Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:51:13.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concurrent and predictive validity of the Galician CDI*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

MIGUEL PÉREZ-PEREIRA  and
MARIELA RESCHES
MIGUEL PÉREZ-PEREIRA*
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
MARIELA RESCHES
Affiliation:
University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Miguel Pérez-Pereira, Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. e-mail: miguel.perez.pereira@usc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the concurrent and predictive validity of the long and short forms of the Galician version of the MacArthur-Bates CDI (IDHC). Forty-two Galician-speaking children were longitudinally evaluated at age 1 ; 6, 2 ; 0 and 4 ; 0. On the first two occasions, the subjects' vocabulary and grammar skills were assessed through the IDHC. Simultaneously, lexical and grammatical measures were obtained from spontaneous speech samples. Standardized measures of general cognitive abilities (WPPSI-R) and receptive and expressive language (RDLS-III) were obtained at age 4 ; 0. Results showed high and significant levels of concurrent and short-term validity of the IDHC. Strong associations were found between lexical development at age 2 ; 0 and language scores two years later. These results coincide with those obtained with other CDI versions, and suggest that the IDHC is an effective and reliable tool.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 121 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This paper was supported by grant 2005/PX128 from the Galician Autonomic Government, and grant SEJ2005-01511/PSIC from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Spanish Government.

References

REFERENCES

Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27, 521–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Goodman, J. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12, 507–584.Google Scholar
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. O. & Basbell, H. (2008 a). Early vocabulary development in Danish and other languages: A CDI-based comparison. Journal of Child Language 35, 619–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. O. & Basbell, H. (2008 b). The Danish Communicative Developmental Inventories: Validity and main 0developmental trends. Journal of Child Language 35, 651–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, M. H. & Haynes, O. M. (1998). Vocabulary competence in early childhood: Measurement, latent construct, and predictive validity. Child Development 69, 654–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caselli, M. C., Casadio, P. & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian. Journal of Child Language 26, 69–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conboy, B. T. & Thal, D. J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development 77, 712–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corkum, V. & Dunham, P. (1996). The Communicative Development Inventory–words short form as an index of language production. Journal of Child Language 23, 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S. (1991). The validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax at 24 months. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 34, 565–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, P. S., Dionne, G., Eley, T. & Plomin, R. (2000). Lexical and grammatical development: A behavioral genetic perspective. Journal of Child Language 27, 619–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S. & Goodman, J. C. (2005). Commonality and individual differences in vocabulary growth. In Tomasello, M. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Beyond nature–nurture. Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates, 41–78. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., Price, T., Bishop, D. & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: I. Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 46, 544–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, J. A. & Marchman, V. A. (2007). Grammar and the lexicon: Developmental ordering in language acquisition. Child Development 78, 190–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S., Fletcher, P., Garman, M., Hughes, A., Letts, C. & Sinka, I. (1997). Escalas de desarrollo del lenguaje de Reynell, 3a edición. Madrid: Psymtec.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M. (2001). Narratives validate communicative development inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics 22, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P. et al. (1993). MacArthur communicative development inventories. User's guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59(5) (serial No. 242).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual, 2nd edn.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Pethick, S., Renda, C., Cox, J. L., Dale, P. S. & Reznick, J. S. (2000). Short-form versions of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D. J., Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Newton, T. & Conboy, B. (2003). MacArthur Inventarios del Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas. User's guide and technical manual. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Bates, E. & Gutierrez-Clellen, V. (1993). Early lexical development in Spanish-speaking infants and toddlers. Journal of Child Language 20(3), 523–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, S. (2007). Lexicon development in French-speaking infants. First Language 27, 227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López Ornat, S., Gallego, C., Gallo, P., Karousou, S., Mariscal, S. & Martínez, M. (2005). MacArthur, Inventario de Desarrollo Comunicativo. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2002). Lexicalist connectionism. In Broeder, P. & Murre, J. (eds), Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches, 9–32. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21, 339–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A. & Martínez-Sussmann, C. (2002). Concurrent validity of caregiver/parent report measures of language for children who are learning both English and Spanish. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 45, 983–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., Martínez-Sussmann, C. & Dale, P. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual learners. Developmental Science 7, 212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J., Sedey, A. & Miolo, G. (1995). Validity of parent report measures of vocabulary development for children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 1037–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, B. A., Rowe, M., Spier, E. & Tamis-Lemonda, C. (2004). Measuring productive vocabulary of toddlers in low-income families: Concurrent and predictive validity of three sources of data. Journal of Child Language 31, 587–608.Google ScholarPubMed
Pérez Pereira, M. (2004). Diferencias individuales en el conocimiento gramatical inicial: Aportaciones del estudio de los niños ciegos. Anuario de Psicología 35, 279–93.Google Scholar
Pérez-Pereira, M. (2008). Early Galician/Spanish bilingualism: Contrasts with monolingualism. In Pérez-Vidal, C., Juan-Garau, M. & Bel, A. (eds), A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain, 39–62. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pérez Pereira, M. & García Soto, X. R. (2003). El diagnóstico del desarrollo comunicativo en la primera infancia: Adaptación de las escalas MacArthur al gallego. Psicothema 15, 352–61.Google Scholar
Pérez Pereira, M. & Resches, M. (2007). Elaboración de las formas breves del Inventario do Desenvolvemento de Habilidades Comunicativas. Datos normativos y propiedades psicométricas. Infancia y Aprendizaje 30, 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, E. & Read, S. (2000). Predictive validity of the New Zealand MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Words and sentences. Journal of Child Language 27, 255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thal, D., Jackson-Maldonado, D. & Acosta, D. (2000). Validity of a parent-report measure of vocabulary and grammar for Spanish-speaking toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1097–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thal, D. J., O'Hanlon, L., Clemmons, M. & Fralin, L. (1999). Validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax for preschool children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 42, 482–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2001). WPPSI, Escala de inteligencia para preescolar y primaria. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar