Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T19:07:47.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition and generalization of novel object concepts by young language learners*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Gail Ross ,
Katherine Nelson ,
Harriet Wetstone  and
Ellen Tanouye
Gail Ross*
Affiliation:
Cornell University Medical College
Katherine Nelson
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Harriet Wetstone
Affiliation:
Institute for Living, Hartford, CT
Ellen Tanouye
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University
*
* Gail Ross, Perinatology Center, New York Hospital – Cornell Medical Center, 525 E. 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Twenty-month-old children learned to recognize nonsense labels for five novel object concepts and were tested on generalization to variants of these concepts. Children were presented with either one or three examples of each object type during learning sessions. Results showed that receptive learning of names for object concepts was significantly related to a number of possible manipulations specific to each object type and to labelling by children. Children's generalization choices were consistent with adults' ranking of similarity of variants to concept prototypes. Children who learned less well were more likely to generalize to new instances of an object concept and to a greater number of variants if they had been exposed to three rather than one example during training sessions. Results also support the hypothesis that differentiation of objects in interaction is important to the formation of an object concept at this age.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 67 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was supported by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York to William Kessen and Katherine Nelson. The research was carried out when the authors were located at Yale University. We appreciate the assistance of Sally Barnes, Margo Nelson, Janine Eshelman, Lurline deVos, Nancy Kellett and Ira Blake, who made valuable contributions to carrying out the experiment and to its coding and analysis. We are also grateful to graduate students who rated objects and the children and their parents who participated in the study.

References

REFERENCES

Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1978). From reference to meaning. ChDev 49. 969–76.Google Scholar
Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: comprehension and production. JChLang 6. 183–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Benelli, B., D'Odorico, L., Levorato, M. C. & Simon, F. (1977). Formation and extension of the concept in a prelinguistic child. ItalJPsych 4. 429–38.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In Morehead, D. M. & Morehead, A. E. (eds), Normal and deficient language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973) What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1984). The psychology of infant language. PsychRev 1. 63–6.Google Scholar
Franks, J. J. & Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. JExpPsych 90. 65–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Gruendel, J. M. (1977). Referential extension in early language development. ChDev 48. 1567–76.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1976). Meaning in child language. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Schwartz, R. G., Morris, B. & Chapman, K. (1981). Factors influencing early lexical acquisition: lexical orientation and phonological composition. ChDev 52. 882–7.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1939). Speech Development of a bilingual child. Vol. 1. Vocabulary Growth in the first two years. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. (1954). Language development in children. Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973 a). Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. MPQ 19. 21–39.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973 b). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. MonogSocResChDevel 38, No. 149.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsychRev 81. 267–85.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1979). Exploration in the development of a functional semantic system. In Collins, W. (ed.), Children's language and communication. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. Vol. 12. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. & Bonvillian, J. D. (1973). Concepts and words in the two-year-old: acquisition of concept names under controlled conditions. Cognition 2. 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. E. & Bonvillian, J. D. (1978). Early language development: Conceptual growth and related processes between 2 and 4 years of age. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Oviatt, S. L. (1980). The emerging ability to comprehend language: an experimental approach. ChDev 51, 97–106.Google ScholarPubMed
Stern, W. & Stern, C. (1928). Die Kindersprache. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar