Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:48:35.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of contraceptive continuation in rural Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Halida H. Akhter  and
Saifuddin Ahmed
Halida H. Akhter
Affiliation:
Bangladesh Fertility Research Programme, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Saifuddin Ahmed
Affiliation:
Bangladesh Fertility Research Programme, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A contraceptive study of rural Bangladeshi women indicated that the previous death of children, number of living children, desire for additional children and son preference were important determinants of contraceptive continuation. The importance of these factors varies to some extent with use of different contraceptive methods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 261 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhter, H. H. (1987) Predictors of contraceptive continuation among urban family planning acceptors of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Dev. Stud. 15, 101.Google ScholarPubMed
Akhter, H. H. & Ahmed, S. (1991) Contraceptive continuation and failure in rural Bangladesh. In: Measuring the Dynamics of Contraceptive Use, p. 184. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Akhter, H. H., Faisel, A. I., Ahmed, Y. H., Ahmed, S., Khan, N. H., Chowdhury, J. B., Au, S. & Ahmed, A. (1988) An IUD Study to Assess Follow-up Needed for Removal or Reinsertion. Bangladesh Fertility Research Programme, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Bhatia, S. & Kim, Y. J. (1984) Oral contraception in Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plann. 15, 233.Google Scholar
Breslow, N. E. (1974) Co variance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics, 30, 89.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1972) Regression models and life tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. B. 34, 187.Google Scholar
Huq, N. & Cleland, J. (1989) Bangladesh Fertility Survey 1989. National Institute of Population Research and Training, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Islam, M. A., Frankenberg, E. & Islam, S. (1988a) Duration of contraceptive use. In: Bangladesh Contraceptive Prevalence Survey—1985: Secondary Analysis. Edited by Kantner, A. et al. Mitra Associates, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Islam, M. A., Frankenberg, E. & Kantner, A. (1985b) Determinants of acceptance, continuation and termination of family planning methods. In: Bangladesh Contraceptive Prevalence Survey —1985: Secondary Analysis. Edited by Kantner, A. et al. Mitra Associates, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Kamal, G. M., Ahmed, A. & Rahman, S. (1990) IUD Evaluation of 1988 Performance: Final Report. Associates for Community and Population Research, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Laing, J. E. (1985) Continuation and effectiveness of contraceptive practice: a cross-sectional approach. Stud. Fam. Plann. 16, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Population Control (1978) Bangladesh Fertility Survey, First Report 1975. Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. N. (1987) Bangladesh Contraceptive Prevalence Survey—1985: Final Report. Mitra & Associates, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Pakistan Population Planning Council (1974) National Impact Survey Report. Training, Research and Evaluation Centre, Lahore.Google Scholar
Potter, R. G. (1966) An application of life table technique to measurement of contraceptive effectiveness. Demography, 3, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, G. & Hobcraft, J. N. (1980) Illustrative Analysis: Lifetable Analysis of Birth Intervals in Colombia. WFS Scientific Report No. 16. International Statistical Institute, Voorburg.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Lewit, S. (1968) Statistical evaluation of contraceptive methods: use-effectiveness and extended use-effectiveness. Demography, 5, 931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar