Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:44:01.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advance by Retreat? The Formation of British Labour's Electoral Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Kenneth D. Wald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Every step towards our goal is dependent on gaining the assent and support of at least a numerical majority of the whole people. Thus, even if we aimed at revolutionizing everything at once, we should necessarily be compelled to make each particular change only at the time, and to the extent, and in the manner which ten or fifteen million electors, in all sorts of conditions, of all sorts of temperaments, from Land's End to the Orkneys, could be brought to consent to it.

Now, anybody can see the difficulties which politicians must encounter when they are trying to get votes from the West End of London and South Wales at the same time.

Whatever else it might be, whatever its other functions or activities in modern democratic societies, a political party is first and foremost an organization that seeks control of government through the electoral process. Unless it first attains the legitimate governing authority that accompanies majority status, a political party cannot implement the policies necessary to realize its vision of the just society, nor can it fulfill the other roles assigned to parties by modern democratic theory. For just such reasons, it is commonly said that votes are to political parties what profits are to corporations; just as corporate behavior would be incomprehensible without reference to the profit motive, so party behavior is often inexplicable without recognizing the centrality of electoral competition. For parties with normative goals in countries with democratic political systems, the drive for electoral supremacy must be a constant concern.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 3: The Dilemmas of Democratic Politics , July 1988 , pp. 283 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sidney Webb's presidential address to the 1923 Labour Party Conference (LPC), cited in Anderson, Perry, “Problems of Socialist Strategy,” in Towards Socialism, ed. Anderson, Perry and Blackburn, Robin (Ithaca, N.Y., 1966), p. 224Google Scholar.

2 Scanlon, John, Cast Off All Fooling (London, 1939), p. 233Google Scholar.

3 Schlesinger, Joseph A., “On the Theory of Party Organization,” Journal of Politics 46 (May 1984): 369–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 For an exception, see Sainsbury, Diane, Swedish Social Democratic Ideology and Electoral Politics, 1944–1948 (Stockholm, 1980)Google Scholar.

5 Beer, Samuel, British Politics in the Collectivist Age, 2d ed. (New York, 1969)Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., p. 149.

7 Harrison, Royden, “The War Emergency Workers' National Committee, 1914–1920,” in Essays in Labour History, 1886–1923, ed. Briggs, Asa and Saville, John (Hamden, Conn., 1971), pp. 211–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Wolfe, Joel, Workers, Participation, and Democracy: Internal Politics in the British Union Movement (Westport, Conn., 1985)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 6.

9 Labour Party Conference Report (LPCR), 1918 (London), p. 99Google Scholar.

10 This article follows the line of thought developed by Adam Przeworski and John Sprague. See Przeworski, Adam, Capitalism and Social Democracy (New York, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Przeworski, Adam and Sprague, John, Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism (Chicago, 1986)Google Scholar.

11 Marx, Karl, “Address to the International Workingmen's Association,” in The Challenge of Socialism, ed. Pelling, Henry, 2d ed. (London, 1968), pp. 103–4Google Scholar.

12 Marx, Karl, “The Chartists,” New York Daily Tribune (August 25, 1852)Google Scholar, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels on Britain, 2d ed. (Moscow, 1962), p. 361Google Scholar; Engels, Frederick, “The Ten Hours Question,” Democratic Review (March 1850), cited in Pelling, , ed., p. 99Google Scholar.

13 Porritt, Edward, The Englishman at Home (London, 1893), p. 148Google Scholar.

14 For examples of inflated estimates from contemporaries, see Labour party, Job's Talks (London, n.d.), p. 2Google Scholar; Should the Working Class Support the Liberal Party? (London, 1905), p. 14Google Scholar; Threlfall, T. R., “The Political Future of ‘Labour,’” Nineteenth Century 35 (February 1894): 210Google Scholar. Contemporary research that casts doubt on these claims can be found in Blewett, Neal, “The Franchise in the United Kingdom, 1885–1910,” Past and Present, no. 32 (1965), pp. 27–56Google Scholar; Matthews, H. C. G., McKibbin, R. I., and Kay, J. A., “The Franchise Factor in the Rise of the Labour Party,” English Historical Review 91 (October 1976): 723–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wald, Kenneth D., “Institutional Obstacles to Partisan Mobilization: Another Look at the ‘Franchise Factor’ in British Party Development,” European Journal of Political Research 12 (March 1984): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clegg, H. A., Fox, Alan, and Thompson, A. F., A History of British Trade Unions since 1889 (Oxford, 1964), pp. 269–71Google Scholar.

15 Blewett, Neal, The Peers, the Parties, and the People: The General Elections of 1910 (Toronto, 1972), pp. 488–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Baker, Frank, “Socialism and Politics: Towards a Practical Policy,” Socialist Review 5 (1910): 295Google Scholar. The phrase about making and unmaking governments can be found in the proceedings of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), 1894 (p. 44), and 1897 (p. 25).

17 Shaw, George Bernard, Report on Fabian Policy, tract no. 70 (London, 1896), p. 5Google Scholar.

18 LPCR, 1900, pp. 16–18Google Scholar.

19 See, e.g., Crooks, Will, “The Prospects and Programme of the Labour Party,” National Review 46 (December 1905): 621–22Google Scholar; Glennie, J. S. Stuart, “Unionist Policy,” Fortnightly Review (December 1, 1895), p. 852Google Scholar.

20 LPCR, 1903, p. 105Google Scholar; LPCR, 1906, p. 41Google Scholar; LPCR, 1910, p. 6Google Scholar; Rose, Frank H., The Coming Force: The Labour Movement (Manchester, 1909), p. 107Google Scholar; LPCR, 1917, p. 82Google Scholar.

21 Fabian Society, A Plan of Campaign for Labour, tract no. 49 (London, 1894), p. 32Google Scholar; Edwards, John, Politics and the Independent Labour Party (London, 1897), p. 6Google Scholar; Pease, E. R., “The Labour Representation Conference,” Economic Review 10 (April 1900): 236Google Scholar; LPCR, 1905, p. 228Google Scholar; MacDonald, J. Ramsay, The Socialist Movement (New York, 1911), p. 233Google Scholar, Socialism (1907), cited by Barker, Bernard, ed., Ramsay MacDonald's Political Writings (London, 1972), p. 162Google Scholar; Hardie, James Keir, My Confession of Faith in the Labour Alliance (London, 1909), p. 1Google Scholar.

22 Letter from Arthur Peters to the LRC (1908), in “Infancy of the Labour Party,” British Library of Political Science, London School of Economics, Misc. Collection 196, vol. 2; Seddon, J. A., J. A. Seddon's Candidature (St. Helen's, 1905)Google Scholar.

23 Labour Leader (September 2, 1904), cited by Hughes, Emrys, ed., in Keir Hardie's Speeches and Writings (Glasgow, 1924), p. 118Google Scholar.

24 The New Charter: A Programme of Working Class Politics (Dover, 1892), p. 1Google Scholar.

25 LPCR, 1900, p. 17Google Scholar.

26 Ibid.

27 McKibbin, Ross, Evolution of the Labour Party, 1910–1924 (London, 1974), p. 95Google Scholar, n. 26.

28 LPCR, 1906, p. 66Google Scholar.

29 Attlee, Clement R., The Labour Party in Perspective—and Twelve Years Later (London, 1949), p. 50Google Scholar.

30 LPCR, 1904, pp. 31, 47Google Scholar; Wald, Kenneth D., Crosses on the Ballot: Patterns of British Voter Alignment since 1885 (Princeton, N.J., 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hardie, James Keir, From Serfdom to Socialism (London, 1907), p. 26Google Scholar; Hobson, J. A., “The General Election: A Sociological Interpretation,” Sociological Review 3 (April 1910): 105–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Letter from H. Sanderson to Arthur Peters (1908), Labour party files, LP/E1/08/01/133.

31 Frederick Engels, Letter to August Bebel (August 30, 1883), in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: Correspondence, 1846–1895 (London, 1934), p. 419Google Scholar; Blatchford, Robert, “The New Party in the North,” in The New Party, ed. Reid, Andrew (London, 1894), p. 16Google Scholar; Strachey, J. St. Loe, “Future of the Labour Party,” Spectator (July 6, 1918), p. 5Google Scholar; Garvin, J. L., “A Party with a Future,” Fortnightly Review (September 1, 1895), pp. 326–27Google Scholar; Hunter, Robert, “The British Labor Party: A Reply,” International Socialist Review 9 (April 1909): 754–56Google Scholar.

32 Report of the First Annual Labour Electoral Congress (Southport, 1888), pp. 8–17Google Scholar.

33 Report of the Eighth Annual Labour Electoral Congress (Southport, 1895), p. 6Google Scholar.

34 Watts, J. Hunter, Reynold's Magazine (August 12, 1894)Google Scholar, cited by A Working Man (Arthur Shepherd), The Independent Labour Party So-Called (Sheffield, 1894), pp. 9–10Google Scholar. W. V. Osborne, whose refusal to pay a political levy to his union precipitated the famous judgment in 1909, dismissed the socialist movement as “aliens, females, and males without votes,” in Sane Trade Unionism (London, 1913), p. 94Google Scholar.

35 Hardie, , My Confession of Faith (n. 21 above), p. 15Google Scholar.

36 LPCR, 1905, p. 226Google Scholar.

37 Bell, Richard, Trade Unionism (London, 1907), pp. 90–91Google Scholar.

38 Trades Unionism and Socialism (London, n.d.), p. 15Google Scholar.

39 Trades Union Congress (London, 1916), p. 387Google Scholar.

40 McKibbin (n. 27 above), p. 106.

41 Fabian Society, Report and Resolutions of the Special Committee Appointed to Consider Socialist Representation in Parliament (London, 1907)Google Scholar. On Webb's role, see MacKenzie, Norman, ed., The Letters of Sidney and Beatrice Webb (Cambridge, 1978), 2:256–57Google Scholar.

42 Fischer, Victor, Justice (1911)Google Scholar, cited by Pierson, Stanley, British Socialists: The Journey from Fantasy to Politics (Cambridge, Mass., 1979), p. 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For similar views, see Orage, A. R., “Politics for Craftsmen,” Contemporary Review 91 (June 1907): 782–94Google Scholar.

43 Hyndman, H. M., “Socialism, Trade Unionism and Political Action,” Quarterly Bulletin of the Marx Memorial Library 40 (October-December 1966): 15–17Google Scholar.

44 A copy of this document is contained in Henderson, Arthur, The Aims of Labour, 2d ed. (New York: Holt, 1918)Google Scholar.

45 Shadwell, Arthur, The Socialist Movement, 1824–1924 (London, 1925), 2:129–30Google Scholar; “The Labour Party and the Nation,” Spectator (October 27, 1917), pp. 439–40Google Scholar; “The Coming of the Labour Party,” New Statesman (January 4, 1919), p. 278Google Scholar.

46 Webb, Sidney, The New Constitution of the Labour Party (London, 1918)Google Scholar; Webb, Sidney and Webb, Beatrice, The Principles of the Labour Party (London, 1918)Google Scholar; Webb, Sidney, An Open Letter to the Men and Women Graduates of the University of London (London, n.d.)Google Scholar.

47 Henderson, Arthur, “Labour's New Comradeship,” Herald (January 19, 1918), p. 5Google Scholar.

48 McKibbin, pp. 97–106.

49 Wald, Kenneth D., “Alternative Visions of Social Structure: Cycles of Revisionism in the British Labour Party,” in Labor in Retreat: The Crisis of Social Democracy in Interwar Europe, ed. Gruber, Helmut and Maderthaner, Wolfgang (Vienna, 1988)Google Scholar.

50 For the best statement of this perspective, consult the essays in Anderson and Blackburn, eds. (n. 1 above).

51 See Anderson, 's essay, “Origins of the Present Crisis,” in Towards Socialism (n. 1 above), p. 34Google Scholar.

52 Anderson, , “Problems of Socialist Strategy,” (n. 1 above), pp. 240–47Google Scholar.

53 The continuity with earlier views can be seen by consulting the comments and essays in Jacques, Martin and Mulhern, Francis, eds., The Forward March of Labour Halted? (London, 1981)Google Scholar.

54 Angell, Norman, Must Britain Travel the Moscow Road? (London, 1926), p. 148Google Scholar; Elton, Godfrey, “The Problem of the Middle Classes,” Socialist Review 9 (1927): 44–49Google Scholar; Morrison, Herbert, “Can Labour Win London without the Middle Classes?” Labour Organiser 35 (October 1923): 16–19Google Scholar. My own estimate for the interwar period, based on secondary analysis of the data compiled by Miller, William (Electoral Dynamics in Britain since 1918 [New York, 1977])CrossRefGoogle Scholar, is that industrial workers were a clear majority in only about one-third of the constituencies.

55 The 40 percent figure includes all persons in occupational categories 3–19 as a percentage of the economically active population. These categories identify persons engaged in manufacturing and extractive industries. The constituency data are provided in Butler, David and Kavanagh, Dennis, The British General Elections of 1974 (London, 1975), pp. 293–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Dunleavy, Patrick and Husbands, Christopher T., British Democracy at the Crossroads (London, 1985)Google Scholar. A recent poll found that since Margaret Thatcher's accession in 1979, the level of home ownership has risen from 52 percent to 66 percent in the electorate, and share ownership has also climbed from 7 percent to 19 percent. Two core labor groups, trade unionists and workers in nationalized industries, have declined, respectively, from 30 percent to 22 percent and from 18 percent to 13 percent of the electorate (Fallon, Ivan, “Gaining the Middle-Class Ground,” Sunday Times [May 3, 1987], p. 60Google Scholar).

57 Hindess, Barry, Parliamentary Democracy and Socialist Politics (London, 1983)Google Scholar.

58 Michels, Robert, “The Origins of Anti-capitalistic Mass Spirit,” in Political Sociology, ed. Eisenstadt, S. N. (New York, 1971), pp. 498–505Google Scholar. The theme has been developed systematically in Bulmer, Martin, ed., Working-Class Images of Society (London, 1975)Google Scholar.

59 Jones, Gareth Stedman, Languages of Class (Cambridge, 1983), p. 256Google Scholar.

60 Labour Coordinating Committee, Labour and Mass Politics (London, 1982)Google Scholar.

61 Wald, “Alternative Visions of Social Structure” (n. 49 above).

62 Przeworski and Sprague (n. 10 above), chap. 3.