Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:52:55.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Homes, Domestic Factories: The Convergence of Public and Private Space in Interwar Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2012

Vicky Long
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 434 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This was the official journal of the Industrial Welfare Society. It was first published in 1918 as the Boy’s Welfare Journal, renamed the Journal of Industrial Welfare in 1920 and subsequently shortened to Industrial Welfare in 1922. The correct title is given in the footnotes, but the journal is referred to as Industrial Welfare throughout the main body of the text for clarity.

2 Ruskin, John, “The Nature of the Gothic,” in On Art and Life (London, 2004), 16, 14, 19Google Scholar. Originally published in The Stones of Venice, vol. 2 (1853).

3 Woodson-Boulton, Amy, “A Window onto Nature: Visual Language, Aesthetic Ideology, and the Art of Social Transformation,” in Visions of an Industrial Age, 1830–1914: Modernity and the Anxiety of Representation in Europe, ed. Kang, Minsoo and Woodson-Boulton, Amy (Aldershot, 2008), 139–61Google Scholar, “Victorian Museums and Victorian Society,” History Compass 6, no. 1 (January 2008): 109–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “‘Industry without Art Is Brutality’: Aesthetic Ideology and Social Practice in Victorian Art,” Journal of British Studies 46, no. 1 (January 2007): 47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 William Morris, “Work in a Factory as It Might Be,” Justice, 17 May 1884, 2.

5 Cumming, Elizabeth and Kaplan, Wendy, The Arts and Crafts Movement (London, 1991), 7, 18Google Scholar; Harvey, Charles and Press, Jon, “John Ruskin and the Ethical Foundations of Morris & Company, 1861–96,” Journal of Business Ethics 14, no. 3 (March 1995): 181–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Phillips, Simon, “Industrial Welfare and Recreation at Boots Pure Drug Company, 1883–1945” (PhD diss., Nottingham Trent University, 2003)Google Scholar.

7 For example, Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1911, Cd. 6293 (1912), 159; see also Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1913, Cd. 7491 (1914), 101.

8 Thomson, Mathew, Psychological Subjects: Identity, Culture, and Health in Twentieth-Century Britain (Oxford, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rose, Nikolas, Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London, 1999)Google Scholar; Gabriel, Joseph M., “Mass-Producing the Individual: Mary C. Jarrett, Elmer E. Southard, and the Industrial Origins of Psychiatric Social Work,” Bulletin for the History of Medicine 79, no. 3 (Fall 2005): 430–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eghigian, Greg, Killen, Andreas, and Leuenberger, Christine, “The Self as Project: Politics and the Human Sciences in the Twentieth Century,” Osiris 22 (September 2007): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 The term “industrial warfare” was first used in The Times in 1876 in a report that asserted that as the trade unions had formed a federation it was time for the employers to do likewise, “for their own protection” (“Employers and Trade Unions,” The Times, 26 February 1876, 5). Use of the phrase peaked in The Times in the 1910s, when it was used in forty-four instances; the term was last used in the paper in 1920 (four mentions).

10 Littmann, William, “Designing Obedience: The Architecture and Landscape of Welfare Capitalism, 1880–1930,” International Labor and Working-Class History 53 (Spring 1998): 88–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 “Romance of Industry,” Journal of Industrial Welfare 3 (April 1921): 16Google Scholar.

12 Braybon, Gail, Women War Workers in the First World War (1981; repr., London, 1989), chap. 4Google Scholar.

13 Kent, Susan Kingsley, Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain (Princeton, NJ, 1993)Google Scholar.

14 Braybon, Women War Workers, 166–70; Thom, Deborah, Nice Girls and Rude Girls: Women Workers in World War I (1998; repr., London, 2000), 142–53Google Scholar; Kingsley Kent, Making Peace, 37–41; Woollacott, Angela, “‘Khaki Fever’ and Its Control: Gender, Age and Sexual Morality on the British Homefront in the First World War,” Journal of Contemporary History 29, no. 2 (April 1994): 325–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Ministry of Munitions, Report of the War Cabinet Committee on Women in Industry, Cmd. 135 (1919), 80.

16 Ministry of Munitions, Health of Munition Workers Committee Interim Report: Industrial Efficiency and Fatigue, Cd. 8511 (1917), 2.

17 Ministry of Munitions, Health of Munition Workers Committee Final Report, Cd. 9065 (1918), 15.

18 Woollacott, Angela, “Maternalism, Professionalism and Industrial Welfare Supervisors in World War One Britain,” Women’s History Review 3, no. 1 (1994): 29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1918, Cmd. 340 (1919), 43.

20 Woollacott, “Maternalism, Professionalism and Industrial Welfare Supervisors,” 38.

21 Jones, Helen, “Women Health Workers: The Case of the First Women Factory Inspectors in Britain,” Social History of Medicine 1, no. 2 (1988): 165–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; and Livesey, Ruth, “The Politics of Work: Feminism, Professionalization and Women Inspectors of Factories and Workshops,” Women’s History Review 13, no. 2 (2004): 233–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Thom, Nice Girls and Rude Girls, 160.

23 Beddoe, Deidre, Back to Home and Duty: Women between the Wars, 1918–1939 (London, 1989)Google Scholar; Light, Alison, Forever England: Femininity, Literature and Conservatism between the Wars (London, 1991)Google Scholar; Kingsley Kent, Making Peace.

24 Bingham, Adrian, “‘An Era of Domesticity’? Histories of Women and Gender in Interwar Britain,” Cultural and Social History 1, no. 2 (May 2004): 225–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Gender, Modernity and the Popular Press in Inter-war Britain (Oxford, 2004), 145–81Google Scholar.

25 Todd, Selina, Young Women, Work and Family in England, 1918–1950 (Oxford, 2005), 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Glucksmann, Miriam, Women Assemble: Women Workers and the New Industries in Inter-war Britain (London, 1990), 46–53, 54–56Google Scholar.

27 Long, Vicky and Marland, Hilary, “From Danger and Motherhood to Health and Beauty: Health Advice for the Factory Girl in Early Twentieth-Century Britain,” Twentieth Century British History 20, no. 4 (2009): 454–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

28 On efforts to counter hazards posed to women’s reproductive health, see Harrison, Barbara, Not Only the “Dangerous Trades”: Women’s Work and Health in Britain, 1880–1914 (Abingdon, 1996)Google Scholar; Malone, Carolyn, Women’s Bodies and Dangerous Trades in England, 1880–1914 (Woodbridge, 2003)Google Scholar.

29 Cowan, Ruth Schwartz, More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave (New York, 1983)Google Scholar; van Otterloo, Anneke, “The Rationalization of Kitchen and Cooking, 1920–1970,” Journal for the Study of Food and Society 4, no. 1 (Spring 2000): 19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nolan, Mary, “‘Housework Made Easy’: The Taylorized Housewife in Weimar Germany’s Rationalized Economy,” Feminist Studies 16, no. 3 (Autumn 1990): 549–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Apple, Rima D., Perfect Motherhood: Science and Childrearing in America (New Brunswick, NJ, 2006)Google Scholar.

31 Cowan, More Work for Mother; Glucksmann, Women Assemble, 226–56.

32 Gutman, Marta, “Inside the Institution: The Art and Craft Settlement Work at the Oakland New Century Club, 1895–1923,” in People, Power and Places: Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, ed. McMurry, Sally and Adams, Annmarie (Knoxville, TN, 2000), 248–79Google Scholar.

33 Van Slyck, Abigail A., “The Lady and the Library Loafer: Gender and Public Space in Victorian America,” Winterthur Portfolio 31, no. 4 (Winter 1996): 221–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Adams, Annmarie, “Rooms of Their Own: The Nurses’ Residences at Montreal’s Royal Victoria Hospital,” Material History Review 40 (Fall 1994): 29–41Google Scholar, quote on 37.

35 Prost, Antoine, “Changing Workers and Workplaces,” in A History of Private Life V: Riddles of Identity in Modern Times, ed. Prost, A. and Vincent, G. (Cambridge, MA, 1991), 9–49Google Scholar, quote on 9.

36 For a critical overview of the literature on separate spheres, see Vickery, Amanda, “Golden Age to Separate Spheres? A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women’s History,” The Historical Journal 36, no. 2 (June 1993): 383–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Neiswander, Judith A., The Cosmopolitan Interior: Liberalism and the British Home, 1870–1914 (New Haven, CT, 2008)Google Scholar.

38 Similarly, Annmarie Adams has argued that nurses’ residences sought to ease women’s pathways into work by evoking a sense of home while restricting nurses’ autonomy; see Adams, “Rooms of Their Own.”

39 For a helpful overview of the literature on the domestic interior and the porous boundaries between public and private space, see Hamlett, Jane, “The British Domestic Interior and Social and Cultural History,” Cultural and Social History 6, no. 1 (March 2009): 97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Adams, Annmarie, Architecture in the Family Way: Doctors, Houses, and Women, 1870–1900 (Montreal, 1996)Google Scholar.

41 Donald, Moira, “Tranquil Havens? Critiquing the Idea of Home as the Middle-Class Sanctuary,” in Domestic Space: Reading the Nineteenth-Century Interior, ed. Bryden, Inga and Floyd, Janet (Manchester, 1999), 103–20Google Scholar, quote on 104.

42 Purvis, June, Hard Lessons: The Lives and Education of Working-Class Women in Nineteenth-Century England (Padstow, 1989)Google Scholar.

43 “Overcrowding in Domestic and Other Workshops,” memorandum produced January 1924, TUC Archive, Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick (hereafter MRC), MS 292/140/1.

44 Buxton, Neil K. and Aldcroft, Derek H., eds., British Industry between the Wars: Instability and Industrial Development, 1919–1939 (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

45 Glucksmann, Women Assemble.

46 Wolkowitz, Carol, Bodies at Work (London, 2006), 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Sangster, Joan, Earning Respect: The Lives of Working Women in Small-Town Ontario, 1920–1960 (Toronto, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glucksmann, Women Assemble. The ideology of separate spheres also found spatial expression in office architecture. See Kwolek-Folland, Angel, Engendering Business: Men and Women in the Corporate Office, 1870–1930 (Baltimore, 1994)Google Scholar.

48 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1929, Cmd. 3633 (1930), 54.

49 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1933, Cmd 4657 (1934), 78.

50 Briggs, Lindy, The Rational Factory: Architecture, Technology and Work in America’s Age of Mass Production (Baltimore and London, 1996)Google Scholar.

51 Jones, Edgar, Industrial Architecture in Britain, 1750–1939 (London, 1985), 76Google Scholar.

52 Ibid.; see also Stratton, Michael and Trinder, Barry, Twentieth-Century Industrial Archaeology (London, 2000), 1–17Google Scholar.

53 Jones, Industrial Architecture; Darley, Gillian, Factory (London, 2003)Google Scholar; and Brockman, H. A. N., The British Architect in Industry (London, 1974)Google Scholar.

54 Skinner, Joan, Form and Fancy: Factories and Factory Buildings by Wallis, Gilbert & Partners, 1916–1939 (Liverpool, 1997), 264Google Scholar. See also Yeomans, David and Cottam, David, Owen Williams (London, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 See McIvor, Arthur, A History of Work in Britain, 1880–1950 (Basingstoke, 2001), 111–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for an overview of occupational health from 1880 to the First World War.

56 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1912, Cd. 6852 (1913), 150.

57 Squire, Rose, Thirty Years in the Public Service: An Industrial Retrospect (London, 1927), 45Google Scholar.

58 Walkowitz, Judith, City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London (1992; repr., London, 1998), 52–61Google Scholar; and Prochaska, F. K., Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England (Oxford, 1980)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 4.

59 Kerr, C. U., “Some Aspects of a Welfare Scheme,” Industrial Welfare 5 (September 1923): 264–66Google Scholar, quote on 264–65.

60 For a discussion of these trends in the nineteenth century, see Adams, Architecture in the Family Way; for the twentieth century, see Tomes, Nancy, The Gospel of Germs: Men, Women and the Microbe in American Life (Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 6.

61 “Welfare in a Congested Area,” Journal of Industrial Welfare 2 (July 1920): 225–28Google Scholar, quote at 227.

62 Photograph, without parent article, captioned “Ambulance room of Mather and Platt, Ltd. The large workshop can be seen through the window,” Industrial Welfare 6 (November 1924): 365Google Scholar.

63 Walker, Lynne, “Home Making: An Architectural Perspective,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 27, no. 3 (2002): 823–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Girouard, Mark, Life in the English Country House: A Social and Architectural History (New Haven, CT, and London, 1978)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 10.

64 Ministry of Munitions, Health of Munition Workers Committee Final Report, “Section IX: Food and Canteens,” 51–61.

65 Ministry of Munitions, Canteen Construction and Equipment, Cd. 8199 (1916).

66 Ministry of Munitions, Health of Munition Workers Committee Final Report, 54, 56.

67 Collis, Edgar L. and Greenwood, Major, The Health of the Industrial Worker (London, 1921), 267Google Scholar. Cited in Vernon, James, Hunger: A Modern History (Cambridge, MA, and London, 2007), 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 E. Slocock, “Chapter 6: Welfare,” in Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1933, 78. By December 1941, 5,695 factory canteens were in operation (Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories for the Year 1943, Cmd. 6563 [1944], 60).

69 Cromley, Elizabeth, “Domestic Space Transformed, 1850–2000,” in Architectures: Modernisms and After, ed. Ballantyne, Andrew (Oxford, 2004), 163–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 176–77; and Neiswander, The Cosmopolitan Interior, 17.

70 R.B.M., “An ‘All-Electric’ Canteen,” Industrial Welfare 5 (May 1923): 124–28, quote on 124.

71 Neiswander, The Cosmopolitan Interior, 17. See also Girouard, Mark, The Victorian Country House (New Haven, CT, and London, 1979), 34–38Google Scholar.

72 Kerr, C. U., “A Liverpool Scheme,” Industrial Welfare 10 (June 1928): 185–87Google Scholar, esp. 187.

73 Girouard, Life in the English Country House, 292–94; Neiswander, The Cosmopolitan Interior, 18.

74 Bourke, Helen, “Pavy, Emily Dorothea (1885–1967),” in Australian Dictionary of Biography, ed. Nolan, Melanie, 16 vols. (Melbourne, 1988), 11:168–69Google Scholar.

75 Proud, Dorothea, Welfare Work: Employers’ Experiments for Improving Working Conditions in Factories, with Foreword by David Lloyd George (London, 1918), 125Google Scholar.

76 “A New Scottish Welfare Building,” Industrial Welfare 8 (October 1926): 335–39Google Scholar.

77 An Industrial Canteen: Catering Arrangements at Bournville (Bournville, 1930)Google Scholar, Library and Information Service, Cadbury Ltd. Bournville, Cadbury Archives, 334/002123.

78 For an overview of bathroom design, see Lupton, Ellen and Miller, J. Abbott, The Bathroom, the Kitchen, and the Aesthetics of Waste: A Process of Elimination (New York, 1992), 25–39Google Scholar.

79 Local Government Boards for England and Wales, and Scotland, Report of the Committee to Consider Questions of Building Construction in Connection with the Provision of Dwellings for the Working Classes in England and Wales, and Scotland, and Report upon Methods of Securing Economy and Dispatch in the Provision of Such Dwellings, Cd. 9191 (1918), 27.

80 Rappaport, Erika Diane, Shopping for Pleasure: Women in the Making of London’s West End (Princeton, NJ, 2000), 74–107Google Scholar.

81 Hosgood, Christopher P., “‘Doing the Shops’ at Christmas: Women, Men and the Department Store in England, c. 1880–1914,” in Cathedrals of Consumption: The European Department Store, 1850–1939, ed. Crossick, Geoffrey and Jaumain, Serge (Aldershot, 1999), 97–115, esp. 99Google Scholar.

82 Queen, 28 June 1899, 138; cited in Rappaport, Shopping for Pleasure, 94.

83 Jenson and Nicholson, Ltd., The Function of Colour in Factories Schools and Hospitals (London, n.d., ca. 1940s), 26–27, 20–21Google Scholar.

84 Proud, Welfare Work, 97–98.

85 Ibid.

86 “Miscellanea—Art in Factories,” Journal of Industrial Welfare 3 (March 1921): 113Google Scholar.

87 Aynsley, Jeremy and Grant, Charlotte, “Introduction,” in Imagined Interiors: Representing the Domestic Interior since the Renaissance, ed. Aynsley, Jeremy and Grant, Charlotte (London, 2006), 10–19Google Scholar, quote on 14.

88 Thom, Nice Girls and Rude Girls, chap. 8; Woollacott, “Maternalism, Professionalism and Industrial Welfare Supervisors.”

89 Simon Phillips, for example, analyzed how Boots fostered a familial culture through industrial welfare (Phillips, “Industrial Welfare”).

90 Kerr, C. U., “A New Model Factory,” Industrial Welfare 8 (May 1926): 160–64Google Scholar, quote on 160.

91 Nye, David, American Technological Sublime (Cambridge, MA, 1994)Google Scholar.

92 Williams, Raymond, The Country and the City (London, 1973), 2Google Scholar.

93 Chance, Helena, “The Angel in the Garden Suburb: Arcadian Allegory in the ‘Girls’ Grounds’ at the Cadbury Factory, Bournville, England, 1880–1930,” Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes 27, no. 3 (2007): 197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Cadbury, “The Factory in a Garden,” undated pamphlet ca. 1910, Cadbury Family Archives, Birmingham Central Library, MS 466/19.

95 “A Visit to Bournville Works,” undated brochure ca. 1910s/1920s (a lecture intended to be shown with slides), Cadbury Family Archives, Birmingham Central Library, MS 466/20, pp. 9–10.

96 Ward, Stephen V., ed., The Garden City: Past, Present and Future (London, 1992)Google Scholar.

97 Kerr, “A New Model Factory,” 160.

98 Ministry of Munitions, Health of Munition Workers Committee Final Report, 51–61, and Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories for the Year 1943, 60.

99 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories for the Year 1943, 57; Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1918, 43.

100 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1919, Cmd. 941 (1920), 124. Until 1938, the inspectorate listed separately the number of factories (distinguished by a supply of electricity) and the number of workshops. The 1919 figure includes 135,454 factories and 145,737 workshops.

101 Lee, John, The Principles of Industrial Welfare (London, 1924), 2Google Scholar. Lee was the controller of the Central Telegraph Office and the first editor of the Journal of Public Administration.

102 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1919, 87; Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1925, Cmd. 2714 (1926), 96–98.

103 “Industrial Medical Service (Factories),” statement of government policy sent by the Ministry of Labour and National Service to Vincent Tewson, 30 August 1948, TUC Archive, MRC, MS 292/142/1.

104 These cases were detailed in Industrial Welfare in the 1920s; for example, H.S., “When Does Employment Cease?” 7 (March 1925): 281, and “Accident on the Way to Work—When Does Employment Commence?” 8 (August 1926): 273.

105 Kerr, C. U., “Welfare in a Lancashire Food Factory,” Industrial Welfare 7 (April 1925): 130–34Google Scholar.

106 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1918, 53.

107 Crawford, Margaret, Building the Workingman’s Paradise: The Design of American Company Towns (London, 1995)Google Scholar.

108 “Industrial Housing: Typical Smaller Schemes,” Journal of Industrial Welfare 5 (June 1921): 157–60Google Scholar.

109 “Life in Vickerstone—an Island Recreation Ground: How Barrow Workers Are Housed,” The Times, 6 August 1918, 9.

110 Summers, Anne, “A Home from Home: Women’s Philanthropic Work in the Nineteenth Century,” in Fit Work for Women, ed. Burman, Sandra (London, 1979), 33–63Google Scholar.

111 , S.W., “The Problem of Home and Factory,” Industrial Welfare 4 (January 1922): 25–26Google Scholar.

112 McArthur, G. F., “Letter to the Editor,” Industrial Welfare 4 (February 1922): 71Google Scholar.

113 “Extra-Mural Welfare Issues,” Industrial Welfare 5 (March 1923): 72–73Google Scholar, quote on 73.

114 MacBride, L., “Letter to the Editor,” Industrial Welfare 4 (March 1922): 117Google Scholar.

115 Glucksmann, Women Assemble; Cowan, More Work for Mother.

116 Advertisement, Crosse & Blackwell, The Times, 8 June 1914, 4.

117 Ibid.

118 Adams, Annmarie, Medicine by Design: The Architect and the Modern Hospital, 1893–1943 (Minneapolis, 2008), 109Google Scholar.

119 For example, advertisements placed by Chivers & Sons in The Times on 24 March 1925, 24, and on 9 September 1925, 15; advertisements placed by J. Lyons & Co on 8 January 1925, 16; on 5 February 1925, 17, and on 7 May 1925, 19; advertisement placed by Ovaltine in The Times on 16 February 1933, 8.

120 Advertisement, Ovaltine, The Times, 11 January 1926, 16.

121 Proud, Welfare Work, 108–9.

122 Bartlett, Peter, “The Asylum and the Poor Law: The Productive Alliance,” in Insanity, Institutions and Society, 1800–1914, ed. Melling, Joseph and Forsythe, Bill (London, 1999), 48–67Google Scholar; Yanni, Carla, The Architecture of Madness: Insane Asylums in the United States (Minneapolis, 2007)Google Scholar.

123 Nye, American Technological Sublime, 127–31. These developments were more marked in America: twenty five people were employed full time to take visitors round the Ford Highland Park Plant.

124 “Guide Handbook for the Beeston Factory,” undated, ca. 1950s, Beeston, Boots Company Archive.

125 Advertisement, British Commercial Gas Association, The Times, 18 October 1929, 9.

126 Advertisement, British Electrical Development Association, The Times, 29 November 1938, 8; italics in original text.

127 Advertisement, Gas Light & Coke Company, The Times, 9 November 1927, 6; italics in original text.

128 On new materials and factory construction, see Stratton and Trinder, Industrial Archaeology, 7–14.

129 “Utopian Factory Opened—Machinery Makes for Leisure—Industrial Crystal Palace,” Aberdeen Evening Express, 28 July 1933. Press cuttings, Beeston, Boots Company Archive.

130 For a description of the Boots factory design, see Darley, Factory, 122–28.

131 Guillen, Mauro F., The Taylorized Beauty of the Mechanical: Scientific Management and the Rise of Modernist Architecture (Princeton, NJ, 2006), 33–44Google Scholar.

132 Sturdy, Steve and Cooter, Roger, “Science, Scientific Management, and the Transformation of Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1950,” History of Science 36, no. 3 (December 1998): 1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

133 Melling, Joseph, Rent Strikes: Peoples’ Struggle for Housing in West Scotland, 1890–1916 (Edinburgh, 1983)Google Scholar; Englander, David, Landlord and Tenant in Urban Britain, 1838–1918 (Oxford, 1983), 193–233Google Scholar.

134 Swenarton, Mark, Homes Fit for Heroes: The Politics and Architecture of Early State Housing in Britain (London, 1981), 67–87Google Scholar.

135 Miller, Helen, “Housing and Town Planning, 1900–1939,” in A Companion to Early Twentieth-Century Britain, ed. Wrigley, Chris (Oxford, 2003), 388–404, esp. 399Google Scholar.

136 Discussed in Beddoe, Back to Home and Duty, 89–95.

137 Special Committee of the National Housing and Town Planning Council, A Policy for the Slums (1929), quoted in Burnett, John, A Social History of Housing, 1815–1970 (1978; repr., London, 1983), 237Google Scholar.

138 See Bayliss, Darrin, “Building Better Communities: Social Life on London’s Cottage Council Estates, 1919–1939,” Journal of Historical Geography 29, no. 3 (July 2003): 376–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 British Association of Residential Settlements, “Introduction” to Annual Report: 1934–1935 (London, 1935)Google Scholar, cited in Bayliss, “Building Better Communities,” 384.

140 Cadbury Brothers, Experimental Houses, Hay Green Lane, Bournville (Bournville, 1920), Cadbury Family Archives, MRC, MS 466/20, p. 4Google Scholar.

141 Le Corbusier, , Towards a New Architecture (1923; repr., Mineola, NY, 1989), 114Google Scholar. William Whyte identifies 1927—the year in which Corbusier’s book was first translated into English—as the year in which modern architectural movement began to emerge within England. See Whyte, William, “The Englishness of English Architecture: Modernism and the Making of a National International Style, 1927–1957,” Journal of British Studies 48, no. 2 (April 2009): 441–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Alan Powers, “The Modern Movement: 1920–1950,” in The Elements of Style: An Encyclopedia of Domestic Architectural Detail, ed. Calloway, Stephen (London, 1996), 448–69Google Scholar.

142 Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, 6–7.

143 Swenarton, Mark, “Houses of Paper and Cardboard: Neville Chamberlain and the Establishment of the Building Research Station at Garston in 1925,” Planning Perspectives 22, no. 3 (July 2007): 257–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The clauses in the 1924 Act passed by the Labour Party, which penalized local authorities for refusing to use modern methods had been tabled as amendments by Chamberlain.

144 Ministry of Health, Committee on New Methods of House Construction: Interim Report (London, 1924)Google Scholar; Second Interim Report of Committee on New Methods of House Construction, Cmd. 2310 (1925); Third Interim Report of Committee on New Methods of House Construction, Cmd. 2334 (London, 1925)Google Scholar.

145 Third Interim Report, 7.

146 White, R. B., Prefabrication: A History of Its Development (London, 1965), 60Google Scholar. Discussed in Herbert, G., The Dream of the Factory-Made House: Walter Gropius and Konrad Wachsmann (Cambridge, MA, and London, 1984), 20–21Google Scholar. See also Finnimore, Brian, Houses from the Factory: System Building and the Welfare State, 1942–74 (London, 1989), 26–47Google Scholar.

147 Ministry of Health, Design of Dwellings: Report of the Design of Dwellings Sub-committee Appointed by the Ministry of Health and Report of a Study Group of the Ministry of Town and Country Planning on Site Planning and Layout in Relation to Housing (London, 1944), 10Google Scholar.

148 Ibid., 27.

149 Lane, F. W., “The Economic Aspects of Industrial Psychology,” in Industrial Psychology, ed. Myers, C. S. (1929; rev. ed., London, 1944), 219–30Google Scholar, quote on 226.

150 Freeman, June, The Making of the Modern Kitchen: A Cultural History (Oxford, 2004), 30Google Scholar.

151 Ryan, Deborah S., The Ideal Home through the Twentieth Century (London, 1997), 38Google Scholar.

152 For example, Farmer, E., Industrial Fatigue Research Board Report No. 14: Time and Motion Study (London, 1923)Google Scholar.

153 Wyatt, S., Industrial Fatigue Research Board Report No. 8: Some Observations on Bobbin Winding (London, 1920), 21Google Scholar.

154 See Light, Forever England.

155 Beddoe, Back to Home and Duty, 89.

156 Giles, Judy, “A Home of One’s Own—Women and Domesticity in England, 1918–1950,” Women’s Studies International Forum 16, no. 3 (May–June 1993): 239–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quote on 245.

157 Joanna Bourke, “Housewifery in Working-Class England 1860–1914,” Past and Present, no. 143 (May 1994): 167–97; Giles, “A Home of One’s Own.”

158 Ryan, The Ideal Home, 34. The 1884 International Health Exhibition set a precedent for later exhibitions, although the displays on housing emphasized health and hygiene rather than utility and convenience. Adams, Architecture in the Family Way, esp. chap. 1.

159 Jeremy Aynsley, “Displaying Designs for the Domestic Interior in Europe and America, 1850–1950,” in Imagined Interiors, 190–215, esp. 205–7.

160 Provision of Dwellings for the Working Classes in England and Wales, and Scotland, 25.

161 Lupton and Miller, The Bathroom, the Kitchen, 41–64, quote on 41.

162 Ravetz, Alison with Turkington, Richard, The Place of Home: English Domestic Environments, 1914–2000 (London, 1995), 157–58Google Scholar.

163 This group came into being in 1931, when a committee of women formed to prepare a paper for the Fifth International Management Congress on aspects of scientific management in the home. The Council operated throughout the 1930s and was revived after the Second World War. Its records are held in the archives of the Women’s Forum at the Women’s Library, London. On Haslett, see Law, Cheryl, Women: A Modern Political Dictionary (London, 2000), 78–79Google Scholar; and Vernon, Hunger, 220.

164 Hinton, James, The First Shop Stewards’ Movement (London, 1973)Google Scholar.

165 Taylor, Robert, The TUC: From the General Strike to New Unionism (Houndmills, 2000), esp. chap. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

166 Discussed in more detail in Long, Vicky, The Rise and Fall of the Healthy Factory: The Politics of Industrial Health in Britain, 1914–60 (Houndmills, 2010), chaps. 2 and 3Google Scholar.

167 C. U. Kerr, “Welfare Work in a Lancashire Asbestos Factory,” Industrial Welfare, April 1928, 109–14. On Turner Brothers, see Tweedale, Geoffrey, Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner & Newall and the Asbestos Hazard (Oxford, 2000), 11–22Google Scholar.

168 See, e.g., Lewis, Brian, “So Clean”: Lord Leverhulme, Soap and Civilization (Manchester, 2008), esp. chap. 4Google Scholar; and Robertson, Emma, Chocolate, Women and Empire: A Social and Cultural History (Manchester, 2009), 9, 120–22Google Scholar.

169 Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1930, Cmd. 3297 (1931), 11. This point has also been made by Helen Jones: see “Employers’ Welfare Schemes and Industrial Relations in Inter-War Britain,” Business History 25, no. 1 (March 1983): 61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

170 Thomas Legge, “Factories Bill,” typescript dated 1 February 1927, TUC Archive, TUC Research Department, MS 292C/140/1.