Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-pffzl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T02:36:38.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pronoun reversals: who, when, and why?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Philip S. Dale  and
Catherine Crain-Thoreson
Philip S. Dale*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Catherine Crain-Thoreson
Affiliation:
Western Washington University
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Psychology, University of Washington NI-25, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seventeen of a sample of 30 precocious talkers aged 1;8 produced at least one pronoun reversal (I/you) during unstructured play. This finding led to an examination of the role of cognitive and linguistic individual differences as well as contextual factors and processing complexity as determinants of pronoun reversal. Contrary to predictions derived from previous hypotheses, there were few differences between reversers and non-reversers, other than higher use of second person forms by reversers. Reversals were more likely to occur in certain contexts: semantically reversible predicates with two noun phrases, and in imitations (though the rate of imitation was lower overall in reversers). We propose that pronoun reversals commonly result from a failure to perform a deictic shift, which is especially likely when children's psycholinguistic processing resources are taxed. Children who did not produce any pronoun reversals tended to avoid pronoun use, especially second person forms. Overt reversal may thus reflect a risk-taking approach to language acquisition, which may be particularly characteristic of precocious children.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , October 1993 , pp. 573 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by a grant from the John B. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Network on the Transition from Infancy to Childhood to Nancy Robinson, Philip Dale and Sharon Landesman. We are grateful to Carol Stoel-Gammon for her helpful comments on this paper, and to the parents and children in this project for their enthusiastic participation.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. & Klima, E. S. (1982). The acquisition of three morphological Systems in American Sign Language. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, B. (1967). The empty fortress. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Charney, R. (1980). Speech roles and the development of personal pronouns. Journal of Child Language 7, 509–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (1981). If I were you and you were me: the analysis of pronouns in a pronounreversing child. Journal of Child Language 9, 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: on the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner, J. S. & Garton, A. (eds), Human growth and development: Wolfson College lectures 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1908). A study of the use of self-words by a child. Psychological Revient 15, 339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S., Bates, E., Reznick, J. S. & Morisset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at 20 months. Journal of Child Language 16, 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, W. H. (1979). Personal pronouns and the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 9, 247–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flavell, J. H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fraiberg, S. (1977). Insights from the blind: comparative studies of blind and sighted infants. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Loveland, K. A. (1984). Learning about points of view: spatial perspective and the acquisition of ‘I/you’. Journal of Child Language 11, 535–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38, No. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1981). Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology 17, 170–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima-Takane, Y. (1988). Children learn from speech not addressed to them: the case of Personal pronouns. Journal of Child Language 15, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima-Takane, Y. (1992). Analysis of pronominal errors: a case study. Journal of Child Language 19, 111–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Petito, L. A. (1988). ‘Language’ in the prelinguistic child. In Kessel, F. S. (ed.), The development of language and language researchers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ramer, A. L. (1976). Syntactic styles in emerging language. Journal of Child Language 3, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, N. M., Dale, P. S. & Landesman, S. (1990). Validity of Stanford-Binet IV with linguistically precocious toddlers. Intelligence 14, 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanz, C. (1980). Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar