Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T16:36:38.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of Cantonese classifiers by preschool children in Hong Kong*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2007

SHEK KAM TSE ,
HUI LI  and
SHING ON LEUNG
SHEK KAM TSE
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
HUI LI*
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
SHING ON LEUNG
Affiliation:
The University of Macau
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Hui Li, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. e-mail: huili@hkucc.hku.hk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Cantonese language has a complex classifier system and young learners need to pay attention to both the semantics and syntax of classifiers. This study investigated the repertoire of classifiers produced by 492 Cantonese-speaking preschoolers in three age groups (3;0, 4;0 and 5;0). Spontaneous utterances produced in 30-minute toy-play contexts were collected and transcribed. Analyses identified a productive repertoire of 73 classifiers in the utterances, which could be appropriately classified into the typology proposed in the present study. An age-related increase in the number of classifier types per child as well as the repertoire size of each group was found. 個 go3 (CL) was widely used as the general classifier by the young children. It was also discovered that the three-year-olds were already showing signs of grasping the basic syntax of classifiers. Cognitive, linguistic and contextual influences presumed to shape the evidence are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 495 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language 53, 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. L. (1991). Later than sooner: Extralinguistic categories in the acquisition of Thai classifiers. Journal of Child Language 18, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, M. S. (1986). Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers: historically and in young children. In Craig, C. G. (ed.) Typological studies in language: Noun classes and categorization, Vol. 7, 399–436. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, M. S. (1992). The acquisition of Mandarin. In Slobin, D. (ed.) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 373–455. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, M. S. (2002). Classifiers are for specification: Complementary functions for sortal and general classifiers in Cantonese and Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 31, (1), 33–69.Google Scholar
Fang, F. X. (1985). An experiment on the use of classifiers by 4 to 6 year olds. Acta Psychological Sinica 17, 384–92.Google Scholar
Gandour, J., Petty, S. H., Dardarananda, R., Dechongkit, S. & Mukngoen, S. (1984). The Acquisition of numeral classifiers in Thai. Linguistics 22, 455–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, J. H. (1987). A study of the various stages of development and acquisition of Mandarin Chinese by children in Chinese milieu. National Science Council Research Report. Taiwan: Fu Jen Catholic University.Google Scholar
Hu, Q. (1993 a). The acquisition of Chinese classifiers by young Mandarin-speaking children. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Hu, Q. (1993 b). Overextension of animacy in Chinese classifier acquisition. In Clark, E. V. (ed.) Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual child language research forum, 127–36. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Killingley, S. Y. (1983). Cantonese classifiers: Syntax and semantics. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Grevatt & Grevatt.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H. T. (1996). Theoretical issues in language development and Chinese child language. In Huang, C. T. J. and Li, Y. H. A. (eds) New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 293–356. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). A reference grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loke, K. K. (1991). A semantic analysis of young children's use of Mandarin shape classifiers. In Kwan-Terry, A. (ed.) Child language development in Singapore and Malaysia, 98–116. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Loke, K. K. & Harrison, G. (1986). Young children's use of Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin) sortal classifiers. In Gao, H. S. R. and Hoosain, R. (eds) Linguistics, psychology and the Chinese language, 125–46. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mak, D. L. W. (1991). The acquisition of classifiers in Cantonese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1987). Order of acquisition in the lexicon: Implications from Japanese numerical classifiers. In Nelson, K. E. & van Kleek, A. (eds) Children's language, Vol. 6, 229–60. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. & Yip, V. (1994). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ng, B. C. (1991). Word meaning acquisition and numeral classifiers. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 73–83.Google Scholar
Poon, E. (1980). Some aspects of the ontological development of nominal classifiers in Cantonese. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Sanches, M. (1977). Language acquisition and language change: Japanese numeral classifiers. In Blount, B. G., Sanches, M. & Gumperz, J. J. (eds) Sociocultural dimensions of language change, 51–62. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. & So, L. K. H. (1997). Classifier use of language disordered and age-matched Cantonese speaking children. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 2, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szeto, K. K. S. (1996). Classifiers in Cantonese-speaking children from 1 year 5 months to 3 year 8 months. In Lee, T., Wong, C., Leung, S., Man, P., Cheung, A. & Szeto, K. (eds) The development of grammatical competence in Cantonese-speaking children, 175–202. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Szeto, K. K. S. (1998). The acquisition of Cantonese classifiers. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Tse, J. K. P., Tang, T. C., Shie, Y. H. & Li, C. Y. (1991). Chinese children's language acquisition and development. National Science Council Research Report. Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
Uchida, N. & Imai, M. (1999). Heuristics in learning classifiers: The acquisition of the classifier system and its implications for the nature of lexical acquisition. Japanese Psychological Research 41(1), 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, L. & Lee, S. (2001). L1 development in an L2 environment: The use of Cantonese classifiers and quantifiers by young British-born Chinese in Tyneside. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 4(6), 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C. S. P. (1998). Classifying classifiers in Hong Kong Cantonese. Paper presented at the 7th Annual East-West Centre Participants' Conference, Honolulu, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Wong, C. S. P. (2000). How Cantonese-speaking two-year-olds fend for themselves through the ticket of classifier. In Clark, E. V. (ed.) Proceedings of the thirtieth annual child language research forum, 149–58. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (2005). The acquisition of numeral classifiers: The case of Japanese children. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, V. & Matthews, S. (2000). Basic Cantonese: A grammar and workbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar