Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:21:50.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of infant-directed speech on early multimodal communicative production in Spanish and Basque

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Irati DE PABLO ,
Eva MURILLO  and
Asier ROMERO
Irati DE PABLO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, Universidad del País Vasco, Spain
Eva MURILLO*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psicología Básica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Asier ROMERO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, Universidad del País Vasco, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Departamento de Psicología Básica. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049. Madrid. Spain. E-mail: eva.murillo@uam.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyzed the effect of infant-directed speech (IDS) on multimodal communicative production of children at the beginning of the second year of life in two different languages: Spanish and Basque. Twelve Spanish and twelve Basque children aged between 12 and 15 months observed two versions of an audiovisual story: one version was narrated with IDS and the other with adult-directed speech (ADS). We analyzed the use of gaze and the communicative behaviors produced by children. The time spent looking at the story increases in the IDS condition regardless of the language of the narration. Children produced more multimodal communicative behaviors while watching the IDS version both in Spanish and in Basque. These results suggest that IDS increases attention and social engagement promoting joint attention episodes.

Keywords

infant-directed speechmultimodal communicationlanguage developmentgesturesvocalizations
Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 47 , Special Issue 2: The Influence of Input Quality and Communicative Interaction on Language Development Part 2 , March 2020 , pp. 457 - 471
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acredolo, L., & Goodwin, S. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59(2), 450–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aureli, T., Spinelli, M., Fasolo, M., Garito, M. C., Perucchini, P., & D'Odorico, L. (2017). The pointing–vocal coupling progression in the first half of the second year of life. Infancy, 22(6), 801–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech: when hand and mouth come together. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 235–58). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadime, I., Silva, C., Santos, S., Ribeiro, I., & Viana, F. L. (2017). The interrelatedness between infants’ communicative gestures and lexicon size: a longitudinal study. Infant Behavior and Development, 48, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capobianco, M., Pizzuto, E. A., & Devescovi, A. (2017). Gesture–speech combinations and early verbal abilities. Interaction Studies, 18(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development, 61(5), 1584–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteve-Gibert, N., & Prieto, P. (2014). Infants temporally coordinate gesture–speech combinations before they produce their first words. Speech Communication, 57, 301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasolo, M., & D'Odorico, L. (2012). Gesture-plus-word combinations, transitional forms, and language development. Gesture, 12, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8(2), 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 64(3), 637–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández, B. (2016). Euskera para castellano hablantes. Donostia: Erein.Google Scholar
Glenn, S. M., & Cunningham, C. C. (1983). What do babies listen to most? A developmental study of auditory preferences in nonhandicapped infants and infants with Down's syndrome. Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 332–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Butcher, C. (2003). Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19(5), 515–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Can, D. D., Soderstrom, M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2015). (Baby) talk to me: the social context of infant-directed speech and its effects on early language acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 339–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieser, D. L., & Kuhl, P. K. (1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, A., Tamekawa, Y., & Kiritani, S. (2001). Developmental change in auditory preferences for speech stimuli in Japanese infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1189–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Owen, M. T., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A., … & Suma, K. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children's language success. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1071–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Igualada, A., Bosch, L., & Prieto, P. (2015). Language development at 18 months is related to multimodal communicative strategies at 12 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 39, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16, 367–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, P. S., Goldstein, M. H., Huckeby, E. R., Owren, M. J., & Cooper, R. P. (1995). Dishabituation of visual attention by infant- versus adult-directed speech: effects of frequency modulation and spectral composition. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(2), 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karzon, R. G. (1985). Discrimination of polysyllabic sequences by one- to four-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(2), 326–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Gillis, S. (2005). Diminutives in child-directed speech supplement metric with distributional word segmentation cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 145–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitamura, C., Thanavishuth, C., Burnham, D., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2002). Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant behavior and Development, 24(4), 372–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P., Andruski, J., Chistovich, I., Chistovich, L., Kozhevnikova, E., Ryskina, V., … & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41, 841–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F. (2008). Segmental properties of input to infants: a study of Korean. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 591–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majorano, M., & D'Odorico, L. (2011). The transition into ambient language: a longitudinal study of babbling and first word production of Italian children. First Language, 31(1), 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer, D. J. (1981). The identification of names in maternal speech to infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10(1), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M., Carreiras, M., & Gervain, J. (2016). Language dominance shapes non-linguistic rhythmic grouping in bilinguals. Cognition, 152, 150–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murillo, E., & Belinchón, M. (2012). Gestural–vocal coordination: longitudinal changes and predictive value on early lexical development. Gesture, 12, 16–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, E., & Belinchón, M. (2013). Patrones comunicativos multimodales en la transición a las primeras palabras: cambios en la coordinación de gestos y vocalizaciones. [Multimodal communicative patterns on the transition to first words: changes in the coordination of gesture and vocalization]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R. S., & Hussain, I. (2006). Changes in preference for infant-directed speech in low and moderate noise by 4.5-to 13-month-olds. Infancy, 10(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papousek, M., Papousek, H., & Bornstein, M. H. (1985). The naturalistic vocal environment of young infants: on the significance of homogeneity and variability in parental speech. In Field, T. & Fox, N. (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 269–97). Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pegg, J. E., Werker, J. F., & McLeod, P. J. (1992). Preference for infant-directed over adult-directed speech: evidence from 7-week-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 15(3), 325–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Esparza, N., García-Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2014). Look who's talking: speech style and social context in language input to infants are linked to concurrent and future speech development. Developmental Science, 17(6), 880–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Räsänen, O., Kakouros, S., & Soderstrom, M. (2018). Is infant-directed speech interesting because it is surprising? Linking properties of IDS to statistical learning and attention at the prosodic level. Cognition, 178, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, A., Etxebarria, A., de Pablo, I., & Romero, A. (2017). Interrelación entre gestos y vocalizaciones en funciones comunicativas tempranas: Evidencias desde la lengua vasca [Interrelation between gestures and vocalizations in early communicative functions: Evidence from the Basque language]. Revista signos, 50(93), 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Saint-Georges, C., Chetouani, M., Cassel, R., Apicella, F., Mahdhaoui, A., Muratori, F., … & Cohen, D. (2013). Motherese in interaction: at the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (A systematic review). PloS one, 8(10), e78103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santazilia, E., & Zubiri, J. J. (2014). La salvaguarda del lenguaje infantil en euskera en apoyo a la transmisión lingüística en Navarra [Fostering Basque child-directed speech to support language transmission in Navarre]. In Salaberri, P. (Ed.) El patrimonio cultural inmaterial: ámbito de la tradición oral y de las particularidades lingüísticas. Pamplona, Navarra: Cátedra Archivo del patrimonio inmaterial de Navarra.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99(2), 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, J., & Newman, R. S. (2015). Infant preferences for structural and prosodic properties of infant-directed speech in the second year of life. Infancy, 20(3), 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, O., Nir-Sagiv, B., Kishon-Rabin, L., & Ravid, D. (2009). Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 36(3), 629–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Current Biology, 18(9), 668–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soderstrom, M. (2007). Beyond babytalk: re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review, 27(4), 501–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, M., Fasolo, M., & Mesman, J. (2017). Does prosody make the difference? A meta-analysis on relations between prosodic aspects of infant-directed speech and infant outcomes. Developmental Review, 44, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., & McLeod, P. J. (1989). Infant preference for both male and female infant-directed talk: a developmental study of attentional and affective responsiveness. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 43(2), 230–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., Pons, F., Dietrich, C., Kajikawa, S., Fais, L., & Amano, S. (2007). Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese. Cognition, 103(1), 147–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Z., & Gros-Louis, J. (2014). Infants’ prelinguistic communicative acts and maternal responses: relations to linguistic development. First Language, 34, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Pablo et al. supplementary material

De Pablo et al. supplementary material 1

Download De Pablo et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 29.7 MB

De Pablo et al. supplementary material

De Pablo et al. supplementary material 2

Download De Pablo et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 28.5 MB

De Pablo et al. supplementary material

De Pablo et al. supplementary material 3

Download De Pablo et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 29.3 MB

De Pablo et al. supplementary material

De Pablo et al. supplementary material 4

Download De Pablo et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 29.2 MB