Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:19:52.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mob and the Revolution of 1688

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2014

William L. Sachse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the major political upheavals which have been called revolutions, the English Revolution of 1688 is generally recognized as extraordinary. Long accepted among moderate Englishmen as “glorious,” a revolution to end revolutions, in more radical quarters it has not been regarded as constituting a true revolution. Contemporary Russian opinion, for example, refuses to bestow upon it this accolade, regarding it as a mere coup d'état. Its conservatism, its legalism, its bloodlessness, the absence of zeal to be found among its protagonists: all contribute to this point of view. That these are characteristics of the Glorious Revolution cannot be denied. More precisely, they characterize the actions of the leaders of the Revolution — of the councillors and legislators and soldiers whose names are known. Of popular opinion and aspiration much less is known, and it is probable that little can be discovered in the surviving evidence. But they can be assessed, to some degree, by following the actions of the mob — or, more accurately, the mobs — as they erupted in London and other parts of the Kingdom.

Mob disturbances, like the plague, were more or less endemic in Stuart England. Roger North, in his Examen, asserts that “the Rabble first changed their Title, and were called the mob” in the gatherings of the Green Ribbon Club. Regardless of when the term was first used, seventeenth-century Englishmen were well acquainted with various manifestations of mob activity. England's growing urban population augmented the mob, and before Shaftesbury, Pym had demonstrated that he was aware of the existence of this popular force and of the uses to which it could be put.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , November 1964 , pp. 23 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Semenov, Viktor F., “Perevorot 1688 g. [The Coup of 1688],” in Kosminskii, Evgenii A. and Levitskii, Ia. A. (eds.), Angliiskaia Burzhuaznaia Revoliutsiia XVII veka [The English Bourgeois Revolution of the 17th Century] (Moscow, 1954), II, 160–61Google Scholar.

2. North, Roger, Examen: or an Enquiry into the Credit and Veracity of a Pretended Complete History. (London, 1740)Google Scholar. The New English Dictionary gives 1688 as the first instance of the use of the word “mob.” “Mobile,” shortened from mobile vulgus, was used as early as 1676.

3. Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1684-85, pp. 307, 308.

4. Ibid., 1685, p. 181.

5. PRO, PC 2/71, Nov. 6, 1685.

6. PRO, SP 31/3, f. 64.

7. Macaulay, Thomas B., History of England from the Accession of James II (New York, 1850), II, 78Google Scholar; cf. Sharpe, Reginald R., London and the Kingdom (London, 1894), II, 518Google Scholar.

8. PRO, SP 31/4, June 1, 1688.

9. Ibid., June [?], 1688.

10. BM, Add. MSS, 34511, ff. 134v-35.

11. Ibid., f. 137v.

12. At least as early as Sep. 29; Turner, F. C., James II (London, 1948), p. 427Google Scholar.

13. BM, Add. MSS, 34512, ff. 105, 112. On Oct. 13, a newsletter writer did not “perceive the people here [London] to bee under any great consternation, not-withstanding the impendent menace of an invasion.” H.M.C. Reports, Pine Coffin MSS, p. 379.

14. BM, Add. MSS, 34510, f. 165.

15. Ibid., ff. 169-69v.

16. Ibid., S. 177v, 178v. Bramston noted that a strong guard was set up “in Holborne, the Strand, about Somerset House, in Covent Garden, at the Mews, and in Seuerall parts within the citie.” SirBramston, John, Autobiography of Sir John Bramston [Camden Society] (London, 1845), p. 332Google Scholar.

17. BM, Add. MSS, 34510, f. 171v.

18. Evelyn, John, Diary of John Evelyn, ed. de Beer, E. S. (Oxford, 1955), IV, 599Google Scholar.

19. BM, Add. MSS, 38175, f. 140v.

20. Like his brother, Charles Petre left England before the end of the year.

21. Evelyn, , Diary of John Evelyn, IV, 602Google Scholar and note; BM, Add. MSS, 34510, f. 161.

22. BM, Add. MSS, 36707, f. 47.

23. Evelyn, , Diary of John Evelyn, IV, 607Google Scholar and note. From BM, Add. MSS, 34510 ff. 173-73v, it appears that it may have been a Benedictine establishment. It occupied the former residence of George, ninth Lord Berkeley.

24. BM, Add. MSS, 34487, f. 35, and see Luttrell, Narcissus, Brief Historical Relation of State Affairs (Oxford, 1857), I, 474Google Scholar. Bramston, (Autobiography of Sir John Bramston, p. 332)Google Scholar attributed the provocation to “boys” — doubtless apprentices.

25. PRO, SP 31/4, Oct. 15, 1688; BM, Add. MSS, 34510, f. 158.

26. Beloff, Max, Public Order and Popular Disturbances, 1660-1714 (Oxford, 1938), p. 41Google Scholar; Macaulay, , History of England, II, 390Google Scholar; Life and Times of Anthony Wood (Oxford, 1894), III, 286Google Scholar. Wood says that on Dec. 4 “the rabble and boyes,” possibly numbering two hundred, “went to every popish house and broke there windows,” starting with the Mitre Inn.

27. Luttrell, , Brief Historical Relation, I, 475, 477.Google Scholar

28. English Currant, Dec. 12-14; Universal Intelligence, Dec. 11-15; London Mercury, Dec. 15-18. All issues of newsbooks cited here and below are from 1688, unless otherwise indicated. See also Macaulay, , History of England, II, 425–26Google Scholar.

29. BM, Egerton MSS, 2717, f. 418v.

30. Universal Intelligence, Dec. 11-15.

31. English Currant, Dec. 12-14; BM, Add. MSS, 34510, ff. 198-99; Macaulay, , History of England, II, 426–27Google Scholar.

32. Boyer, Abel, History of King William III (London, 1702–1703), I, 27Google Scholar.

33. London Mercury, Dec. 15-18. Macaulay, (History of England, II, 426)Google Scholar says “the mansions occupied by the ministers of the Elector Palatine and of the Grand Duke of Tuscany were destroyed,” but there is evidence that the latter establishment was only plundered. See BM, Add. MSS, 34510, ff. 198-99.

34. London Courant, Dec. 12-15.

35. London Mercury, Dec. 15-18.

36. PRO, SP 44/97, Nov. 13, 1688.

37. English Currant, Dec. 12-14.

38. Ibid. It is possible, of course, that Burdet was unpopular for reasons apart from his religion.

39. London Courant, Dec. 12-15.

40. BM, Egerton MSS, 2717 f. 416.

41. For these items see London Mercury, Dec. 22-24; Universal Intelligence, Dec. 15-18 and Dec. 22-26.

42. Particular local grudges and agrarian grievances must have determined mob reactions in some cases. The latter appear to have played some part in depredations upon the estates of the Duke of Ormonde and the Duke of Beaufort, where, in addition to felling trees and killing deer, rural folk demolished or damaged gates, inclosures, and farm buildings. See also BM, Add. MSS, 28876, f. 176.

43. The choir of Chester Cathedral.

44. Orange Gazette, Dec. 31-Jan. 3, 1689.

45. Universal Intelligence, Dec. 22-26.

46. Orange Gazette, Dec. 31-Jan. 3, 1689. This may have been James Peake, Vicar of Bowden, Cheshire, later deprived as a non-juror.

47. See Macaulay, , History of England, II, 428.Google Scholar

48. H.M.C. Dartmouth MSS, p. 232.

49. Ibid., p. 233; Universal Intelligence, Dec. 11-15.

50. London Courant, Dec. 15-18. Moore had been Lord Mayor in 1681-82.

51. Ibid., Dec. 12-15. According to this account, others reported that as the mob descended upon the house “they were harangued by a Person from the House, and told, That the Lord Powis, tho a Papist, was so far a Friend to the Protestants, as to do them any good Office in his power, and was ever averse to any violent proceedings against them, whereupon they departed.” Luttrell says that the residence of Sir Richard Allibone would have been attacked, had not the trained bands intervened. Brief Historical Relation, I, 486Google Scholar. Allibone was dead, but the crowd remembered and resented the part he played in the trial of the seven bishops, as a Justice of the King's Bench.

52. BM, Add. MSS, 36707, f. 50.

53. London Mercury, Dec. 15-18.

54. BM, Add. MSS, 32095, f. 303; H.M.C. Dartmouth MSS, p. 229.

55. Turner, , James II, p. 446Google Scholar.

56. PRO, SP 8/2, Pt. 2, f. 87. Foxcroft, H. C., in her Character of a Trimmer (Cambridge, 1946), p. 265Google Scholar, notes that the crowd was truculent, and that a spokesman declared it would not allow the King to go to France to obtain foreign troops wherewith to overpower the country.

57. Despite fears of a disturbance upon James's return to London, he was greeted with considerable enthusiasm. See London Courant, Dec. 15-18.

58. PRO, SP 44/97, Nov. 8, 1688.

59. Universal Intelligence, Dec. 11-15; English Currant, Dec. 28-Jan. 2, 1689. The former newsbook notes that the castle was seized by inhabitants of Dover who feared that Irish forces were about to take possession of it, “all of them Declaring it for the service of the Prince of Orange and Protestant Religion.” There were also fears of a French landing.

60. London Mercury, Dec. 31-Jan. 3, 1689. Captain Goodmell, assuming command of a force to oppose the Bury St. Edmunds mob, declared that “the warm Transport of a Zealous Rabble, have carried them so far, as not to distinguish between Papists and Protestants.“

61. London Mercury, Dec. 18-22.

62. History of the Late Revolution in England (London, 1689), pp. 164–65Google Scholar; English Currant, Dec. 12-14.

63. London Courant, Dec. 18-22.

64. Referring to the sack of Wild House, Bramston notes that “some of the offenders were common theeues, and those set the boys to work first.” Autobiography of Sir. John Bramston, p. 340.

65. See Dictionary of National Biography, under Hugh Speke. The declaration was supposedly from the Prince of Orange, and called upon Protestants to apprehend and imprison Roman Catholics. See also Macaulay, , History of England, II, 405–06Google Scholar.

66. Calendar of Treasury Books, 1685-89, VIII, Pt. 2, p. 1129Google Scholar.

67. Hyde, Henry and Hyde, Laurence, Correspondence of Henry Hyde, Earl of Clarendon, and of His Brother, Laurence Hyde, Earl of Rochester, with the Diary of Lord Clarendon, ed. Singer, Samuel W. (London, 1828), II, 258Google Scholar. Clarendon says that the rabble came in great numbers to Westminster, “conducted or invited thither by Lord Lovelace or William Killigrew.”

68. A Dialogue between Dick and Tom Concerning the Present Posture of Affairs (London, 1689)Google Scholar.

69. London Mercury, Jan. 3-7, 1689; London Courant, Dec. 22-25, 1688 and Jan. 1-5, 1689.

70. English Currant, Dec. 14-19.

71. Universal Intelligence, Dec. 15-18; London Gazette, Dec. 10-13, 17-20, and 20-24.

72. London Courant, Dec. 12-15.

73. Steele, Robert R. (ed.), Tudor and Stuart Proclamations (Oxford, 1910), IGoogle Scholar, No. 3921.

74. Foxcroft, H. C., Life and Letters of Sir George Savile (London, 1898), II, 35Google Scholar.

75. PRO, SP 8/2, Pt. 2, f. 83.

76. Foxcroft, , Life and Letters of Sir George Savile, II, 58.Google Scholar

77. H.M.C. Dartmouth MSS, p. 233.

78. English Currant, Dec. 12-14.

79. Sharpe, , London and the Kingdom, II, 534–35Google Scholar. Similar searches occurred in the country. See SirReresby, John, Memoirs of Sir John Reresby, ed. Browning, Andrew (Glasgow, 1936), p. 531Google Scholar.

80. Lutttrell, , Brief Historical Relation, I, 488Google Scholar; Universal Intelligence, Dec. 15-18.

81. English Currant, Dec. 28-Jan. 2, 1689.

82. PRO, SP 44/97, Nov. 22, 1688.

83. London Mercury, Dec. 24-27.

84. English Currant, Dec. 12-14.

85. London Mercury, Dec. 22-24.

86. Beloff, , Public Order and Popular Disturbances, p. 43Google Scholar; and see Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, 1689–1690, p. 4Google Scholar.

87. Kirk, Robert, “London in 1689-90,” Pt. 1, ed. Maclean, Donald and Brett-James, Norman G., Transactions of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society, new series, VI (1930), Pt. 2, p. 324Google Scholar.

88. H.M.C. Portland MSS, III, 420Google Scholar.