Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:07:52.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquiring a first language in adolescence: the case of basic word order in American Sign Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2018

Qi CHENG  and
Rachel I. MAYBERRY
Qi CHENG*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California San Diego, USA
Rachel I. MAYBERRY
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California San Diego, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Qi Cheng, Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gillman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0108. E-mail: qcheng@ucsd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that age of acquisition affects the outcomes of learning, especially at the morphosyntactic level. Unknown is how syntactic development is affected by increased cognitive maturity and delayed language onset. The current paper studied the early syntactic development of adolescent first language learners by examining word order patterns in American Sign Language (ASL). ASL uses a basic Subject–Verb–Object order, but also employs multiple word order variations. Child learners produce variable word order at the initial stage of acquisition, but later primarily produce canonical word order. We asked whether adolescent first language learners acquire ASL word order in a fashion parallel to child learners. We analyzed word order preference in spontaneous language samples from four adolescent L1 learners collected longitudinally from 12 months to six years of ASL exposure. Our results suggest that adolescent L1 learners go through stages similar to child native learners, although this process also appears to be prolonged.

Keywords

American Sign Languageword orderage of acquisitionlanguage deprivation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 214 - 240
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarons, D. (1996). Topics and topicalization in American Sign Language. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 30, 65–106.Google Scholar
Anderson, D., & Reilly, J. (2002). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), 83–106.Google Scholar
Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Word order in German: a corpus study. Lingua, 120(3), 717–62.Google Scholar
Berk, S. B. (2003). Sensitive period effects on the acquisition of language: a study of language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Retrieved from <https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3118939/>..>Google Scholar
Berk, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2012). The two-word stage: Motivated by linguistic or cognitive constraints? Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 118–40.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & Slik, F. V. D. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: the case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 298–308.Google Scholar
Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I. (2006). Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 608–35.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coerts, J. A. (1999). Early sign combinations in the acquisition of Sign Language of the Netherlands: evidence for language-specific features. In Chamberlain, C., Morford, J. P., & Mayberry, R. I. (Eds.) (1999). Language acquisition by eye (pp. 91–109). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63(3), 544–73.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O., & Sloetjes, H. (2008). Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008)/3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora (pp. 39–43). Retrieved from <https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_61042/component/file_61043/content>..>Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern-day ‘Wild Child’. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (2007). Word order. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 1, 61–131.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. D. (1975). Influences on word-order change in American Sign Language. In Li, C. (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 1–25). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., & Janis, W. (1990). Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Prillwitz, S. & Vollhaber, T. (Eds.), Current trends in European sign language research: proceedings of the third European Congress on Sign Language Research (pp. 279–94). Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Curtiss, S., Rigler, D., & Rigler, M. (1974). The development of language in Genie: a case of language acquisition beyond the ‘critical period’. Brain and Language, 1(1), 81–107.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Feldman, H. (1977). The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science, 197, 401–3.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1998). Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature, 391(6664), 279–81.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language, 2, 73–113.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, G. M., Adelstein, A., Bryden, M. P., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1998). First-language acquisition in adolescence: evidence for a critical period for verbal language development. Brain and Language, 63(2), 237–55.Google Scholar
Hall, M. L., Ferreira, V. S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2015). Syntactic priming in American Sign Language. PloS one, 10(3), e0119611.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, R. (1978). Word order in the acquisition of ASL. Paper presented at the Third Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA, September.Google Scholar
Kegl, J. (1976). Pronominalization in ASL. Ms, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The sign of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–75.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition: a case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67.Google Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (1980). American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (1986). Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 4(4), 415–44.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., & Berk, S. (2003). Acquisition of constituent order under delayed language exposure. In Beachley, B., Brown, A., & Conlin, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 484–95). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–66.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K. (1997). Verb raising in American Sign Language. Lingua, 103(2), 127–49.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: the case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1258–70.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Lock, E. (2003). Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain and language, 87(3), 369–84.Google Scholar
Morford, J. P. (2003). Grammatical development in adolescent first-language learners. Linguistics, 41(4), 681–722.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 11–28.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., & Meier, R. P. (1985). The acquisition of American Sign Language. In Slobin, D. (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition: the data (Vol. 1, pp. 881–938). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Padden, C. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. L. (2015). ASL word order development in bimodal bilingual children: early syntax of hearing and cochlear-implanted Deaf children from signing families. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC. Retrieved from <https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/46097351/Palmer-Dissy-Final-15Dec01.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1538434972&Signature=RqM%2F3HZ6bNNcV4kQAdOm5d46vyc%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DPhd_Dissertation_ASL_Word_Order_Develop.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Park, T. Z. (1970). Language acquisition in a Korean child. Unpublished manuscript. Psychological Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Pichler, D. C. (2001). Word order variation and acquisition in American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Retrieved from <https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3034026/>..>Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ramírez, N. F., Lieberman, A. M., & Mayberry, R. I. (2013). The initial stages of first-language acquisition begun in adolescence: when late looks early. Journal of Child Language, 40(2), 391–414.Google Scholar
Reilly, J. S., McIntire, M., & Bellugi, U. (1990). The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: grammaticized facial expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(4), 369–92.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1995). Interface strategies: reference-set computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(7), 2661–5.Google Scholar
Schick, B. (2002). The expression of grammatical relations in deaf toddlers learning ASL. In Woll, B. & Morgan, G. (Eds.), An international perspective on the acquisition of sign languages (pp. 143–58). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (Eds.), The genesis of language: a psycholinguistic approach (pp 129–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: a crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229–65.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (1978). Sign language structure. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: functional principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar