Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-xjl2h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T22:56:40.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transformations as mental operations: a reply to Kuczaj*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

David Fay
David Fay
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 143 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

I would like to thank Ray Bennett and Maris Rodgon for their helpful comments on the manuscript. Address for correspondence: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Box 4348, Chicago, Illinois 60680.

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. (1974). Syntactic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. (1972). Stress level and auxiliary behavior in English. LI 3. 167–81.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1964). The development of interrogative structures in children's speech. In Riegel, K. (ed.), The development of language functions. Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1971). Simplification in children's language. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: models and methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In Lenneberg, E. (ed.), New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Fay, D. (1974). Simplification in children's speech and the formulation of movement rules. Paper presented at the 1974 Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. (1975). A child and the English question formation rule. JChLang 2. 299–301.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. & Katz, J. J. (eds), The structure of language: readings in the philosophy of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Klima, E. & Bellugi-Klima, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds), Psycholinguistics papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. (1976). Arguments against Hurford's ‘Aux Copying Rule’. JChLang 3. 423–7.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar