Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:39:53.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between lexical and phonological development: a look at bilingual children – a commentary on Stoel-Gammon's ‘Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

MARGARET KEHOE
MARGARET KEHOE*
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
*
[*]Address for correspondence: Dr Margaret Kehoe, avenue de Bel-Air 74, CH-1225 Chêne-Bourg (Geneva), Switzerland. e-mail: kehoewinkler@gmx.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stoel-Gammon (this issue) highlights the close and symbiotic association that exists between the lexical and phonological domains in early linguistic development. Her comprehensive review considers two bodies of literature: (1) child-centred studies; and (2) studies based on adult psycholinguistic research. Within the child-centred studies, both prelinguistic and early meaningful speech is examined. Stoel-Gammon organizes her review of child-centred studies around a series of postulates that capture the associations between lexical and phonological development and here she focuses primarily on normally developing children acquiring American English. My intention is not to question these postulates, which are based on established research findings, but to extend them beyond the limits of her review. In my commentary, I would like to explore the application of some of the stated postulates of the early meaningful speech period in children acquiring two or more languages. In so doing, I add a cross-linguistic dimension to the discussion; a dimension that Stoel-Gammon would like to see pursued in future research on this topic. I also expand our understanding of lexical–phonological relationships by considering the potential for interaction in multiple lexical–phonological relationships.

Type
Review Article and Commentaries
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 75 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Celce-Murcia, M. (1978). The simultaneous acquisition of English and French in a two-year-old child. In Hatch, E. (ed.), Second language acquisition. A book of readings, 38–53. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Conboy, B. & Thal, D. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development 77, 712–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition: initial consonants in the first fifty words. Language 51, 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. & McKay, J. (2005). Phonological memory skill in monolingual and bilingual 23-month-ols. In Cohen, J., McAlister, K., Rolstad, K. & MacSwan, J. (eds), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, 1041–44. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1981/1982). The emerging phonological system of an Italian–English bilingual child. Journal of Italian Linguistics 2, 95–113.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. & Lleó, C. (2006). Phonological interaction in bilingual children. Poster presented at Latsis Colloquium ‘Early Language, Development, and Disorders’, University of Geneva, Geneva.Google Scholar
Law, N. & So, L. (2006). The relationship of phonological development and language dominance in bilingual Cantonese–Putonghua children. International Journal of Bilingualism 10, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. (2002). The role of markedness in the acquisition of complex prosodic structures by German–Spanish bilinguals. The International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C. & Demuth, K. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: crosslinguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H. & Tano, C. (eds), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 407–418. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lleó, C., Kuchenbrandt, I., Kehoe, M. & Trujillo, C. (2003). Syllable final consonants in Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In Müller, N. (ed.), (Non)vulnerable domains in bilingualism, 191–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V.Martínez-Sussmann, C. & Dale, P. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: evidence from bilingual learners. Developmental Science 7, 212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1998). Sounds and words in early language acquisition: the relationship between lexical and phonological development. In Paul, R. (ed.), Exploring the speech-language connection, 25–52. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language 11, 247–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vihman, M. (2002). Getting started without a system: from phonetics to phonology in bilingual development. The International Journal of Bilingualism 6, 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. & Croft, W. (2007) Phonological development: toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics 45, 683–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavas, M. (1995). Phonological selectivity in the first fifty words of a bilingual child. Language and Speech 38, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed