Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T18:48:20.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2008

OSNAT SEGAL ,
BRACHA NIR-SAGIV ,
LIAT KISHON-RABIN  and
DORIT RAVID
OSNAT SEGAL*
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
BRACHA NIR-SAGIV
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
LIAT KISHON-RABIN
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
DORIT RAVID
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
*
Address for correspondence: Osnat Segal, 7b Zelig Bas, Petach Tiqwa, Israel. e-mail: segalll@netvision.net.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study examines prosodic characteristics of Hebrew speech directed to children between 0 ; 9–3 ; 0 years, based on longitudinal samples of 228,946 tokens (8,075 types). The distribution of prosodic patterns – the number of syllables and stress patterns – is analyzed across three lexical categories, distinguishing not only between open- and closed-class items, but also between these two categories and a third, innovative, class, referred to as between-class items. Results indicate that Hebrew CDS consists mainly of mono- and bisyllabic words, with differences between lexical categories; and that the most common stress pattern is word-final, with parallel distributions found for all categories. Additional analyses showed that verbs take word-final stress, but nouns are both trochaic and iambic. Finally, a developmental analysis indicates a significant increase in the number of iambic words in CDS. These findings have clear implications regarding the use of prosody for word segmentation and assignment of lexical class in infancy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 629 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a PhD of Osnat Segal, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. We are indebted to three anonymous reviewers and to the associate editor of the journal for their detailed and helpful comments. The authors are alone responsible for any inadequacies that remain.

References

REFERENCES

Arciuli, J. & Cupples, L. (2004). Effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and nonnative speakers of English: evidence from onset gating. Memory and Cognition 32, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bat-El, O. (1993). Parasitic metrification in the Modern Hebrew stress system. The Linguistic Review 10, 189–210.Google Scholar
Becker, M. (2003). Hebrew stress: Can't you hear those trochees? In Kaiser, E. & Arunachalm, S. (eds) Proceedings of the PLC 26(9), 45–58.Google Scholar
Ben-David, A. (2001). Language acquisition and phonological theory: Universal and variable processes across children and across languages. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (2001). New perspectives in lexical categorization. Paper presented at the conference on Lexical and Morphological Processing in Spoken and Written Language, Bar Ilan University.Google Scholar
Bolozky, S. (1982). Remarks on rhythmic stress in Modern Hebrew. Linguistics 18, 275–89.Google Scholar
Brent, M. R. & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition 81, B33–B44.Google Scholar
Christophe, A., Guasti, T., Nespor, M., Dupoux, E. & Ooyen, B. V. (1997). Reflections on phonological bootstrapping: Its role for lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Cognition 12, 585–612.Google Scholar
Cohen-Gross, D. (1987). The morphological-syllabic structure of Modern Hebrew. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Bar-Ilan university, Israel [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Cole, R. & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In Cole, R. A. (ed.) Perception and production of fluent speech, 133–63. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language 2, 133–42.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 113–21.Google Scholar
Echols, C. H., Crowhurst, M. J. & Childers, J. B. (1997). The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 202–25.Google Scholar
Echols, C. H. & Newport, E. L. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 2, 189–220.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Newport, E. L. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of motherese hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 11, 43–79.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: The state of the state of the art. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds) Language acquisition: The state of the art, 3–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gout, A., Christophe, A. & Morgan, J. L. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 548–67.Google Scholar
Houston, D. M., Jusczyk, P. W., Kuijpers, C., Coolen, R. & Cutler, A. (2000). Cross-language word segmentation by 9-month-olds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7, 504–09.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. K. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language 44, 458–567.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64, 675–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A. & Bauman, A. (1999). Infants' sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 1465–76.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M. & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology 39, 159–207.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. H. & Bock, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 14, 389–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2008). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mattys, S. (2000). The perception of primary and secondary stress in English. Perception and Psychophysics 62, 253–65.Google Scholar
Mattys, S. L. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants. Cognition 78, 91–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P. W., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J. & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29, 143–78.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Dilley, L. C., Jusczyk, A. M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2005). English-learning infants' segmentation of verbs from fluent speech. Language and Speech 48, 279–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., Iakimova, G., Bertoncini, J., Frédonie, S. & Alcantara, C. (2006). Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language 54, 283–99.Google Scholar
Nir-Sagiv, B. (2005). Crosslinguistic and developmental perspective on word length as a criterion for vocabulary complexity. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress of the International Association of the Study of Child Language (IASCL), Berlin.Google Scholar
Peretz, I., Lussier, I. & Béland, R. (1998). The differential role of syllabic structure in stem completion for French and English. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 10, 75–112.Google Scholar
Polka, L. & Sundara, M. (2003). Word segmentation in monolingual and bilingual infant learners of English and French. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1021–24. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274, 1926–28.Google Scholar
Segal, O. (in progress). The influence of language on the preference and discrimination of stress patterns by infants 9–14 months old. PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.Google Scholar
Shi, R., Morgan, J. L. & Allopenna, P. (1998). Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: A cross linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language 25, 169–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, R., Werker, J. F. & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Newborn infants' sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition 72, B11–B21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, S. M., Liss, J. M. & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: A study of resynthesized speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122, 3678–87.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. Z. & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Segmentation cues in maternal speech to infants. Paper presented at the 7th biennial meeting of the International Conference of Infants Studies, Montreal, Québec, Canada.Google Scholar