Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:37:51.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sterilisation: characteristics of vasectomy acceptors in Delhi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

N. N. Sarkar
N. N. Sarkar
Affiliation:
Department of Reproductive Biology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The place of vasectomy within the sterilisation programme in Delhi over the period 1983–88 is reviewed and data on vasectomy acceptance and characteristics of acceptors are analysed. Findings suggest a need to improve the strategy for the promotion of vasectomy within the metropolis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 45 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basnayake, S. (1988) An analysis of reasons for rejection at a vasectomy clinic. J. fam. Welfare, 1, 17.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Family Welfare (1989) Brochure of Couple Protection Rate, p. 3. Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Dias, L. R. & Dias, M. K. (1988) The motivating factors for vasectomy in Sri Lanka. J. fam. Welfare, 4, 12.Google Scholar
Kohli, K. L. (1973) Motivational factors and socioeconomic characteristics of the vasectomised male. J. biosoc. Sci. 5, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (1983–84 to 1987–88) Year Book. Family Welfare Programme in India. Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (1988) Health Information, India, p. 266. Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Planning Commission (1985) Health and Family Welfare. In: The Seventh Five-Year Plan (1985–90), Vol. 2, p. 271. Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Rajeswari, N. V. (1989) A comparative study of laparoscopic and conventional tubectomy acceptors in Uttar Kannada district. J. fam. Welfare, 6, 45.Google Scholar
Sarkar, N. N. & Narula, R. K. (1986) Characteristics of women accepting sterilization or intrauterine device following MTP in a metropolitan city like Delhi. Proceedings of International Conference on Sterilization and Family Welfare, pp. 167–175. Delhi.Google Scholar
Sawhney, N et al. . (Eds) (1989) Present Family Welfare Programme Strategy—Some Alternatives, p. 63. Population Centre, Lucknow.Google Scholar