Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-2jdt9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T05:15:24.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehension and production of comparatives and superlatives*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Thomas L. Layton  and
Sheldon L. Stick
Thomas L. Layton
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sheldon L. Stick
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska at Lincoln
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ten objects were used to assess comprehension, production, and imitation of comparative and superlative suffixes in 100 children ranging in age from 2; 6 to 4; 6. The results indicated that comprehension of both suffix forms was similar at each of five age levels studied; although incrementally better comprehension scores occurred with succeeding ages. Virtually all subjects were successful in imitating forms missed during the comprehension task. Analysis revealed that the -er suffix was produced more often than the -est suffix, at the youngest age (2; 6): at succeeding age levels this difference was reversed. Big was the primary lexical unit selected by the subjects for positive and negative polar forms connoting size; little was the second most frequently used adjective form.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 1979 , pp. 511 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Thomas L. Layton, Institute of Speech and Hearing Sciences, The University of North Carolina, G-06 Wing D, Medical School, 208H Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514. U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, E. J. (1976). Sizing things up: the acquisition of the meaning of dimensional adjectives. JChLang 3. 205–19.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P. (1976). Language and communication in the mentally handicapped. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. S. & Miller, J. F. (1975). Word order in early two and three word utterances: does production precede comprehension? JSHR 18. 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1972). On the child's acquisition of antonyms in two semantic fields. JLVB 11. 750–58.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1970). The primitive nature of children's relational concepts. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Dever, R. B. (1972). A comparison of the results of a revised version of Berko's test of morphology with the free speech of mentally retarded children. JSpHearRes 15. 169–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Dever, R. B. & Gardner, W. I. (1970). Performance of normal and retarded boys on Berko's test of morphology. L & S 13. 162–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, M. & Balfour, G. (1968). Less is more: a study of language and comprehension in children. BrJPsych 59. 461–72.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1976). Comprehension and production of adjectives and seriation. JChLang 3. 369–84.Google Scholar
Fernald, C. D. (1972). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production: problems of replication. JVLVB 11. 606–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. JVLVB 3. 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivimey, G. P. (1975). The development of English morphology: an acquisition model. L & S 18. 120–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Jarvella, R. J. & Sinnott, J. (1972). Contextual constraints on noun distributions to some English verbs by children and adults. JVLVB 11. 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, T. L. (1976). Comprehension and production of selected linguistic constructions in preschool aged children. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nebraska at Lincoln.Google Scholar
Layton, T. L. & Greene, J. (1978). The use of objects to predict receptive and expressive language abilities in children. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lovell, K. & Bradbury, B. (1967). The learning of English morphology in educationally subnormal special school children. AmerJMentDef 71. 609–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Lovell, K. & Dixon, E. M. (1967). The growth of the control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. JChPsychPsychiat 8. 31–9.Google Scholar
Martin, J. & Engel, B. (1978). A comparison of two procedures (NSST and Concrete Objects) for measuring receptive and expressive language of mentally retarded children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 9. 176–82.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. & Looney, P. L. (1972). A problem of language disorder: length versus structure. JSHR 15. 264–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz, M. G. & Layton, T. L. (1977). Comparative/superlatives: a function of conservation abilities? Paper presented at the annual American Speech and Hearing Association Convention,Chicago.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S. (1964). The development of grammar in child language. In Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (eds), The acquisition of language. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. 29 (92), 9–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Nurss, J. R. & Day, D. E. (1971). Imitation, comprehension, and production of grammatical structures. JVLVB 10. 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair-de-Zwart, H. (1969). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds), Studies in cognitive development. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Welsh, C. A. (1971). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. In Lauatelli, C. S. (ed.), Language training in early childhood education. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1970). An experimental approach to children's linguistic competence. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wales, R. J. & Campbell, R. (1970). On the development of comparison and the comparison of development. In d'Arcais, G. B. Flores & Levelt, W. J. J. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar