Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:06:18.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of infinitival complements: a reply to Bloom, Tackeff & Lahey*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Nina Hyams
Nina Hyams
Affiliation:
UCLA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 1984 , pp. 679 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L., Tackeff, J. & Lahey, M. (1984). Learning to complement constructions. JChLang 11. 391–406.Google ScholarPubMed
Bresnan, J. (1970). On complementizers: towards a syntactic theoory of complement types. FL 6. 297–321.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1978). Towards a realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Koster, J. & May, R. (1982). On the constituency of infinitives. Lg 58. 116–43.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. (1967). The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar