Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:02:16.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blind children's language: resolving some differences*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Elaine S. Andersen ,
Anne Dunlea  and
Linda S. Kekelis
Elaine S. Andersen
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Anne Dunlea
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Linda S. Kekelis
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the role of visual perception is central to many theories of language development, researchers have disagreed sharply on the effects of blindness on the acquisition process: some claim major differences between blind and sighted children; others find great similarities. With audio-and video-recorded longitudinal data from six children (with varying degrees of vision) aged 0; 9–3; 4, we show that there ARE basic differences in early language, which appear to reflect differences in cognitive development. We focus here on early lexical acquisition and on verbal role-play, demonstrating how previous analyses have failed to observe aspects of the blind child's language system because language was considered out of the context of use. While a comparison of early vocabularies does suggest surface similarities, we found that when sighted peers are actively forming hypotheses about word meanings, totally blind children are acquiring largely unanalysed ‘labels’. They are slow to extend words and rarely overextended any. Similarly, although verbal role-play appears early, attempts to incorporate this kind of language into conversations with others reveal clear problems with reversibility – specifically, the ability to understand the role of shifting perspectives in determining word meaning. Examination of language in context suggests that blind children have difficulties in just those areas of language acquisition where visual information can provide input about the world and be a stimulus for forming hypotheses about pertinent aspects of the linguistic system.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 1984 , pp. 645 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, E. S. (1975). Cups and glasses: learning that boundaries are vague. JChLang 2. 79–103.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. S. (1978). Lexical universals of body part terminology. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. S. (1981). The emergence of communicative competence in blind children. Second year report to the Spencer Foundation.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. & Kekelis, L. (1982). Effects of visual impairment on early mother–child communication. Paper read at Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. (1979). Prerequisites for reference. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In Morehead, D. & Morehead, A. (eds), Normal and deficient child language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: an investigation of some current conflicts. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds), Development of communication: social and pragmatic factors in language acquisition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Braunwald, S. (1978). Context, word and meaning: towards a communicational analysis of lexical acquisition. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Burlingham, D. (1961). Some notes on the development of the blind. Psychoanalytic study of the child 26. 121–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S. (1982). If I were you and you were me: the analysis of pronouns in a pronoun-reversing child. JChLang 9. 350–80.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: on the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner, J. S. & Garton, A. (eds), Human growth and development. (Wolfson College lectures 1976.) Oxford: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: an introduction topsycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1974). Performing without competence. JChLang 1. 1–10.Google Scholar
Clark, R. (1977). What's the use of imitation? JChLang 4. 341–59.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. (in press). Dissociations between language and cognition: cases and implications. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.Google Scholar
Cutsforth, T. D: (1932). The unreality of words to the blind. Teacher's Forum 4. 86–9.Google Scholar
Dunlea, A. (1982). The role of visual information in the emergence of meaning: a comparison of blind and sighted children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Dunlea, A. (1983). The relationship between concept formation and semantic roles: some evidence from the blind. In Feagans, L., Garvey, C. & Golinkoff, R. (eds), The origins and growth of communication. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fraiberg, S. (1977). Insights from the blind. New York: The New American Library.Google Scholar
Fraiberg, S. & Adelson, E. (1975). Self-representation in language and play: observation of blind children. In Lenneberg, E. & Lenneberg, E. (eds), Foundations of language: a multidisciplinary approach, 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1981). Maturational determinants of language growth. Cognition 10. 103–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Zukow, P. (1978). Why do children say what they say when they say it?: an experimental approach to the psychogenesis of presupposition. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P. & Charney, R. (1983). Emergence of action categories in the child: evidence from verb meanings. PsychRev 90. 72–93.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1981). Children's questions and the discovery of interrogative syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Landau, B. (1983). Blind children's language is not ‘meaningless’. In Mills, A. (ed.), Language acquisition in the blind child. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Landau, B. (1982). Language learning in blind children: relationships between language and perception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (1939–1949). Speech development of a bilingual child (4 volumes). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, A. (1980). The guided reinvention of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. PsychRev 79. 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Maxfield, K. E. (1936). The spoken language of the blind preschool child: a study method. ArchPsychol 201.Google Scholar
Maxfield, K. E. & Buchholz, S. (1957). A social maturity scale for blind preschool children: a guide to its use. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.Google Scholar
Miner, L. E. (1973). A study of the incidence of speech deviations among visually handicapped children. New outlook for the blind 57. 10–14.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973 a). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. MonogrSocResChDevel 38. No. 149.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973 b). Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. MPQ 19. 21–39.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1977). The conceptual basis for naming. In Macnamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1979). Features, contrasts and the FCH: some comments on Barrett's lexical development hypothesis. JChLang 6. 139–46.Google Scholar
Norris, M., Spaulding, P. J. & Brodie, F. H. (1957). Blindness in children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.Schieffelin, B. & Platt, M. (1979). Propositions across utterances and speakers. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1977). Language learning strategies. Lg 53. 560–73.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. R. (1973). Syntax and vocabulary of mothers's speech to young children: age and sex comparisons. ChDev 44. 182–5.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1980). Language and learning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. (1980). Overextensions in early language development. JChLang 7. 321–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, L. (1981). Category development in early language. JChLang 8. 225–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Reynell, J. (1979). Manual for the Reynell–Zinkin scales: developmental scales for young visually handicapped children. Part I: Mental development. Windsor, Berks: N.F.E.R.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1979). A real early stage: an unzippered condensation of a dissertation on child language. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press:Google Scholar
Snow, C. (1981). The uses of imitation. JChLang 8. 205–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Snow, C., Arlman-Rupp, A., Hassing, Y., Jobse, J., Joosten, J. & Vorster, J. (1976). Mother's speech in three social classes. JPsycholingRes 5. 1–20.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds). (1977). Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Urwin, C. (1978 a). The development of communication between blind infants and their parents: some ways into language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, King's College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Urwin, C. (1978)b). The development of communication between blind infants and their parents. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol; the emergence of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Urwin, C. (1979). Preverbal communication and early language development in blind children. PRCLD 17. 119–27.Google Scholar
Warren, D. (1977). Blindness and early childhood development. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.Google Scholar
Warren, D. (1978). Childhood visual impairment: perspectives on research design and methodology. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 12. 404–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar