Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T06:04:22.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Elena Pizzuto  and
Maria Cristina Caselli
Elena Pizzuto*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, National Research Council, Rome
Maria Cristina Caselli
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, National Research Council, Rome
*
Istituto di Psicologia, C.N.R., Viale Marx, 15, 00137 Roma, Italy, e-mail: neuro@irmkant.bitnet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the spontaneous acquisition of Italian inflectional morphology by three children (age range 1;4–3;0). Longitudinal, free speech samples are examined, focusing on the development of the morphological paradigms of Italian verbs, pronouns and articles. Data analysis is conducted using criteria appropriate to allow reliable cross-linguistic comparisons with data from English. By this means we evaluate the plausibility of a nativist, parameter-setting account of language development in Italian and English, as recently proposed for these two languages. Results show that the general developmental patterns observed in Italian are not significantly different from those found in English. These findings are not consistent with current interpretations of parameter-setting accounts of language development. Alternative explanatory models are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , October 1992 , pp. 491 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank Elizabeth Bates and Virginia Marchman for their encouragement, time and many thoughtful comments on previous versions of the present paper. We are particularly indebted to Virginia Volterra – Director of our laboratory – for having followed our work with generous participation and yet impartial objectivity. The stimulating comments and criticisms received from three anonymous reviewers and several colleagues of the Institute of Psychology, CNR, Rome, and the Departments of Psychology, Linguistics and Cognitive Science of the University of California, San Diego, are also gratefully acknowledged. We thank the CNR ‘FATMA’ Project for partial financial support.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. & Keenan, E. L. (1985). Deixis. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F. & Parisi, D. (1973). Early language acquisition: a model and some data. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From first word to grammar. Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functional approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1946). Structures des relations de personne dans le verbe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique XLIII, I, 1–12.Google Scholar
Bortolini, U. & Zampolli, A. (1979). Frequenza e distribuzione dei gruppi consonantici nella lingua italiana. Acta Phoniatrica Latina 2, 195–206.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1985). What shapes children's grammars? In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1987). Commentary: mechanisms of language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. (2nd edn.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development 39, 433–48.Google Scholar
Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronouns. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition: studies in first-language development. (2nd edn.) Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1985). The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language 65, 56–80.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A. (1987). The acquisition of Italian morphology: a review. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Language Acquisition and Language Impairment in Children, Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., Taeschner, T. & Caselli, M. C. (1987). Differenze individuali nell'acquisizione della morfosintassi in età scolare. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 2, 91–100.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (1980). The process of rule learning in child speech: a new look. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New-York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2, 267–78.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1985). The acquisition of English. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Drozd, K. F. (1989). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Language 65, 405–13.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1984). Semantically-based child grammars: some empirical inadequacies. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 23, 58–65.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1986 a). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1986 b). Core and peripheral grammar and the acquisition of reflections. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1987). The theory of parameters and syntactic development. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. M. (1988). A principles-and-parameters approach to the study of child language. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 27, 153–61.Google Scholar
Jaeggly, O. & Safir, K. (eds) (1989). The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R. & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language 6, 529–45.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1977). The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 589–600.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, D. (1987). Comments on Hyams. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Sabbadini, L., Leonard, J. & Volterra, V. (1987). Specific language impairment in children: a cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language 32, 233–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. B., Sabbadini, L., Volterra, V. & Leonard, J. (1988). Some influences on the grammar of English- and Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 9, 39–57.Google Scholar
Lepschy, A. L. & Lepschy, G. (1988). The Italian language today. (2nd edn.) London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Loeb, D. F. & Leonard, L. B. (1988). Specific language impairment and parameter theory. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2, 317–27.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
MacNamara, J. (1982). Names for things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 43. No. 1.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (ed.) (1987). Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds) (1989). The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R. & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language 28, 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1983). Some current issues in the study of the acquisition of grammar. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1988). Crosslinguistic analysis, universals, and language acquisition. In Kessel, F. S. (ed.), The development of language and language researchers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: ths ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. (1988). Rules and regularities in the acquisition of the English past tense. CRL Newsletter 4, 4–13.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1981). Procedures for analysing free-speech samples: syntax and semantics. In Miller, J. (ed.), Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W., Peters, A. M. & Masterson, D. (1989). The transition from optional to required subjects. Journal of Child Language 16, 513–29.Google Scholar
Parisi, D. (1976). The past participle. Italian Linguistics 1, 76–106.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. (1979). Further remarks on deixis and anaphora. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. (1989). Morphological development in Italian: tricks or treats? Paper presented at the Seminar on Parallel Distributed Processes and Natural Language, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. (1990). Computerized analyses of patterns of correspondence between input and output in one child's acquisition of Italian verb morphology. Unpublished manuscript. Rome: Institute of Psychology, CNR, 12 1990.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1986). Deixis and anaphora in the acquisition of Italian: the interplay between discourse and morphology. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1989). L'acquisizione della morfologia nello sviluppo del linguaggio spontaneo. Acta Phoniatrica Latina 4, 397–8.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E., Caselli, M. C. & Tangorra, T. (1991). The acquisition of Italian definite articles: insights from the study of natural language and neural networks. Paper presented at the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. A. (1990). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered pereceptron: implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38, 1–60.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 501–57.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (eds) (1987). Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. (1983). Morfologia lessicale. Padua: Clesp.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. (1988). Inflection and derivation. Linguistics 26, 561–81.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985 a). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (ed.) (1985 b). The Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schémas: a Crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12, 229–65.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1988). Language acquisition: learnability, maturation and the fixing of parameters. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5, 235–65.Google Scholar
Smoczynska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Strayer, E. (1977). The development of personal reference in the language of two-year-olds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Montreal, McGill University.Google Scholar
Tangorra, A. (1990). Input e output riconsiderati: analisi computerizzate di alcune regolarità nell'acquisizione dell'italiano. Unpublished dissertation, University of Rome, La Sapienza.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1990). Null subjects: a problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35, 105–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, N. (1987). Italian. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The world's most major languages. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. (1976). A few remarks on the use of the past participle in child language. Italian Linguistics 2, 149–57.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar