Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:03:22.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextual priority: verbal shift at seven?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

John R. Muma  and
Carol L. Zwycewicz-Emory
John R. Muma
Affiliation:
Texas Technological University
Carol L. Zwycewicz-Emory
Affiliation:
Winooski, Vermont
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Developmental changes in verbal responses to systematic variations in linguistic contexts contrast with the data reported in the syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift studies. The present study indicates a protracted developmental shift extending from five years of age beyond nine years of age. Apparently the first priority is to create a linguistic context when none is given; once a linguistic context is realized, semantic-syntactic equivalences have priority, followed by differentiation and then integration.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 301 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braine, M. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 41, No. 164.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Berko, J. (1960). Word association and the acquisition of grammar. ChDev 31. 1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J., Davies, P. & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. & Miller, J. (1975). Word order in early two and three word utterances: does production precede comprehension? JSHR 18. 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, H. & Gekoski, W. (1976). Interactive and categorical grouping strategies and the syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift. ChDev 47. 1116–21.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. (1966). Form class and children's word association. JVLVB 5. 558–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D., Forsyth, D. & Muuss, R. (1964). The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift in children's word associations. JVLVB 3. 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, S. (1961). Changes with age in the verbal determinants of word association. AmJPsych 74. 361–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Francis, H. (1972). Toward an explanation of the syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift. ChDev 43. 949–58.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L., Gleitman, H. & Shipley, E. (1972). The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition 1. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1966). A study of word association. JVLVB 5. 548–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muma, J., Perry-Adams, M. & Gallagher, J. (1974). Some semantic properties in sentence perception. PsychReports 35. 23–32.Google Scholar
Muma, J. (1975). The communication game: dump and play. JSHD 40. 296–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palermo, D. (1971). Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology? Science Studies 1. 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. (1974). Squishing. In Burtinsky, E. (ed.), Festschrift for Martin Joos. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. (1974). Relational concepts underlying language. In Schiefelbusch, R. & Lloyd, L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Suci, G. & Hamacher, J. (1972). Psychological dimensions of case in sentence processing: action role and animateness. Linguistics 89. 34–48.Google Scholar
White, S. (1965). Evidence for hierarchical arrangement processes. In Lipsitt, L. & Spiker, C. (eds), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. II. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woodrow, H. & Lowell, F. (1916). Children's association frequency tables. PsychMonogr 22, No. 97.Google Scholar