Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:55:18.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The View from the Ghats: Traditional Exegesis of a Hindu Epic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Philip Lutgendorf
Get access

Extract

The most popular book in northern India is a Hindi retelling of the ancient tale of Prince Rām and his wife, Sītāa, composed in about A.D. 1574 by the poet-saint Tulsīdās of Banaras. Throughout a vast region with a population of more than three hundred million people, this epic of some fourteen-thousand lines has come to be regarded not only as a great masterpiece of literature but also as a religious work of the highest inspiration—a status recognized by nineteenth-century British scholars who labeled it "the Bible of North India." To its audience it is known by several names: simply the Rāmāyaṇ(borrowing the title of the Sanskrit archetype that, for Hindi speakers, it has largely supplanted); the Tulsī Rāmāyaṇ(invoking its author); and also the Mānas(The lake), which is a condensation of its true title, Rāmcaritmānas(The lake of the acts of Rām). Encountering the last name for the first time, a reader from another culture might be puzzled by its central metaphor: why should the image of a lake be so closely associated with this celebrated saga of virtue, heroism, and devotion?

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , May 1989 , pp. 272 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

IndujĀ, Avasthī. 1979. Rāmlīlā, paramparā aur śailiyām [Rāmlīlā: Tradition and Stylistic Variety]. Delhi: Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa Prakāśan.Google Scholar
Richard, Bauman. 1977. Verbal Art as Performance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bhatt, G. H., and SHAH, U. P.. 1960-1975. The Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa: Critical Edition, 7vols. Baroda: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Bulcke, C. 1977. Rāmkathā aur Tulsīdās [The Rām Story and Tulsīdās]. Allahabad: Hindustānī Ekeḍemī.Google Scholar
Bulcke, C. 1980. “Rāmacaritamānasa and Its Relevance to Modern Age.” In The Ramayana Tradition in Asia, ed. Raghavan, V., pp. 58–75. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
JayrāMDāS, DīN. 1942. Mānas rahasya [Secrets of the Mānas]. Gorakhpur: Gita Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Edgerton. 1965. The Panchatantra. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert P. 1984. The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki. Vol. 1: Bālakāṇḍa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Madan, Gopal. 1977. Tulasi Das: A Literary Biography. New Delhi: The Bookabode.Google Scholar
Govinda, Lama Anagarika. 1966. The Way of the White Clouds. London: Hutch-inson.Google Scholar
KIśORīLāL, Gupta. 1964. Gosāīm carit [Acts of the Master]. Banaras: Vānī Vitān Prakāśan.Google Scholar
MāTāPRASāD, Gupta. 1953. Tulsīdās. Allahabad: Hindī Parişad.Google Scholar
Hawley, John Stratton. 1988. “Author and Authority in the Bhakti Poetry of North India.” Journal of Asian Studies 47, no. 2:269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glen, Hayes. 1986. Private communication, November 24.Google Scholar
Hill, W. D. P. 1952. The Holy Lake of the Acts of Rāma. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, James. 1934. The Art of the Novel. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Nita, Kumar. 1988. The Artisans of Banaras: Popular Culture and Identity, 1880-1986. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jean, Leclercq. 1961. The Love of Learning and the Desire for God. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Philip, Lutgendorf. 1987. “The Life of a Text: Tulsīdās' Rāmcaritmānas in Performance.” Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bhānuśankar, Mehtā. 1982. "Udit udaygiri mañc par Raghuvar bāl patang” [Rām's rising sun on the stage of the eastern mountain]. 2 parts. Dharmayug 33, October 24:41-43; October 31:40-43.Google Scholar
Baldevprasād, Miśra. 1967. Tulsī darīan [Tulsī's philosophy]. Allahabad: Hindī Sāhitya Sammelan.Google Scholar
Srīnāth, Miśra. 1984. Kathā performance. Jānakī Mahal, Ayodhyā, April 12.Google Scholar
Pannikar, Vasudeva Laxman Shastri, ed. 1982. Brahmasūtra Saṅkara bhāsya [The Brahmasūtra with Śaṅkara's commentary]. Varanasi: Krishnadas Academy.Google Scholar
Poddār, Hanumān Prasad. 1938. śrī Rāmcaritmānas. Gorakhpur: Gita Press.Google Scholar
Ajanīnandan, Śaraṇ. 1925–1957. Mānas pīyūṣ [Nectar of the Mānas]. 12 vols. Ayodhya: Mānas Pīyūṣ Kāryālay.Google Scholar
Satchidananda, Sri Swami. 1984. Kailash Journal. Yogaville, Va.: Integral Yoga Publications.Google Scholar
Siṃha, Bhagavatī Prasād. 1975. Bhuśuṇḍī Rāmāyaṇa. 3 vols. (vol. 1) Banaras: Viśvavidyālay Prakāśan; (vols. 2, 3) Gorakhpur: Avadh Sāhitya Mandir.Google Scholar
Bhagavatī Prasād, Simha. 1980. “Bhuśundī Rāmāyana and Its Influence on the Medieval Rāmāyana Literature.” In The Ramayana Tradition in Asia, ed. Raghavan, V., pp. 475–504. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
Rāmnārāyan, Śukla. 1983. Kathā performance. Saṅkaṭ Mocan Hanumān Temple, Banaras, July 31.Google Scholar
Rāmkiṅkar, Upādhyāy. 1982. Kathā performance. Ayodhya, December 20.Google Scholar
Charlotte, Vaudeville. 1955. Étude sur les Sources et la Composition du Rāmāya ṇ de TulsīDās [A Study of the origins and the composition of the Rāmāyaṇ of Tulsī Dās]. Paris: A. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar