Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-jkt97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-19T03:15:47.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonetic analysis of late babbling: a case study of a French child*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Bénédicte De Boysson-Bardies ,
Laurent Sagart  and
Nicole Bacri
Bénédicte De Boysson-Bardies
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie, C.N.R.S.
Laurent Sagart
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie, C.N.R.S.
Nicole Bacri
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie, C.N.R.S.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The late babbling productions of a French child are analysed and compared with a similar study of English-speaking children. English-speaking and French children are shown to share such universal phonetic preferences as cluster reduction, final devoicing, etc. However, there are also noticeable differences which may be ascribed to corresponding differences in the target language. Thus a selective, language-specific, phonetic acquisition has been taking place during the babbling stage. A comparison of the phonetic repertoires of French, English, Thai and the late babbling corpus confirmed the close similarity between the latter and French. This study reinforces the view that babbling is relevant to the study of linguistic performance.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1981 , pp. 511 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L. (1970). Language development. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
de Boysson-Bardies, B., Bacri, N. & Sagart, L. (1979). Contribution des facteurs prosodiques à l'acquisition d'une première langue. Rapport d'ATP, Paris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1970). A phonetic study of babbling. BJDisComm 5. 110–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Delattre, P. (1968). La radiographie des voyelles françaises et sa corrélation acoustique. French Review 42, 48–65.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1963). Baby talk in six languages. AmAnth 66. 103–14.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1973). Fricatives in child language acquisition. In Heilman, L. (ed.), Proc. XI Int. Cong. Ling. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino Bologna, 647–64.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Learning to pronounce: the earliest stages of phonological development in the child. In Minifie, F. D. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Communicative and cognitive abilities – early behavioral assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition, Lg 51. 419–39.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children. JChLang 1. 49–64.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jeng, H. H. (1979). The acquisition of Chinese phonology in relation to Jakobson's laws of irreversible solidarity. Communication at the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences,Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1962). Understanding language without ability to speak. JAbSocPsych 65. 410–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Leopold, W. E. (1947). Speech development of a bilingual child. Vol. 2: sound learning in the first two years. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (1936). Infant speech: a study of the beginnings of language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. (1970). Motor control of serial ordering of speech. PsychRev 77. 182–96.Google ScholarPubMed
MacNeilage, P. F. (1979). Speech production. Communication at the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences,Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, A. I. (1970). The two-year-old stage in the acquisition of English phonology. Lg 46. 426–41.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. 38, No. 149.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1975). The nominal shift in semantic-syntactic development. CogPsych 7. 461–79.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (ed.). (1978). Children's language. Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (ed.). (1979). Children's language, Vol. 11. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. JAcS 54. 1235–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Oller, D. K. & Smith, B. L. (1977). The effect of final-syllable position on vowel duration in infant babbling. JAcS 62. 994–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Oller, D. K., Wieman, L. A., Doyle, W. J. & Ross, C. (1976). Infant babbling and speech. JChLang 3. 1–11.Google Scholar
Ong, Rabieb (1975). Etude comparative des systèmes phonologiques et phonétiques du français et du thaï. Thèse de 3ème cycle, Paris III.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1977). Language learning strategies: does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Lg 53. 349–62.Google Scholar
Sagart, L. (1979). Babbling and early languages in Cantonese. Working papers in language and language teaching 2. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Stark, R. E. (1978). Features of infant sounds: the emergence of cooing. JChLang 5. 378–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Stark, R. E., Rose, S. N. & McLagen, M. (1975). Features of infant sounds: the first eight weeks of life. JChLang 2. 205–21.Google Scholar
Volker, , (1934). Frequency of phonemes. American Radio, JASA 5.Google Scholar
Weir, R. (1966). Some questions on the child's learning of phonology. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Winitz, H. & Irwin, O. (1958). Syllabic and phonetic structure of infants' early words. JHR 1. 250–6.Google ScholarPubMed