T. N. 1971. “On the Nature of Caste in India: A Review Symposium on Louis Dumont's Homo Hierarchicus.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 5 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine, Henry. 1861. Ancient Law. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects on the Future Improvement of Society. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2010. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, John Ferguson. 1865. Primitive Marriage: An Inquiry into the Origin of the Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Mitra, Durba. 2020. Indian Sex Life: Sexuality and the Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokkil, Navaneetha. 2018. “Visual Practices, Affect, and the Body: The Story of a Night-Vigil in Kerala, India.” Women's Studies Quarterly 46 (3–4): 158–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society; or, Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Mukharji, Projit Bihari. 2014. “From Serosocial to Sanguinary Identities: Caste, Transnational Race Science and the Shifting Metonymies of Blood Group B, India c. 1918–60,” Indian Economic and Social History Review 51 (2): 143–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paik, Shailaja. 2014. Dalit Women's Education in Modern India: Double Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramberg, Lucinda. 2014. Given to the Goddess: South Indian Devadasis and the Sexuality of Religion. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, Anupama. 2003. Gender and Caste. Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Rao, Anupama. 2009. The Caste Question: Dalits and the Politics of Modern India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rege, Sharmila. 1997. “Institutional Alliances between Sociology and Gender Studies: Story of the Crocodile and the Monkey.” Economic and Political Weekly 32 (32): 2023–27.Google Scholar
Rege, Sharmila. 2013. Against the Madness of Manu: B. R. Ambedkar's Writings on Brahmanical Patriarchy. Delhi: Navayana Publishers.Google Scholar
Risley, Herbert H. 1891. The Tribes and Castes of Bengal. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Risley, Herbert H. 1908. The People of India. Calcutta: Thacker, Spinck, and Co.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, edited by Reiter, Rayna, 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Press.Google Scholar
Seth, Suman. 2016. “Darwin and the Ethnologists: Liberal Racialism and the Geological Analogy.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 46 (4): 490–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, William Robertson. 1885. Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1952. Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George. 1987. Victorian Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. 2002. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundar, Nandini. 2007. “In the Cause of Anthropology: The Life and Work of Irawati Karve.” In Anthropology in the East: The Founders of Indian Sociology and Anthropology, edited by Uberoi, Patricia, Deshpande, Satish, and Sundar, Nandini, 360–416. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas. 1988. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uberoi, Patricia, Deshpande, Satish, and Sundar, Nandini, eds. 2007. Anthropology in the East: The founders of Indian Sociology and Anthropology. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Willey, Angela. 2017. “Monogamy's Nature: Global Sexual Science and the Secularization of Christian Marriage.” In A Global History of Sexual Science, 1880–1960, edited by Fuechtner, Veronika, Haynes, Douglas E., and Jones, Ryan M., 97–117. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar