Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:55:38.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increasing role of abstinence and infecundity in non-use of contraceptive methods in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Preeti Dhillon Open the ORCID record for Preeti Dhillon [Opens in a new window] ,
Govind Singh ,
Faujdar Ram ,
Pradeep Kumar Open the ORCID record for Pradeep Kumar [Opens in a new window]  and
Niranjan Saggurti
Preeti Dhillon*
Affiliation:
International Institute for Population Sciences, Deonar, Mumbai, India
Govind Singh
Affiliation:
Population Council, New Delhi, India
Faujdar Ram
Affiliation:
Population Council, New Delhi, India
Pradeep Kumar
Affiliation:
International Institute for Population Sciences, Deonar, Mumbai, India
Niranjan Saggurti
Affiliation:
Population Council, New Delhi, India
*
*Corresponding author. Email: pdhillon.iips@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper assesses the reasons for non-use of contraceptive methods, and the possible complexity of reported data on women in India. The study used recent data from two successive rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) (2005–06: N=37,296; 2015–16: N=247,024), which surveyed currently married women aged 15–49 years. The reporting on non-use of contraceptives and the changing pattern of the reasons for non-use were analysed, classified into fertility and other cited reasons. The self-reported reasons for non-use of contraception were verified with other related information captured in the survey. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Sexual abstinence (not having sex: 10%; infrequent sex: 3%) and infecundity (menopausal/hysterectomy: 12%; subfecund/infecund: 10%) were the most commonly reported reasons for non-use of contraceptive methods in 2015–16, followed by refusal to use (10%). The proportion of non-users who wanted to have a child soon (25% to 21%), were pregnant (16% to 13%), in postpartum amenorrhoea (68% to 40%) and who had method-related reasons (10% to 6%) declined over time (from 2005–06 to 2015–16, respectively). A higher proportion of less-educated women reported abstinence (6%) and menopause/hysterectomy (19%) than educated women. Abstinence was more commonly reported in states with low prevalence of modern contraceptive use. The findings suggest that the increasing trend of abstinence and infecundity among non-users of contraception may be a concern for future research and reproductive health programmes, as it questions both the quality of data and sexual health of married couples.

Keywords

ContraceptionReasons for non-useInfecundity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , March 2021 , pp. 167 - 182
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, SE, Croft, TN, Fishel, JD and Westoff, CF (2012) Revising unmet need for family planning. DHS Analytical Studies No. 25. URL: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/AS25/AS25%5B12June2012%5D.pdf (accessed 4th July 2019).Google Scholar
Bradley, SEK, Schwandt, H and Khan, S (2009) Levels, trends, and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation. DHS Analytical Studies No. 20. URL: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/AS20/AS20.pdf (accessed 4th July 2019).Google Scholar
Casterline, JB, Perez, AE and Biddlecom, AE (1997) Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines. Studies in Family Planning 28(3), 173–191.Google ScholarPubMed
Deshingkar, P, Farrington, J (2009) A framework of understanding circular migration. In Deshingkar, P and Farrington, J (eds) Circular Migration and Multilocational Livelihood Strategies in Rural India. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
DIGEST (1985) Nigeria: 95 percent of married women want more children; contraceptive use limited to abstinence. International Family Planning Perspectives 11(3), 98–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIGEST (1989) Only 11 percent of Senegalese women practice birth control: most popular method is abstinence source. International Family Planning Perspectives 15(1), 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, P (2012) Linkages between unintended births and contraceptive discontinuations in India. Open Access Scientific Reports 1, doi:10.4172/scientificreports.554.Google Scholar
El-Zanaty, F, Way, AA, Kishor, S and Casterline, JB (1999) Egypt In-Depth Study on Reasons for Nonuse of Family Planning. National Population Council, Cairo. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Egypt-Indepth-Study-on-the-Reasons-for-Nonuse-of-El-Zanaty-Way/cc7ff8a21e695495f96a4f6dab17f20f31581f97 (accessed 4th July 2019).Google Scholar
Government of India (2014) India’s Vision FP 2020. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), New Delhi. URL: https://advancefamilyplanning.org/sites/default/files/resources/FP2020-Vision-Document%20India.pdf (accessed 21th December 2019).Google Scholar
IIPS and ICF 2017 (2017) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015–16. India. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai. URL: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/ Google Scholar
Jain, AK and Winfrey, W (2017) Contribution of contraceptive discontinuation to unintended births in 36 developing countries. Studies in Family Planning 48(3), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulkarni, R. (2015) Seasonal migration – a developmental challenge? Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machiyama, K, Casterline, JB, Mumah, JN, Huda, FA, Obare, F and Odwe, et al. (2017) Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study. Reproductive Health 14(1), 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marston, C and Cleland, J (2003) Relationships between contraception and abortion: a review of the evidence. International Family Planning Perspectives 29(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, W, Jones, J and Abma, J (2015) Nonuse of contraception among women at risk of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception 92(2), 170–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozumdar, A, Gautam, V, Gautam, A, Dey, A, Saith, R and Achyut, P et al. (2019) Choice of contraceptive methods in public and private facilities in rural India. BMC Health Services Research 19(1), 421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanogo, D, RamaRao, S, Jones, H, N’diaye, P, M’bow, B and Diop, CB (2003) Improving quality of care and use of contraceptives in Senegal. African Journal of Reproductive Health 7(2), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgh, G and Hussain, R (2014) Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Studies in Family Planning 45(3), 414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgh, G, Hussain, R, Bankole, A and Singh, S (2007) Women with an unmet need for contraception in developing countries and their reasons for not using a method. Occasional Report 37, 5–40.Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, Stoeckel, J and Tuladhar, JM (1991) The KAP-gap in Nepal: reasons for non-use of contraception among couples with an unmet need for family planning. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 6(1), 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations (2015) Trends In Contraceptive Use Worldwide 2015. Contraception. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.029 (accessed 25th May, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valekar, SS, Pandve, HT, Chawla, PS and Mane, AB (2017) Assessment of unmet needs of family planning and reasons for non-use of contraceptive methods among women in reproductive age in rural community. Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education 7, 549.Google Scholar