Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:58:36.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency effects in grammatical development: a cross-linguistic, functional approach to form–function mapping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2015

YASUHIRO SHIRAI
YASUHIRO SHIRAI*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 312 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J. & Shirai, Y. (2014). The acquisition of relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language available online: CJO2014. doi:10.1017/S0305000914000300.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (2002). Typology and language acquisition: the case of relative clauses. In Ramat, A. Giacalone (ed.), Typology and second language acquisition, 19–37. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 131–51.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1997). When ‘grammar’ and discourse clash: the problem of source conflicts. In Bybee, J., Hyman, J. & Thompson, S. A. (eds), Essays on language function and language type: dedicated to Talmy Givón, 231–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk, 2nd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y. (2007a). The consequences of variation in the acquisition of relative clauses: an analysis of longitudinal production data from five Japanese children. In Matsumoto, Y., Oshima, D. Y., Robinson, O. W. & Sells, P. (eds), Diversity in language: perspectives and implications, 243–70. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y. (2007b). Does the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 169–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y. (2010). Semantic bias in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses. Journal of Child Language 37, 197–215.Google Scholar
Ryu, J.-Y. & Shirai, Y. (in press). The first language acquisition of the Korean imperfective aspect markers -ko iss-/-a iss-. In Nam, S., Ko, H. & Jun, J. (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 21. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1993). Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese. In Nakajima, H. & Otsu, Y. (eds.), Argument structure: its syntax and acquisition, 185–211. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1994). On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: bioprogram or input? First Language 14, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1998). The emergence of tense–aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition? First Language 18, 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language 71, 743–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Suzuki, Y. (2013). The acquisition of the Japanese imperfective aspect marker: Universal or input frequency? In Frellesvig, B. & Sells, P. (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 20 (pp. 281–293). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., Miyata, S., Naka, N. & Sakazaki, Y. (2000). The acquisition of causative morphology: Why does it correlate with the imperative? In Clark, E. V. (ed.), Thirtieth Child Language Research Forum Proceedings, 87–94. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar