Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:14:28.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epistemic modality in French children's discourse: to be sure or not to be sure?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Dominique Bassano ,
Maya Hickmann  and
Christian Champaud
Dominique Bassano*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, Paris
Maya Hickmann
Affiliation:
Max Planck Insitut für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen
Christian Champaud
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, Paris
*
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Laboratoire de Psychologie, 54 boulevard Raspail, 75006 Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focuses on the development of epistemic modality, with particular attention to how French children evaluate the conditions of use for modal expressions marking certainty and uncertainty. Sixty children aged four, six and eight were shown films involving verbal interactions in which a target speaker accused another of having performed a deed. The analysis examine children's responses during a subsequent interview in which they were asked to attribute an epistemic attitude of certainty/uncertainty to the target speaker as a function of three factors: (a) whether he had witnessed the deed; (b) whether his accusation was modalized by the verb croire (‘think/believe’); and (c) whether the accusation was true or false. The results show that the four-and six-year-olds attribute certainty more often than the eight-year-olds. This dissymmetry is accompanied by a developmental progression in children's conceptions of these modal categories, which change from a ‘realistic’ conception (mainly based on truth/falsity) at four years to an increasingly metalinguistic and relativized conception thereafter.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 389 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors are grateful to the headmistress and teachers of the schools which cooperated in the study: 20 rue Delambre and 80 boulevard du Montparnasse, 75014 Paris. They acknowledge Françoise Roland and Catherine Marlot for technical and stylistic assistance.

References

REFERENCES

Abbeduto, L. & Rosenberg, S. (1985). Children's knowledge of the presuppositions of ‘know’ and other cognitive verbs, Journal of Child Language 12, 621–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (1988). Developing theories of mind. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. (1982). Etude sur la modalité croire: l'interprétation d'énoncés avec ‘croire que’ chez des enfants de 6 à 11 ans. Archives de Psychologie 50, 165–90.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. (1985 a). Five-years-olds' understanding of ‘savoir’ and ‘croire’ Journal of Child Language 12, 417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D. (1985 b). Modalités de l'opinion: quelques expressions de la croyance et de la certitude et leur différenciation entre 6 et 11 ans. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 5, 65–87.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. (1986). Focusing in statement interpretation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15, 345–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D. (1990). De la logique au langage: vers une psycholinguistique de l'énonciation. Archives de Psychologie 58, 213–34.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. & Champaud, C. (1983). L'interprétation d'énoncés modaux de type assertif (‘savoir que’) chez l'enfant de 6 à 11 ans. L'Année Psychologique 83, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D., Champaud, C. & Hickmann, M. (1988). Statement modalities in reported speech by French children. Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Budapest.Google Scholar
Bassano, D., Champaud, C. & Hickmann, M. (1989). Epistemic modality in French children's discourse. Paper presented at the Biennial meeting at the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City.Google Scholar
Champaud, C. (1985). Acceptation et refus de l'endétermination chez des enfants de 6 à 8 ans. Archives de Psychologie 53, 273–29.Google Scholar
Champaud, C. & Bassano, D. (1984). L'interprétation d'énoncés avec ‘savoir si’ chez des enfants de 6 à 11 ans. Bulletin de Psychologie 364, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champaud, C., Bassano, D. & Hickmann, M. (1992). Modalitié épistémique et discours rapporté chez l'enfant français. In Dittmar, N. & Reich, A. (eds), Modality in language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter (in press).Google Scholar
Gombert, J. E. (1990). le développement métalinguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6, 322–61.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. Explorations in the development of language. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, R. J. (1975). Children's comprehension of complex sentences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 19, 420–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. (1985). Metapragmatics in child language In Mertz, E. & Parmentier, R. J. (eds), Semiotic mediations: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (1992). The boundaries of reported speech: some developmental aspects. In Lucy, J. (ed.), Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: C.U.P. (in press).Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Bassano, D. & Champaud, C. (1990). Children's awareness of epistemic modality: some evidence from reported conversations. Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Stirling.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Champaud, C. & Bassano, D. (in press). Pragmatics and metapragmatics in the development of epistemic modality: evidence from French children's reports of thinkstatements.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. & Warden, D. (1991). Children's narrative strategies when reporting appropriate and inappropriate speech events. Pragmatics 1, 27–70.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. H. E. & Hildyard, A. (1979). Four-year-olds' understanding of pretend and forget: no evidence for prepositional reasoning. Journal of Child Language 6, 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, W. & Weil, J. (1982). Acquisition of epistemic and deontic modals. Journal of Child Language 9, 659–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopmann, M. R. & Maratsos, M. P. (1978). A developmental study of factivity and negation in complex sentences. Journal of Child Language 5, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. N. (1982). Acquisition of mental verbs and the concept of mind. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language development Vol I. Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N. & Maratsos, M. P. (1977). Early comprehension of mental verbs: think and know. Child Development 48, 1743–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. N. & Wellman, H. M. (1980). Children's developing understanding of mental verbs: remember, know, and guess. Child Development 51, 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J., Baker, E. & Olson, C. L. (1976). Four-year-olds' understanding of pretend, forget and know, evidence for prepositional operations. Child Development 47, 62–70.Google Scholar
Miscione, J. L., Marvin, R. S., O'Brien, R. G. & Greenberg, M. T. (1978). A developmental study of preschool children's understanding of the words know and guess. Child Development 49, 1107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. & Davidge, J. (1989). The development of mental terms: pragmatics or semantics? Journal of Child Language 16, 633–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, J. (1988). Developing semantics for theories of mind: from prepositional attitudes to mental representation. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of mind. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Perner, J., Leekam, S. R. & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: the case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5, 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoville, R. P. & Gordon, A. M. (1980). Children's understanding of factive presuppositions: an experiment and a review. Journal of Child Langauge 7, 381–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: a systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition 14, 301–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephany, U. (1986). Modality. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, H. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C. U. P.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (1988). The development of children's understanding of the seeing-knowing distinction. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of mind. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. & Flavell, J. H. (1984). Seeing and believing: children's understanding of the distinction between appearance and reality. Child Development 55, 1710–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellman, H. M. (1988). First steps in the child's theorizing about the mind. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of mind. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. & Bartsch, K. (1988). Young children's reasoning about beliefs. Cognition 30, 239–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellman, H. M. & Estes, D. (1986). Early understanding of mental entities: a re-examination of childhood realism. Child Development 57, 910–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M. & Johnson, C. N. (1979). Understanding mental processes: a developmental study of remember and forget. Child Development 50, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, J. & Sodian, B. (1988). A second stage in children's conception of mental life: understanding informational accesses as origins of knowledge and belief. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of mind. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar