Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:05:23.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surnames in Five English Villages: Relationship to each other, to Surrounding Areas, and to England and Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

G. W. Lasker  and
C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor
G. W. Lasker
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Wayne State University, USA
C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Anthropology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The surnames of all adult residents of five neighbouring communities in the fenlands of Cambridgeshire are compared with each other and with those of the 165,533 persons married in England and Wales in the period January to March 1975. Among the villages the average coefficient of relationship by isonymy (Ri) is 76 × 10−5. The villages nearer together may have a tendency to higher values of Ri: the correlation of Ri with the natural log of distance between villages is −0·49, p = 0·07. The surnames of the five villages give a weighted average Ri with the whole area about 25 miles of 54 × 10−5 and with a zone 25–40 miles away of 45 × 10−5, whereas Ri with all England and Wales is 42 × 10−5. Rare surnames show a much sharper gradient and contribute approximately twice as much to the coefficient in the 25–40 mile zone and six times as much within 25 miles as found with all England and Wales. Moderately frequent surnames and even common surnames show the same gradient, but to a lesser degree. In the part of Cambridgeshire studied, the present distribution of surnames indicates a slight but appreciable local isolation, with the degree of relationship decreasing from among local villages to that between the villages and all England and Wales. This pattern is consistent with the theory of genetic inbreeding based on distance but there is considerable variability in individual instances.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 25 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crow, J.F. (1980) The estimation of inbreeding from isonymy. Hum. Biol. 52, 1.Google ScholarPubMed
Crow, J.F. & Kimura, M. (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Son, New York.Google Scholar
Crow, J.F. & Mange, A.P. (1965) Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same name. Eugen. Q. 12, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guppy, H.B. (1890) Homes of Family Names of Great Britain, Harrison, London.Google Scholar
Hiorns, R.W., Harrison, G.A., Boyce, A.J. & Kuchemann, C.F. (1969). A mathematical analysis of the effects of movement on the relatedness between populations. Ann. hum. Genet. 32, 237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussels, I. (1969) Genetic structure of Saas, a Swiss isolate. Hum. Biol. 42, 469.Google Scholar
Küchemann, C.F., Lasker, G.W. & Smith, D.I. (1979) Historical changes in coefficient of relationship by isonymy among the populations of the Otmoor villages. Hum. Biol. 51, 105.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G.W. (1968) The occurrence of identical (isonymous) surnames in various relationships in pedigrees: a preliminary analysis of the relation of surname combinations to inbreeding. Am. J. hum. Genet. 20; 250.Google ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G.W. (1969) Isonymy (recurrence of the same surname in affinal relations): a comparison of rates calculated from pedigrees, grave markers, and death and birth registers. Hum. Biol. 41, 309.Google Scholar
Lasker, G.W. (1977) Surnames in the study of human biology. Am. Anthrop. 82, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasker, G.W. (1978) Relationships among the Otmoor villages and surrounding communities as inferred from surnames contained in the current register of electors. Ann. hum. biol. 5, 105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasker, G.W., Coleman, D.A., Aldridge, N. & Fox, W.R. (1979) Ancestral relationships within and between districts in the region of Reading, England as estimated by isonymy. Hum. Biol. 51, 445.Google Scholar
Raspe, P. & Lasker, G.W. (1980) The structure of the human population of the Isles of Scilly: inferences from surnames and birth places listed in census and marriage records. Ann. hum. Biol. 7, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.F. & Rawung, C.P. (1974) Secular trends in genetic structure: an isonymic analysis of Northumberland parish records. Ann. hum. Biol 1, 303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souden, D. & Lasker, G.W. (1978) Biological interrelationships between parishes in East Kent: an analysis of Marriage Duty Act returns for 1705. Loc. Pop. Stud. 15, 30.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A.C. (1980) Historical Demography in Current Developments in Anthropological Genetics, Edited by Mielke, J. H. and Crawford, M. H., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar