Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-zzvtc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T02:35:53.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M. Bowerman, Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. London: C.U.P., 1973. Pp xii + 302.

Review products

M. Bowerman, Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. London: C.U.P., 1973. Pp xii + 302.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Patrick Griffiths
Patrick Griffiths
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , May 1974 , pp. 111 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. (1971). The grammar of case. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1970). Language and psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure. Lg 39. 1–13.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1971). The acquisition of language in infant and child. In Reed, C. E. (ed.), The learning of language. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. N. E. (1890). A Finnish grammar. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1966). Comments on Slobin's presentation. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. (1973). A structural principle of language and its implications. Lg 49. 47–66.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1966). Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech’. JL 2. 209–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1967). A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. FL 3. 390–6.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1966). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. (1969). Case, category, and configuration. JL 6. 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvageot, A. (1949). Esquisse de la langue finnoise. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Staal, J. F. (1967). Word order in Sanskrit and universal grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar