Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:33:20.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing communicative competence: a longitudinal study of the acquisition of mental state terms and indirect requests*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2014

HANNAH DE MULDER
HANNAH DE MULDER*
Affiliation:
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This longitudinal study involving 101 Dutch four- and five-year-olds charts indirect request (IR) and mental state term (MST) understanding and investigates the role that Theory of Mind (ToM) and general linguistic ability (vocabulary, syntax, and spatial language) play in this development. The results showed basic understanding of IR and MST in four-year-olds, but full understanding had not been reached even at five years old. Furthermore, although ToM predicted both IR and MST when linguistic ability was not taken into account, this relationship was no longer significant once the language measures were added. Linguistic ability thus seems to play an important role in the development of both IR and MST. Additional analyses revealed that whereas syntactic ability was the primary predictor of IR, spatial language was the best predictor of MST, suggesting that IR relies primarily on general linguistic skills, but that more specific aspects of language may bootstrap MST.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 969 - 1005
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I would like to thank the children and staff of the following schools: Dr H. Pierson (Rotterdam), De Margriet (Rotterdam), Prinses Beatrix (Rotterdam), and De Overlaet (Rosmalen) for their participation and collaboration. I am very grateful to Peter Coopmans and Frank Wijnen for their help and support in all aspects of this study. Ellen Hamaker kindly helped me with the statistical aspects of this paper. Thanks also go to Anne-Marit van Dam, Aster Dijkgraaf, Lilian van der Geugten, Floor Landa, Renske Maes, Lea ter Meulen, Miranda Nelck, Marthe Rottier, Annette Watzema, and Lisanne van Weelden for their assistance during the experiments.

References

REFERENCES

Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. A. (2005).Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astington, J. W. & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relationship between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology 35, 1311–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition 21, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bascelli, E. & Barbieri, M. S. (2002). Italian children's understanding of the epistemic and deontic modal verbs dovere (must) and potere (may). Journal of Child Language 29, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, J., Laval, V. & Chaminaud, S. (2007). Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics 39, 2115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, J. & Legros, S. (1987). Direct and indirect directives: What do young children understand? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 43, 346–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, J. R. & Hall, W. S. (1995). Development of the understanding of the polysemous meanings of the mental-state verb know . Cognitive Development 10, 529–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, J. R., Hall, W. S., Robison, G. C. & Yeong Kim, S. (1997). Acquisition of the mental state verb know by 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26, 581–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrnes, J. P. & Duff, M. A. (1989). Young children's comprehension of modal expressions. Cognitive Development 4, 369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H., Chen, H. & Yeung, W. (2009). Relations between mental verb and false belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 104, 141–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creem-Regehr, S. H., Gagnon, K. T., Geuss, M. N. & Stefanucci, J. K. (2013). Relating spatial perspective taking to the perception of other's affordances: providing a foundation for predicting the future behaviour of others. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. A. (eds), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 186–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua 117, 1858–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, J. G. & Pyers, J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false belief understanding. Cognitive Development 17, 1037–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elrod, M. M. (1987). Children's understanding of indirect requests. Journal of Genetic Psychology 148, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5, 25–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R. & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance–reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology 15, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gola, A. A. H. (2012). Mental verb input for promoting children's theory of mind: a training study. Cognitive Development 24, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance–reality distinction. Child Development 59, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W. S., Scholnick, E. K. & Hughes, A. T. (1987). Contextual constraints on usage of cognitive words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 16, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, W. & Weil, J. (1982). Acquisition of epistemic and deontic meaning of modals. Journal of Child Language 9, 659–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. B., Wilcox, M. J., Fulmer, K. C. & Davis, G. A. (1978). Understanding indirect requests: an investigation of children's comprehension of pragmatic meanings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 21, 528–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology 25, 353–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukusa, S. & Moilanen, I. (2009). Pragmatic inference abilities in individuals with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism: a review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 3, 890–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpine, L. M. & Moore, C. L. (1995). The development of social understanding in children with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 89, 349–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W. & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development 77, 622–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minter, M., Hobson, R. P. & Bishop, M. (1998). Congenital visual impairment and ‘theory of mind’. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 16, 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, H. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011). How does it look? Level 2 perspective-taking at 36 months of age. Child Development 82, 661–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, H. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Level 1 perspective-taking at 24 months of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 603–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Bryant, D. & Furrow, D. (1989). Mental terms and the development of certainty. Child Development 60, 167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. & Davidge, J. (1989). The development of mental terms: Pragmatics or semantics? Journal of Child Language 16, 633–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C., Pure, K. & Furrow, D. (1990). Children's understanding of the modal expressions of speaker certainty and uncertainty and its relation to the development of a representational theory of mind. Child Development 61, 722–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. A., Ho, S. & Sera, M. (1996). Children's understanding of epistemic modals. Journal of Child Language 23, 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J., Leekam, S. R. & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three year olds’ difficulty with false belief: the case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5, 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M. & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: a systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition 14, 301–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spekman, N. J. & Roth, F. P. (1985). Preschool children's comprehension and production of directive forms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14, 331–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eldik, M. C. M., Schlichting, L. E. P. T., Lutje Spelberg, H. C., van der Meulen, B. F. & van der Meulen, S. (1995). Reynell test voor taalbegrip. Nijmegen: Berkhout.Google Scholar
Vinden, P. G. (1996). Junín Quechua children's understanding of mind. Child Development 67, 1707–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziatas, K., Durkin, K. & Pratt, C. (1998). Belief term development in children with autism, Asperger syndrome, specific language impairment, and normal development: links to theory of mind development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39, 755–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed