Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:46:11.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of Coital Patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

J. C. Barrett
J. C. Barrett
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, W.C.1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Data concerning occasions of coitus were recorded by 241 married couples who had sought advice from the Catholic Marriage Advisory Council about the basal body temperature method of regulating births. The present analysis deals with the 6 days of the post-ovulatory phase which are considered to be least affected by intended birth regulation. The distribution among couples of coital frequencies is tabulated by age of wife; the mean frequency during the 6 days is 1·8 (Table 2) but this value may be influenced by the fact that some couples had avoided coitus in the pre-ovulatory phase. The hypothesis is examined that the probability of coitus on any day is unaffected by whether or not coitus occurred on the previous day. Sufficient data are available to show, as expected, that not all couples behave in the way described by this hypothesis. It is estimated that for about a third of the couples the probability of coitus is decreased if it occurred on the previous day (alternators). There are also significant numbers for whom it is increased (persisters), besides those conforming to the hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1970 , pp. 351 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, J. & Marshall, J. (1970) The relationship of the post-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle to total cycle length. J. biosoc. Sci. 2 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, J.C. & Marshall, J. (1969) The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle. Popul. Stud. 23, 455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahalan, D. & Cisin, I. (1968) American drinking practices. Summary of findings from a national probability sample: II. Measurement of massed versus spaced drinking. Q. Jl Stud. Alcohol, 29, 642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A.W.F. (1963) Estimation of parameters in short Markov sequences. Jl R. statist. Soc. B, 25, 206.Google Scholar
Healy, M.J.R. (1968) Disciplining of medical data. Br. med. Bull. 24, 210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 22, 719.Google ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, A.E. (1961) Analyzing Quantitative Data, p. 105. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Michael, R.P. (1965) Some aspects of the endocrine control of sexual activity in primates. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58, 595.Google ScholarPubMed
Sen Gupta, A. (1969) Observations on the degree of commitment to family planning in a Calcutta City project. IUSSP Conference,London, Paper G41.Google Scholar
Sollberger, A. (1965) Biological Rhythm Research, p. 99. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wallin, P. & Clark, A. (1958) Cultural norms and husbands' and wives' reports of the marital partner's preferred frequency of coitus relative to their own. Sociometry, 21, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoff, C.F., Bumpass, L. & Ryder, N.B. (1969) Oral contraception, coital frequency, and the time required to conceive. Social Biol. 16, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udry, J. & Morris, N.M. (1968) Distribution of coitus in the menstrual cycle. Nature, Lond. 220, 593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed