Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-16T16:10:11.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOW INTELLECTUAL IS CHESS? – A REPLY TO HOWARD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2006

MERIM BILALIĆ  and
PETER McLEOD
MERIM BILALIĆ
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
PETER McLEOD
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Howard’s (2005) claim that male dominance in chess is ‘consistent with the evolutionary psychology view that males predominate at high achievement levels at least partly because of ability differences’ (p. 378) is based on the premise that top level chess skill depends on a high level of IQ and visuospatial abilities. This premise is not supported by empirical evidence. In 1927 Djakow et al. first showed that world-class chess players do not have exceptional intellectual abilities. This finding has subsequently been confirmed many times. Different participation rates, or differences in the amount of practice, motivation and interest for chess in male and female chess players, may provide a better explanation for gender differences in chess performance.

Type
Debate
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , May 2006 , pp. 419 - 421
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)