Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:26:02.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elizabeth Bates, Inge Bretherton & Lynn Snyder, From first'words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge: C.U.P., 1988. Pp. xii + 326.

Review products

Elizabeth Bates, Inge Bretherton & Lynn Snyder, From first'words to grammar: individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge: C.U.P., 1988. Pp. xii + 326.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Elena Lieven
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Julian Pine
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Hafitz, E. & Lifter, K. (1980). Schematic organisation of verbs in child language and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Language 6. 386412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40. No. 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I., McNew, S., Snyder, L. & Bates, E. (1983). Individual differences at 20 months: analytic and holistic strategies in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10. 293320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Choi, S. (1987). Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences: a crosslinguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. Paper presented at the Boston Child Language Conference, Boston University, 10 1987.Google Scholar
Harris, M., Barrett, M., Jones, D. & Brookes, S. (1988). Linguistic input and early word meaning. Journal of Child Language 15. 7794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M. (1982). Context, process and progress in young children's speech. In Beveridge, M. (ed.), Children thinking through language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M., Dresner Barnes, H. & Pine, J. (in prep.). Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38. No. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language acquisition: acquiring communicative competence in a Western Samoan village. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (1977). Language learning strategies: does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 53. 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Pine, J. & Lieven, E. V. M. (in press). Referential style at 13 months: why age-defined crosssectional measures are inappropriate for the study of strategy differences in early language development. Journal of Child Language.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1979). Getting it together: an ethnographic approach to the study of the development of communicative competence. In Ochs, E. O. & Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. (1981). The use of imitation. Journal of Child Language 8. 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed