Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:39:06.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Input effects in the acquisition of verb inflection: Evidence from Emirati Arabic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2021

Marta SZREDER ,
Laura E. DE RUITER Open the ORCID record for Laura E. DE RUITER [Opens in a new window]  and
Dimitrios NTELITHEOS
Marta SZREDER*
Affiliation:
Department of Speech Language Pathology, United Arab Emirates University
Laura E. DE RUITER
Affiliation:
Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, Tufts University, USA
Dimitrios NTELITHEOS
Affiliation:
Department of Speech Language Pathology, United Arab Emirates University
*
Address for correspondence: Marta Szreder, United Arab Emirates University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Speech Language Pathology, PO Box 15551 Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. E-mail: marta.szreder@uaeu.ac.ae
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the acquisition of the Imperfective verb inflection paradigm in Emirati Arabic (EA), to determine whether the learning process is sensitive to the phonological and typological properties of the input. We collected data from 48 participants aged 2;7 to 5;9 years, using an elicited production paradigm. Input frequencies of inflectional contexts, verb types and tokens were obtained from corpora of child-directed and adult EA. Children's accuracy was inversely related to the input frequency of inflectional contexts, but not related to type and token frequency or phonological neighborhood density. Token frequency interacted with age, such that younger children performed considerably worse on low-frequency tokens, but older children performed equally well on high- and low-frequency tokens. We conclude that learning is input-driven, but that a sufficiently regular paradigm allows children to eventually generalise across all items earlier than in previously studied European languages.

