Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-28T06:03:34.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal speech and the child's development of syntax: a further look*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Erika Hoff-Ginsberg
Erika Hoff-Ginsberg*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Parkside
*
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, Wisconsin 53141, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study compared four categories of maternal utterances that were found in a previous study (Hoff-Ginsberg, 1986) to predict children's rates of syntax development to a category of maternal utterances that was unrelated to syntax development. The comparisons were designed to test the hypotheses that maternal utterances which benefit syntax development do so by providing syntactically rich data or by eliciting conversation from the child. Data-providing and conversation-eliciting characteristics of the selected categories of maternal utterances were assessed from the same transcripts of 22 mothers interacting with their 2½-year-old children that had provided the database for the earlier study of predictive relations. Each of the three positive predictor categories of maternal utterances differed from the unrelated category — in more frequently illustrating the affected aspect of syntax development, in eliciting more speech from the child, or both. Neither of these characteristics was true of the negative predictor category. The pattern of results suggested that maternal speech supports the child's development of syntax by engaging the child in linguistic interaction and also by providing illustrations of the structures the child acquires.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 85 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported, in different phases, by NIMH grant MH30996 to Marilyn Shatz and by NSF dissertation grant BNS-8020335, NIMH grant MH39693, and NICHD grant HD20936-02 to the author. I am grateful to Patricia Johnson for help in data coding and analysis, to Joel Levin for statistical advice, and to Melissa Bowerman, Steven Pinker, Paul Yoder, and several anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this work. Preliminary reports of this research were presented to the Society for Research in Child Development at the 1985 and 1987 meetings.

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, S., Gutfreund, M., Satterly, F. & Wells, G. (1983). Characteristics of adult speech which predict children's language development. Journal of Child Language 10. 65–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L., Rocissano, L. & Hood, L. (1976). Adult-child discourse: developmental interaction between information processing and linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Psychology 8. 521–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, J. N. & Stanowicz, L. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: adult responses to children's language errors. Developmental Psychology 24. 684–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J. (1985). Learning how to use verbs: lexical coding and the influence of the input. Journal of Child Language 12. 587–95.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language 6. 423–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleason, J. B. (1986). The child's social characteristics. Paper presented to the Teachability of Language Conference, Kansas City, Missouri.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Newport, E. L. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 11. 43–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, S. B. (1986). Sociocultural foundations of language development. Paper presented to the Teachability of Language Conference, Kansas City, Missouri.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1985). Some contributions of mothers' speech to their children's syntax growth. Journal of Child Language 12. 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1986). Function and structure in maternal speech: their relation to the child's development of syntax. Developmental Psychology 22. 155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1987 a). Topic relations in mother-child conversation. First Language 7, 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1987 b). Why some properties of maternal speech benefit language growth (and others do not). Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. & Shatz, M. (1982). Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. Psychological Bulletin 92. 3–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental Design. Second edition. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's Language. Vol. 2, New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, L. & Pien, D. (1982). Mother conversational behaviour as a function of interactional intent. Journal of Child Language 9, 337–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. E., Denninger, M. S., Bonvillian, J. D., Kaplan, B. J. & Baker, N. D. (1984). Maternal input adjustment and non-adjustment as related to children's linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In Pellegrini, A. D. & Yawkey, T. D. (eds), The development of oral and written language in social contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Nolan, C. (1987). Under the eye of the clock: the life story of Christopher Nolan. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. In Rice, M. L. & Schiefelbush, R. (eds), The teachability of language. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about there and then: the emergence of displaced reference in parent-child discourse. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's Language. Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1987). Bootstrapping operations in child language. In Nelson, K. E. & van Kleeck, A. (eds.), Children's Language. Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Hoff-Ginsberg, E. & Maclver, D. (1989). Induction and the acquisition of English auxiliaries: the effects of differentially enriched input. Journal of Child Language 16. 121–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieffelin, B. B. & Ochs, E.(1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology 15. 163–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development 57. 1454–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong Fillmore, L. (1986). Strategies for second language acquisition. Paper presented to the Teachability of Language Conference, Kansas City, Missouri.Google Scholar