Keywords

verb inflectionmorphological acquisitionacquisition of Arabicinput-driven learningfrequency effects
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 684 - 713
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot-Smith, K., & Serratrice, L. (2015). Word order, referential expression, and case cues to the acquisition of transitive sentences in Italian. Journal of Child Language, 42(1), 1–31.10.1017/S0305000913000421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdalla, F. (2002). Specific language impairment in Arabic-speaking children: deficits in morphosyntax. Unpublished PhD thesis, McGill University, Canada.Google Scholar
Abdou, D., & Abdou, S. (1986). Dirasa fi mufradat tiflayn. (A study on two children). Kuwait City: Dhaat al-Salaasil Publication.Google Scholar
Ackema, P., & Neeleman, A. (2018). Features of person: From the inventory of persons to their morphological realization. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11145.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado-Orea, J., & Pine, J. M. (2015). Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child spanish. PLoS ONE, 10(3).10.1371/journal.pone.0119613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albirini, A. (2017). The acquisition of Arabic as a first language. In Benmamoun, E. & Bassiouney, R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics (pp. 227–248). Routledge.10.4324/9781315147062-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Kaabi, M., & Ntelitheos, D. (2019). Rethinking templates: A syntactic analysis of verbal morphology in Emirati Arabic. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 132.10.5334/gjgl.428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aljenaie, K. (2010). Verbal inflection in the acquisition of Kuwaiti Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 37, 841–863.10.1017/S0305000909990031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aljenaie, K. (2001). The emergence of tense and agreement in Kuwaiti Arabic children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 239–273.10.1017/S030500091400049XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, M. E., & Tomasello, M. (1994). The rest of the family: The role of fathers and siblings in early language development. In Gallaway, C. & Richards, B. J. (eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (p. 109–134). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620690.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaffar, F. M., & Safi, S. M. (2012). The Acquisition of Verb Inflections in Hijazi Arabic. Arab World English Journal, 3(2), 266–304.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 3–76. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 255–63. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, R. A. (1973). First language. Allen & Unwin Ltd.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Language Structure. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/tsl.45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children's understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2).10.1515/COGL.2009.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiat, S. (1986). Personal pronouns. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 339–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620683.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner, J. S. & Garton, A. (eds.), Human growth and development: Wolfson College lectures 1976 (pp. 85–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2008). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4).10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J.G., & Johnson, V. (2007). The information in third-person /s/: acquisition across dialects of American English. Journal of Child Language, 34, 133–158.10.1017/S0305000906007768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (2018). Prosodic constraints on children's use of grammatical morphemes. First Language, 39, 80–95.10.1177/0142723717751984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(3), 274–90. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology 5(July), 1–17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelmann, F., Granlund, S., Kolak, J., Szreder, M., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., Theakston, A., & Lieven, E. (2019). How the input shapes the acquisition of verb morphology: Elicited production and computational modelling in two highly inflected languages. Cognitive Psychology, 110, 30–69.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.02.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahim, D. (2017). Verb Morphology in Egyptian Arabic Developmental Language Impairment. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
Feghali, H. J. (2008). Gulf Arabic: The dialects of Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, and Oman. Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar
Gabry, J., & Goodrich, B. (2016). Rstanarm: Bayesian Applied Regression Modeling via Stan. R Package Version 2(1).Google Scholar
Granlund, S., Kolak, J., Vihman, V., Engelmann, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., & Lieven, E. (2019). Language-general and language-specific phenomena in the acquisition of inflectional noun morphology: A cross-linguistic elicited-production study of Polish, Finnish and Estonian. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 169–194.10.1016/j.jml.2019.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1966). Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1996). The format of representation of recognized words in the infants’ early receptive lexicon. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 463–481.10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90007-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haman, E., Etenkowski, B., Łuniewska, M., Szwabe, J., Dąbrowska, E., Szreder, M., & Łaziński, M. (2011). The Polish CDS corpus.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. (2000). Pronoun acquisition and the morphological feature geometry. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 22, 1–14. Calgary: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). A feature-geometric analysis of person and number. Language, 78, 482–526.10.1353/lan.2002.0158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T., & Hyams, N. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106(1–4), 81–112.10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00030-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holes, C. (1995). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions and varieties. Longman.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1963). Implications of language universals for linguistics. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of language (pp. 263–278). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, T.M. (1967). Eastern Arabian dialect studies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khalifa, S., Habash, N., Eryani, F., Obeid, O., Abdulrahim, D., & Al Kaabi, M. (2018). A Morphologically Annotated Corpus of Emirati Arabic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan.Google Scholar
Krajewski, G., & Lieven, E. (2014). Competing cues in early syntactic development. In MacWhinney, B., Malchukov, A., & Moravcsik, E. A. (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S.A., (1979). Evidence for a language learning strategy: On the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes. Child Development, 51(1), 1–13.10.1111/j.1467-8624.1979.tb02972.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, A., & Smith, L. (2007). Pronouns and verbs in adult speech to children: A corpus analysis. Journal of Child Language, 34, 725–763.10.1017/S0305000907008136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Y. (1983). It's frogs all the way down. Cognition, 15, 75–93.10.1016/0010-0277(83)90034-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legendre, G., Culbertson, J., Zaroukian, E., Hsin, L., Barriére, I., & Nazzi, T. (2014). Is children's comprehension of subject-verb agreement universally late? Comparative evidence from French, English, and Spanish. Lingua, 144, 21–39.Google Scholar
Leung, T., Ntelitheos, D., & Al Kaabi, M. (2021). Emirati Arabic: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua, 120, 2546–2556.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C., & Demuth, K. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: Crosslinguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H., Tano, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 407–418). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The Competition Model. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities. PLoS ONE 7(8).10.1371/journal.pone.0043230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannle, S., & Tomasello, M. (1987). Fathers, siblings, and the bridge hypothesis. In Nelson, K. E. & van Kleeck, A. (eds), Children's Language (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum), Vol. 6, 23–42.Google Scholar
Moawad, R.A. (2006). The Acquisition of the Arabic Gender and Number Systems. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Wales, Bangor.Google Scholar
Morey, R.D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J.N., Lee, M.D., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2016). The Fallacy of Placing Confidence in Confidence Intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Statistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part II. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(11), 591–613. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ntelitheos, D., & Idrissi, A. (2017). Language growth in child Emirati Arabic. In Ouali, H. (ed.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Omar, M. (1973). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110819335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qafisheh, H. (1977). A short reference grammar of Gulf Arabic. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Qasem, F., & Sircar, S. (2017). Imperative as root infinitive analogue in Yemeni Ibbi Arabic: Two case studies. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2016). An elicited-production study of inflectional verb morphology in child Finnish. Cognitive Science, 40, 1704–1738.10.1111/cogs.12305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santelmann, L. (1998). The acquisition of definite determiners in child Swedish: Metrical and discourse influences on functional morphology. In Greenhill, A., Hughes, M., Littlefield, H. & Walsh, H. (eds.), BUCLD 22 Proceedings, 651–662. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Savičiūtė, E., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2018). The roles of word-form frequency and phonological neighbourhood density in the acquisition of Lithuanian noun morphology. Journal of Child Language, 45(3), 641–672.10.1017/S030500091700037XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2007). Geminate Template: A model for first Finnish words. First Language, 27(4), pp. 347–359.10.1177/0142723707081728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoczyńska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues (p. 595–686). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Snow, C. (1995). Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds.) The handbook of child language. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Song, J., Sundara, M., & Demuth, K. (2009). Phonological constraints on children's production of English third person singular –s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52:623–642.10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0258)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, T., Hohenstein, S., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 175–200. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.12.3. p. 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan Development Team (2020). RStan: The R Interface to Stan.Google Scholar
Szreder, M. (2013). The acquisition of consonant clusters in Polish – A case study. In Vihman, M., & Keren-Portnoy, T.. (eds.), Child Phonology: Whole word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Theodore, R.M., Demuth, K., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2011). Acoustic evidence for positional and complexity effects in children's production of plural -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 539–548.10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0035)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A., & Halle, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 336–353.10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106(1–4), 23–79.10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00029-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar